Switching to fully Synthetic.. recommendations?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: Garak
PDX2500HD said:
Block heaters are certainly good, but if you really are worried about cold starting, an oil pan heater can be pretty handy. They've been the friend of diesel truck owners for many years.
wink.gif
My Audi even has one, since VW/Audi up here doesn't bother with block heaters after some strange lawsuit after someone's garage burned down.


I wouldn't say I'm overly worried... but lets just say, if I did live up near your neck of the woods, I'd spare no expense on the proper heating equipment (or even insure I have a heated garage if physically/financially possible) for my vehicles. Here, it gets "Cold" but not that cold.. I'm driving this truck between Portland and the mountains, and Portland and Phoenix (sometimes in the summer) and other places however.. so just because I live here, doesn't mean the truck won't run anywhere else.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but synthetics also hold up better under extreme heat (115 degree day in Phoenix, towing 15,000 trailer, and in traffic for example).. Which is very possible. I have a home in phoenix, and have lived there 10 years... I've seen the transmission temps spike past 170 degrees just idling in traffic on a friends 2007 Dmax.. that's without a trailer or high rpm loads.. Why take the risk if for $30 more, the technology is there to get cheap insurance?
 
Originally Posted By: PDX2500HD
Also, you say you own a Duramax, so turn to page 10-10 of the Duramax Engine Owners Supplement and read the middle of the page where it stats that oil life is 1 year OR 5000km/3000miles ... should the oil life indicator not be used or accidentally reset.. As you know, this oil life indication system is basically a rpm counter.... and doesn't sample oil quality or anything scientific.. it's a cheap counter and will usually que you to change the oil at WELL BELOW 10,000 miles. With my truck at 1400 miles total, it's showing 67% remaining.. if you do the math, that puts me at 4200 miles when GM says I should change my oil (they are obviously assuming mineral oil).

Also, look at page 10-8, at the bottom where it says to use 5W-40 to improve cold starting (0 C temps).. Here in Oregon, it can easily get near 0C early in the morning in many outlying parts of the Portland area, and where I go near Mount Hood, it's well below 0 often.. Why would I NOT want to use an oil that's better for cold starts, when we all know that most of the engine wear occurs on a start?



Your newer truck has different recommendations than mine, apparently. In my Damx supplement, there is no mileage statement; my manual only states that the OLM should be followed, or the OCI capped at one year, whichever comes first. My maintenance schedule (per the manual) simply calls for an OCI with the OLM, and a major service every other OLM cycle. That's all.

The OLM in GM vehicles is fairly accurate as reviewed by many of us that follow it and compare to the UOA results we get. The GM OLM is not just an rpm counter; it is much more than that. It looks as a massive amount of data and makes fairly accurate predictions. It takes into account idle time, engine temps, load factors, start cycles, OAT, etc. It truly is reasonably accurate. On a Dmax it also looks at regen cycles; that was a BIG issues on the LMMs but not so on the previous generations, and not on the new LMLs. Even the gasser GM cars have a fairly accurate OLM, and we've seen the UOA results there as well. Now, Ford's OLM is strictly a mile counter; it does not vary from that routine. But GM's OLM is much more sophisticated. And accurate. Is it 100% accurate? Probably not. But much more than you'd think. If you're only getting 5k miles out of your OLM, then you're doing a lot of short-cycle driving. And if you are only getting 5k miles (of less) by the OLM, then how in the world would syntehtic make sense?

Regarding the cold starts, I'm confident that a 5w-40 will work very well for you. But that is a VERY expensive product to buy and use for such short OCI intervals. Probably the least expensive would be T6; approximately $20/gallon? Did you know that you can get T5 10w30 for around $11.50/gallon, and have the same cold-crank rating? And save around $8 gallon. And get essentially the very same wear protection.

Your environment, your use factor, your OCI all point to simple dino oil giving you a long engine life WELL past any point you're ever likely to own it. It gets no colder where you're at than where I live. You're not going to drive it more than I drive mine; in fact, your stated OCI is less than mine. I even tow a heavy travel-trailer in the extreme heat of the western mountain states every summer for my vacation trips. All on 10w30 dino HDEO. At the risk of braggin, my UOAs are stellar (more of a statement on the quality of Rotella and not my driving ...)

Again, I challenge you to a duel of sorts. Run your choice of synthetic; do some UOAs and post your results. I already have one up, and I'll have another up this coming fall. Let's compare/contrast the real data, and leave the rhetoric and hype at the roadside. I predict you'll pay approximately 3x more money (for a PAO), and get no better wear protection for your use and OCI duration as stated. Think I'm wrong? Prove me wrong!

