Otto has a very storied, successful history with mono-grade 30 wt in his old 6.9L IDI Ford. As I recall it had 450k miles on LLG before being taken, and was running fine even at that point. I'm sure he's aware of the pros and cons of the vis; it will be fine for FL (he has not updated his profile and is not in TN).
As for this specific product's use in a Dmax: the CI-4 rating is acceptable for his 2006. I, too, have a 2006 (mine is an LBZ; his could be the same or a late model LLY). They were spec'd for CH-4 or greater in the manual, so the CI-4 would be fine. Presuming his OCIs were not greatly extended, I see no issue whatsoever in regard to safe wear rates, etc. The high TBN is moot, as he's using ULSD fuel. The LBZ/LLY uses EGR, but not an insane amount, so CJ-4 is not a necessity for soot control; the engine also has no regen cycles as it was prior to the 2007 MY change of the LMM. Basically, if he keeps the OCI limited to the OEM OLM, there will be no problems at all.
The only thing that would conern me is if the lube is of recent blending (manufacture) or not. I would not want a lube that has been sitting idle for 6-7 years, and then, after buying a case or two, try to stretch it out a few more years in the crankcase. If the lube has a "born on" date of 2010 or later, I'd say he could use it with no qualms whatsoever.
I would presume the cost is the driving factor here; $8/gallon is not bad at all. But I would also note that I've seen CJ-4 lubes recently for just as cheap. Peak CJ-4 15w40 was on sale nationally at AAP for $9/gallon. And I've seen a $5/gallon rebate from Mobil on Delvac; at my local farm store that made the gallon only $7 after rebate at Rural King!!!
So - it's safe for his Dmax. It's not really going to be any "better" or "worse" in terms of wear; the engine just isn't that picky. And if the price is right to him, so be it.