An important thing I've learned over the past four years regarding these things is this: if you have seen aerosol operations/"persistent chemtrails" complete with their after effects and still try to tell yourself "persistent contrails, ice crystals", then I'm sorry, any issues of this magnitude are NOT for you. I can respect that. I must.
Originally Posted By: Samilcar
Swamp gas.
Originally Posted By: LS2JSTS
Originally Posted By: Samilcar
Swamp gas.
No, it's a weather balloon...
haha love it!
Originally Posted By: Drew99GT
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40087187/ns/us_news-security/
A jetliner with a "spectacular contrail"?
They must have had the fuel mix all messed up.
Seriously huh! Speaking of which, I saw a jet today that was apparently cruising with 'no engines' for a few hundred miles, only to fire them up mid-flight strategically over Toronto, leaving a long, dense "spectacular contrail" that remained
intact for at least 45 minutes afterwards before
starting to appreciably dissipate. No surprise, but a nice daily reminder the program is alive and well.
Originally Posted By: tinmanSC
Originally Posted By: ItsuMitsubishi
No one will listen to me regarding this and most other "rocket launches"
There is probably a good reason for that.
Extrodinary claims require extordinary proof. The "chemtrail" crowd makes lots of claims........
I think Prince (as in, The Artist Formally Known As) is a big "chemtrailer" too. To be honest, it's a fascinating theory as long as you don't take it too seriously.
Of course. Because why would any military faction care about influencing or controlling the largest forces on the planet, when they can screw around with little rockets and missiles like cavemen. Why bother with very advanced energy weapons and forces of nature that can distress, destroy an enemy and their economy and infrastructure without the intent even occurring to them, when you can limit yourself to explosive firepower that anyone can identify for retaliation? Heck, why even think like a military when they can operate on a very limited civilian level of understanding that the only weapons are ones that go bang?
Rockets and missiles continue to be developed, but it's all a joke. Just a complete joke. It's all for show and good measure. It gives our men and women something to play with in 3rd world countries and sell to our primitive enemies (whoops... scratch that last part)
The
real technologies held by these institutions will make civilians' head explode. Things we can only entertain in the realm of science fiction. We've had gravitic propulsion since WW2. Of course at the time, they couldn't figure out how to launch projectiles from the crafts through the actual field driving it. Fast fwd to today, and those things are all taken care of and then some. So much so, that we can use these craft to place aerosols basically anywhere we want. (and travel through space, but hey... let's imagine Soyuz is cutting edge) UFO sightings? I'll say most of them are our own. But sometimes, for most people, it's best not to think about any of that and just switch on Discovery Channel
Originally Posted By: Al
Originally Posted By: ItsuMitsubishi
No one will listen to me regarding this and most other "rocket launches", and that might as well be the best thing to happen but, these are NOT rockets. I've been paying close attn to this op since I really started taking it seriously in '06 and that my friends, is an aerosol dump. It has nothing to do with defense (other than military execution), but instead climate modification.
Do you Art Bell, George Noory Coast to Coast much??
http://www.coasttocoastam.com/
Any Black Helocopters or people from the center of the earth accompany it??
Originally Posted By: Drew99GT
It's China. They've come to collect on our debt.
Did anyone call China to see if they still exist??
Oh sure, while not a regular listener, I've heard that show address these issues. It's good to get the gears turning for people who are new to anything like this, but they and some others will never get into any type of detail past a certain point.
If an individual wants to know something, they'll have to go at it themselves. Most conspiracy theories are not gospel, but mere hints. The ones with merit should be considered as "how would a civilian explain a huge black operation that's bigger than their life, in their own words". It usually ends up sounding wild and fantastical, hard to describe and incredulous. This works great for the conspirators, as the lay man haplessly trips over his own thoughts with a few elements of truth and no way to contextualize it- leading other lay people to disbelieve them right off the bat. Speaking of conspiracies inherently either a)inspires investigation b)form a bandwagon for well-meaning, ill-informed people to jump onto or c)polarize one to denial by appearing so outlandish to one's current mindset that any chance of comfort for them lies in denial only. b) is for impressionable hippies a)is really the only way to go, but will be an exersize of futility if combined with c), as no matter what, if you're looking for the result of disproof, you'll allow anything (like swamp gas, weather balloons, rich kerosene mixtures melting steel in less than an hour and 'mea culpa' rocket test admissions) to qualify as such.
Good explanation: the launch was us saying downgrade me to an A+, I'll show you A+, check my aim, and next time it will be real.