You wanted to know which synthetic was "best". I'll be the first to tell you that there is no "best" product for all people for all conditions. There are good decisions to be made for individual particular applications. There is no "best" motor oil, toothpaste, tomato paste, rifle caliber, etc ... for every condition. There are some that do make fairly good compromises, but there is no "best".

Look, you are free to do what you want. But you came here with your mind already made up, yet then asked for advice. Seems to me that you didn't want advice; rather, you wanted validation of your pre-concieved notions. Some people will offer that; I cannot.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: PDX2500HD
Correct me if I'm wrong, but synthetics also hold up better under extreme heat (115 degree day in Phoenix, towing 15,000 trailer, and in traffic for example).. Which is very possible. I have a home in phoenix, and have lived there 10 years... I've seen the transmission temps spike past 170 degrees just idling in traffic on a friends 2007 Dmax.. that's without a trailer or high rpm loads.. Why take the risk if for $30 more, the technology is there to get cheap insurance?



Are you wrong? No - you are not. But your perception of what is "hot" is wrong.

Yes, syntheics can protect "better" against heat. But the "heat" at which they succeed where a dino would fail is well above "normal" operation of a vehicle. Further, the range where a synthetic would be safe and a dino would not is a fairly narrow one, and is a passing moment on the way to equipment failure.

If you expernience a cooling system failure, the dino fluid would fail fairly quickly. A synthetic might prolong that occurence by less than a minute. But eventually, even that synthetic is going to get cooked. If your cooling system fails, and you continue to run, NO OIL REGARDLESS OF BASE STOCK will save your engine, regardless how many oils you've seen in a frying pan on TV.

And don't for one second start down the "but it's a turbo diesel and it gets hot in the turbo" alley, either. Turbo cooling is a matter of heat reduction via thermal transfer. As long as the oil is flowing as designed, the rate of transfer, even during a long hard pull, is sufficient to cool the turbo. The OEM engineers designed it as such. The Dmax, in particular, is probably one of the most trouble-free engines in the light duty truck market. You are not going to "cook" your turbo by using dino oil, or save your turbo from demise, should a true failure happen. If you don't understand the concept of thermal transfer as it relates to time, then here's a very simple little experiment for you ...
1) light a candle
2) run your fingers quickly over the candle, and you won't feel much heat, if any (your finger did absorb some heat, but it wasn't much due to the small time exposure)
3) pass your fingers slowly over the candle, and you'll feel some heat; it will be uncomfortble, but managable (your finger absorbed more heat, but not a dangerous amount)
4) hold your fingers over the candle until they burn (here, damage has occured to your flesh because your blood was not able to carry away enough heat to cool the skin to a sufficient level)
Get the point? As long as the oil is moving through a turbo housing, even at full tilt, the OEM design is sufficient to carry away heat without burning the oil. Synthetics cannot carry away more heat than a dino because synthetics can only flow at the very same rate and volume as the dino; oil flow is a matter of design of the lube system, not the base stock of the oil. Thermal transfer is a matter of coefficients of heat rejection and volume and flow rate. Period. NOTE: There is one time when you do need to be concerned about turbo heat soaking into the oil and that is at shutdown. You should NEVER shut down a turbo immediately after a long heat soak, regardless of engine fuel type or oil base stock. ALWAYS allow a turbo engine to idle for a few minutes rather than shut it down after a long hard pull. Normal driving is not an issue, but pulling a long grade uphill for 5 minutes and shutting the engine down at the top of the mountain for a scenic picture is not a good idea. Let the engine idle, and the oil will continue its job of "thermal transfer" safely.

Now, I would agree that synthetics also resist oxidation and evaporation a bit better than dino oils, but this is eaisly negated with (you guessed it!) OCI duration. And since the OP already stated that long OCIs are not his thing, then these two points are moot in his application.

A Dmax is an liquid cooled engine; unless there is a cooling system failure, your temps are regulated to around 210 deg F. That is by design. Believe it or not, oil temps can actually be too cold at times. You want the oil to get up to temp as quickly as possible, and then stay there as long as possible. The heat of AZ is not an issue that most would believe. For an air cooled motor, perhaps. But not a diesel truck with a good towing package. I actually want my engine to to be between 200-210 F all the time; that is the proper operating temp range. I have NEVER seen mine go over 215 F, even when towing.

As for the transmission, 170 deg F is not hot either. Those of us that tow frequently in hot climates and mountainous places, will often see 180-200 deg F as the norm, and it can spike to around 225 deg F in long pulls uphill, and perhaps a bit more. But that is not "too hot" for the fluids. Fluids degrade not just with heat, but the time in combination with heat. Being up to 250 deg F is not even a danger if it is brief. Is it desireable? No, it's not. But it's not a death knell either. I saw my transmission get up to 210 deg F once, pulling across SD in 98 deg F OAT, into a massive headwind at 75 mph travel speed. Considering that the red-line on the transmission gage is 275 def F, I really wasn't anywhere near the danger zone.

