- Joined
- Sep 28, 2002
- Messages
- 39,793
quote:
There was a time when things were fought for. Now, the violence having much been put aside, there is the economic strategy...laboring for wages to offer for trade. The cost of which growns as the supplier fancies more and greater things, as does the buyer, for which higher costs come to constrict that psychosis, bring one around to re-evaluate their labor, income, "direction", etc.

j/k

The theme of this topic is that somehow it is thought that the monopoly that we had on industrial clout, and the economic clout that it allowed, were to be "never ending". We stopped increasing our per capita income in 1973 or 1974 when the "Fair Trade" laws were abolished. We also produced a bunch of domestic fine things (stereos) and a lot of domestic junk (autos).
Your definition is a big stretch for the entire " middle class of the 60's". I would say ...probably a home in the burbs ...one newer car ..one older car ...a one or two week vaction in a hotel/motel/camping.quote:
Job classes that would have given a family a solid middle class standard of living (my definition: A modest primary residence, 2 cars, and a basic vacation/secondary residence) in the 1960’s will now give a family an upper lower class or lower middle class standard of living in 2005. In an attempt to compensate for this, a family will now have both parents working, and carry additional debt load.
Our upward mobility ..and even holding groud will continue to be eroded. There is no justification for this % of the world's population to command the % of resources that we do. It's that simple. If you want a "managed lifestyle" environment, you need to move to one of the Nordic nations where if you're poor you make 20k a year...and if you're rich ..you make 24k a year. Where your professionals only work 6 months a year due to the tax structure and your trade is totally or closely balanced. Nothing comes in ..without something going out.
If you are going to live and prosper by the sword ..you will also fall under it. We soaked up most of the world's wealth in the post WWII boom ..and we've been putting it back.
In the end ..we'll be where we deserve to be. It just isn't any fun coming off of such a high. None of us can perceive it as such since it typically began before we were born and we didn't know any better. Now we look at a more normalized existance as "lacking" since we have no understanding of the accident of being the only intact economy at 100% industrial and aggriculatural production for the world that was blown to crap.