So, yes, synthetics can tolerate heat better than dino oils. But no, it really doesn't make much difference in the real world given your conditions and the design of the Dmax vehicle.

Now, once again, I agree that synthetics are good products, but only when used with the understanding of both their benefits and limitations. I use synthetics in my truck; I have Mobil 1 in the diffs, Mobil 1 in the t-case, and AutoTrans-5 in the transmission. But I use those because the OCIs I intend to put them through are long, and the payoff is there; I can get the ROI. The synthetics are not "better"; rather, they last "longer".
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: PDX2500HD
I wouldn't say I'm overly worried... but lets just say, if I did live up near your neck of the woods, I'd spare no expense on the proper heating equipment (or even insure I have a heated garage if physically/financially possible) for my vehicles. Here, it gets "Cold" but not that cold.. I'm driving this truck between Portland and the mountains, and Portland and Phoenix (sometimes in the summer) and other places however.. so just because I live here, doesn't mean the truck won't run anywhere else.


Dnewton3 addressed the heat issue quite well. I'd add one thing you can test yourself. Change the oil after a good, long winter run the brings the oil up to temperature. Feel it. Do the same after a similar run on one of the hottest days in the year. There will be a difference, but not that much. I've changed oil in vehicles that were run all day on the hottest days of the year, with AC on, immediately after shut down. I always spill oil on my hands, and I've never burned them.

For the weather, you're probably right. I just saw Mount Hood, and it can get a bit frosty.
wink.gif
 
You say I came here for advise... you're right, but it wasn't on whether to use mineral or synthetic.. if you read my post, it was on Schaefer v. Mobil.. Also, I am paying $26/gallon for the Schaefer 9000, how is that expensive? It's costing me literally $30 more to use than mineral oil... and YES, I do have a lot of short drives and idling.. more reason for start protection I'd suspect, and more importantly, if the oil life remaining % is as accurate as you claim, then why wouldn't I get more life (time) out of synthetic? Isn't that after all what you claim is the primary benefit of synthetic? I honestly don't think it knows whether I'm running synthetic or not... it just goes by the parameters you already discussed and "Assumes" mineral oil in the crank case.. So I might be safe to just hit that "reset" button and go another cycle.. I'll get a UOA done and see.
 
Originally Posted By: PDX2500HD
You say I came here for advise... you're right, but it wasn't on whether to use mineral or synthetic.. if you read my post, it was on Schaefer v. Mobil.. Also, I am paying $26/gallon for the Schaefer 9000, how is that expensive? It's costing me literally $30 more to use than mineral oil... and YES, I do have a lot of short drives and idling.. more reason for start protection I'd suspect, and more importantly, if the oil life remaining % is as accurate as you claim, then why wouldn't I get more life (time) out of synthetic? Isn't that after all what you claim is the primary benefit of synthetic? I honestly don't think it knows whether I'm running synthetic or not... it just goes by the parameters you already discussed and "Assumes" mineral oil in the crank case.. So I might be safe to just hit that "reset" button and go another cycle.. I'll get a UOA done and see.


I certainly agree with you here. The OLM is predicated on the concept of conventional oil use; it has no idea that you "upgraded" to synthetic. If you're going to run synthetic, then use the UOAs and don't go by the OLM. Of course, then you're into the next caveot of the lube world. The cost of UOAs can be from $15 - $30, depending upon the serivce you use. A Blackstone UOA with TBN costs more than a dino OCI in a Dmax. It's cheaper to change oil than to test it, unless you push the OCI out even farther!

I should apologize for my rough treatment; I don't mean to offend you. OTOH, when you come for advice, it would be wrong to suggest that your methods are sound, when you're predictably going to be wasting money. You're trying to justify the use of synthetic, and get us to agree with you. I will not agree, given your situation. Your use, severity, environemnt and OCI plans are all well within the capabilities of conventional oil. You're falsely presuming that you'll experience some type of "advantage" in your particular situation. There are many, many UOAs that prove this isn't the case. But you insist on learing the hard way. Go right ahead; it's your money, not mine.

If you want me to tell you which synthetic HDEO is "better" between Mobil and Schaeffers, I'm going to tell you that it does not make any differnce. Either one is going to do the job very well. Both of them are well respected for very good reasons. Both of them have shown excellent performance in UOAs. I always ask that people consider supporting our vendors, but they both support this site, so you cannot even distinguish there.

I'm famous for making analogies; so here's another:
There has been a long standing dabate in the world of firearms as to which is the better hunting rifle; .308 or .30-06. They both have their pluses and minuses. One hits a bit harder, the other is a bit more accurate. One is more predominant in the market, the other is more easily "tuned" in hand loading. Overall, they each can get the job done very well.
But they are both, in fact, overkill, when hunting squirrel ...
 
Last edited:
Well, as an owner of a Rem 700 in 30.06 I can tell you that I use that gun for deer, but I take my .460 Wby for Cape Buffalo... some would argue that .458 is plenty of gun, but in my usual fashion, I like overkill!

thanks for your education on oil, I know more than I did before, but my conservative nature, and deep pockets allow me to have the luxury of wasting the few extra dollars on the synthetic, logic not withstanding.
 
Understood; the decision is but yours to make.

Please, post up your UOAs when the time comes. We all enjoy sharing with others and seeing the info.

And Happy Holidays!
 
Originally Posted By: PDX2500HD
You say I came here for advise... you're right, but it wasn't on whether to use mineral or synthetic.. if you read my post, it was on Schaefer v. Mobil.. Also, I am paying $26/gallon for the Schaefer 9000, how is that expensive? It's costing me literally $30 more to use than mineral oil...


That's certainly not a bad price, particularly from a Canadian perspective. Here, Schaeffer's isn't even readily available - I have yet to see it anywhere here. Mobil products are, of course, readily available. I don't know what a gallon of Delvac 1 ESP 5w-40 is going for right now.

Availability is always the key for me. I don't care if Delvac 1 were $10 a gallon, if only one gallon were available or I had to drive 100 miles for it, it wouldn't cut it. I used to buy all my oil at the truck stop, since its hours were good, it had a good selection, and pricing was tolerable.

As an aside, I should give Imperial Oil a phone call. I filled up at my local Esso the other day, and glanced at their oil display. They had one jug of Mobil 1000, and the rest was all SOPUS products. I wonder how that would go over at Imperial Oil HQ.
 
I will post the UOA for my first change ... could be a while until that change, but when I get to with in 10% the end of the oil life as per the % indication, I'll send out a sample to Blackstone.
 
Some folks just dont buy into synthetics but I do. I do not discount the effectiveness of dino's but I enjoy the benefits of synthetics. Been using them for twenty years or more now.

Dinos are fine and better than ever maybe but I prefer syn.

It is always appreciated when replies stay on topic in an effort to aid the OP. He asked for syn recommendations...
 
While you guys natter over the advantages/drawbacks of synthetic vs non-synthetics, and who got what increase in fuel economy,
it might be worthwhile to think about fuel dilution in the diesel pickups manufactured since 2007.

Your truck may or may not have the problem, but oil analysis is probably the best way to find out. If you are curious, go to the AMSOIL website. On the right, scroll down to the Tech Service Bulletins. There, scroll down to Engine Oil, then look at the one on Fuel Dilution in diesels.

If you have severe fuel dilution problems, you may not deem use of synthetics to be worthwhile, unless there are other considerations (such as temperature or verified fuel economy differeces).
 
The OP has the new 2011 LML Dmax; the "regen" cycle is now handled by an extra injector in the exhaust system, downstream of the turbo. This was done specifically to address the fuel dilution issue; it takes the need for fuel out of the exhaust stroke in the engine. Hence, no concern for fuel dilution. Neat idea, if you ask me, although it does add some cost for the 9th injector, but probably worth it.

Guys with LMM (interior engine regen's) engines typically have to worry about fuel dilution, but only if they do a lot of short drive cycles. If one uses the truck for long drive cycles, and gets it good and hot, where the exhaust has enough heat energy to burn the DPF without the aid of the 'extra' fuel, then longer OCIs are not a problem there either.
 
I've been using Amsoil 10w30 ACD synthetic diesel oil. Previously, I've used the Shell Rotella 10w30 T5 before. Amsoil is much more expensive, but its designed for longer drain intervals. You will be fine with Shell T5, it's $11.50/gallon at wal-mart. I use the Mobil 1 303 oil filter. Great reults!
 
I "Always" get better MPG when going from Colo. to Kan. Truck,Car, Motorcycle... and from 2 to 4 MPG.. Maybe nothing to do with the oil..
 
Originally Posted By: GR2110
I "Always" get better MPG when going from Colo. to Kan. Truck,Car, Motorcycle... and from 2 to 4 MPG.. Maybe nothing to do with the oil..


I made the same trip last summer, and got abnormally good fuel economy. I chalked it up to westerly winds at my back as I headed east, and a predominantly downhill grade all the way.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom