Solid advice from a Jeep forum...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
689
Location
Chicago, IL
"Using Diesel-spec oil (API Service Cx) isn't a problem - provided it has a gasoline spec (API Service Sx) as well. There are a couple of additives required in one that aren't required in the other - this is why the new API "Energy Saving" spec (API Service SM) has no equivalent Diesel spec. For instance, it doesn't have enough acid neutralisers in it (Diesels will rapidly form sulphuric acid in the engine oil. New "low-sulphur" Diesel fuels mitigate this somewhat, but it's still present. Diesels - and flat-tappet gasoline engines - also require anti-scuff additives. These are typically organometallic compounds that will rapidly poison a catalyst bed.)

This is why I've been telling owners of the 242ci engine to avoid oils with the API Energy Saving "sunburst" on the front of the bottle - and to flip the bottle over and check the back anyway. Don't use API Service SM in flat-tappet engines. Camshaft failure will result eventually. Not in a single oil change, but consistent use will make failure a certainty.

Shell Rotella T is specified, I believe, API SL/CJ-4, which is acceptable for use with flat tappets. Synthetics - particularly performance synthetics - may have SM-spec oil useful with flat tappet engines, but check manufacturer literature (some new anti-scuff additives are probably being developed, but they're not mainstream yet.)

This is akin to the failures that result from using NGLI Service GL-5 gear oil in manual transmissions that have bronze synchroniser rings - the sulphur added is antagonistic to yellow (copper and copper-based alloy) metals, and it will dissolve the bronze (given time.) This results in losing synchroniser rings and bushings in the case. Some "performance synthetic" gear oils (Amsoil and Redline in particular) carry a GL-5 spec without using added sulphur as an Extreme Pressure (EP) lubricant, and therefore will serve with yellow metal. Manufacturer literature will specifically state such service - if you're not sure, put GL-3 in your AX-4/5/15 instead. NLGI Service GL-5 is still available in most places.

Of course, if you're using synthetic in an engine that tolerates it will (the seals don't get crud flushed off of them and they start to leak, or excessive blowby results. These are wear/service factore, and have nothing to do with the oil!) a change interval of 15,000-18,000 miles is perfectly acceptable. F'r instance, my wife's car (2005 Suzuki Verona) saw me switching from dino oil for break-in, at 30,000 miles, to a full synthetic oil - and going from a 3,000-mile change interval to a 15,000-mile change interval. This justifies spending the extra for synthetic - it costs about twice as much, but will run five times as long.

Use a quality filter - if I can't find Baldwin, I'll use Wix. I don't consider anything else acceptable. A "house brand" oil filter is acceptable - if it's made by Baldwin or Wix. Ask. If they can't tell you (or the answer is something other than Baldwin or Wix,) pay the extra buck or two for a real Baldwin or Wix filter - it's worth it. If you have to stock up and order them by the case (typically twelve pieces,) go ahead and do so.

Ideally, you'll want to switch an engine to full synthetic at 25,000-50,000 miles, for minimal trouble. This is long enough to allow for full run-in and "part lapping,) but not so long that you'll flush crud off the back of your seals and find leaks you'd have eventually found anyhow. If you want to switch well after that, you'll want to flush your engine - this can be done (in service) by substituting one quart of oil with one quart of automatic transmission fluid (preferably Type F if you can find it - it's higher in detergent) for a couple of changes before the switch. This usually gets the crud out that has been building up, and will allow you to see if any seals want changing before the actual switch. (It's an old mechanic's trick. The base oil for transmission fluid and engine oil is the same, it's just that the transmission fluid is a straight 10-vis oil. The detergent content is much higher in ATF, and highest in Type F. I've also used it for an ersatz hand cleaner - get the crud off with Type F, wash the Type F off with regular hand soap. Run a normal 3,000-mile change interval when you do this.)

Once you switch to synthetic, you can extend your change interval significantly. Add a "bypass" oil filter (a secondary extra-fine filter that cleans the little crud out of the oil and returns it to the sump,) and you can probably extend your change intervals still farther. The base oil doesn't break down - it's the additives that eventually fail. This is why oil can be "rerefined" - crack off the additives, add a new additive package, and resell it. I wish I could still find rerefined oil...fail. This is why oil can be "rerefined" - crack off the additives, add a new additive package, and resell it. I wish I could still find rerefined oil..."

===============================================================

Only diesels and flat-tappets require "anti-scuff" compounds?

Camshaft failure will result? My uoa's don't say so.

15,000 oci's without uoa's?

No new engines should run synthetic right away?

I need to flush my engine before switching to synthetic? And use ATF of all things? Type F has the most detergents?

Can't find rerefined oil???


One of the other responses said current engine oils have less detergents than ATF's...

This was posted on an oil topic over at a Jeep forum I regular. Great forum for mechanical advice, I've given more than my fair share. Stuff I don't know I won't post. It boggles my mind on how much misinformation there is though.

I've decided to stop posting in oil related topics. Most would rather die than believe that an ATF crankcase flush doesn't do anything.
 
The semi-myth is sustained by bona fide testing that showed increased cam wear below (thinking) 1200ppm of zddp. The part that was missing is that the wear increase was not proved significant and was done (iirc- I could be wrong) at higher spring rates than the jeep engines use. I believe the jeep engines use springs with 180lbf.

He's right about the length of service ..even if it's sorta for the wrong reasons. These engines aren't hard on oil. Pretty boring other than some being slightly noisier (metals) than others. He's over extending himself to some degree by blindly stating the mileage figures across any/all applications. There are always exceptions.

I'd give it a C+/B- overall for content. A D- for grasping the conceptual truths of the topic he claimed to be an authority.

I'm sure we were all there at one time. Many of us still are on some topics. Lubrication is broad and complicated beyond the consumer level.
 
The base oil for transmission fluid and engine oil is the same, it's just that the transmission fluid is a straight 10-vis oil. The detergent content is much higher in ATF, and highest in Type F. I've also used it for an ersatz hand cleaner - get the crud off with Type F, wash the Type F off with regular hand soap. Run a normal 3,000-mile change interval when you do this.

Got to be honest. Never considered the benefits of a 3K hand wash with transmission fluid.

Go figure.
21.gif
 
I don't agree with him that all synthetics can go 5 times as long as conventionals. He said with dino he needed 3k OCI, and with synthetics it magically went to 15K. At best it's more like 2x on average. Really I don't agree with much he said regarding synthetics, eg, throwing a 15K OCI out there without considering climate and driving cycle, that you should drive 30K miles break-in before switching to synthetic, or that as a general rule synthetics will clean seals and cause them to leak. A quality conventional oil shouldn't sludge packing seals.Also I'm not so sure ATF has much detergents in it. But other than that it wasn't too bad of advice.
 
Originally Posted By: mechanicx
I don't agree with him that all synthetics can go 5 times as long as conventionals. He said with dino he needed 3k OCI, and with synthetics it magically went to 15K. At best it's more like 2x on average. Really I don't agree with much he said regarding synthetics, eg, throwing a 15K OCI out there without considering climate and driving cycle, that you should drive 30K miles break-in before switching to synthetic, or that as a general rule synthetics will clean seals and cause them to leak. A quality conventional oil shouldn't sludge packing seals.Also I'm not so sure ATF has much detergents in it. But other than that it wasn't too bad of advice.


Yeah he left out a few details and the 30k deal is way off.

Many people learn oil ONCE. Whatever the "state of the art" is at that time is frozen in stone.
 
Originally Posted By: mechanicx
I don't agree with him that all synthetics can go 5 times as long as conventionals. He said with dino he needed 3k OCI, and with synthetics it magically went to 15K. At best it's more like 2x on average. Really I don't agree with much he said regarding synthetics, eg, throwing a 15K OCI out there without considering climate and driving cycle, that you should drive 30K miles break-in before switching to synthetic, or that as a general rule synthetics will clean seals and cause them to leak. A quality conventional oil shouldn't sludge packing seals.Also I'm not so sure ATF has much detergents in it. But other than that it wasn't too bad of advice.

I'd say it's wholy dependant upon the oil and the application. Assuming the same application, for some they'll be able to extend 2X - if the switch is from a good Group II+ to a Group III synthetic. For others,5X - if switching from a group II to a group III/IV, IV or V.
 
Last edited:
Okay dumb question: What is a Flat Tappet Engine? Would a 2.4 toyota camry fall into this category? Once again, sorry for this dumb question.
 
I don't know. It's contamination and additive depletion that mostly breaks down the oil. When you look at the GM OLM it takes convetional oil out as about as far as most people's UOA takes them with synthetic ~10-12K miles. Probably first the TBN drops then evenetually zddp is used up.

If he would've said an extended performance synthetic AND long life oil filter (he said WIX), I'll go for maybe 3x as long OCI. If you really are doing short trips that require 3K group II dino changes then even with Castrol Edge or Mobil 1 EP you would still be looking at about ~10K/1year to get the same protection. Would some super premium long life synthetics go longer? I'm not sure but he didn't even specify an EP type synthetic let alone group IV, V types.

I just think under the same conditions at best you are look at 3x longer. Anytime you could be pushing a synthetic out past 15K you should be able to do 5-10K on a conventional.

Maybe Synlube can do 5X the OCI of conventional
lol.gif
?
 
bfrey,

It's not a dumb question, and the answer is kinda. No it's not, in that a "flat tappet" engine would generally be considered a cam-in-block with the cam pushing tappets pushing rockers pushing valves. Your engine has an overhead cam pushing a bucket sitting upside down on top of the valve. The similarity would be both have a cam sliding across a piece of metal and not rollers of any sort. So, some might say that you would also need extra zddp. The difference is that the mass of your (and any typical bucket actuated OHV engine) valvetrain is 10% of this, and correspondingly the spring pressure is much much less.

So, in a way yes, but OHV engines seldom experience the issues brought up here.
 
Quote:
Okay dumb question: What is a Flat Tappet Engine?


Flat Tappets are lifters that ride directly on the camshaft. Or more correctly, slide across the lobes.

Roller Tappets have rollers that roll along the cam lobes.

Roller on the left, flat on the right;
344zdsl.gif


Flat tappets riding on a cam;
2ekhlcz.jpg



Alex.
 
Right, but he doesn't have either of those things. In the 2azfe, the cam rides on the top of this type of bucket, which fits over the valve and spring:

Buckets003.jpg


No roller, but obviously much lighter than even an ohv tappet, and no extra weight of a rocker.
 
Nice pics.

I remember someone posting that old GM tsb about using ATF in the crankcase. The results interpreted the wrong way.

I was wondering where the train of thought came from Type F having more detergents than a universal ATF?
 
If an engine has valves, it is a roller or flat tappet design.
[OK.. there are few extremely rare rotary valved engines.]

Either one can be loaded to failure, but flat tappets fail more readily. A bucket type follower is a flat tappet. A blanket statement about flat tappet cams can not apply.

Break in and high loadings are the problems encountered.
High performance cam systems need oil solutions -regular SM won't cut it.

GL5 gear oils can have corrosive sulfur, but try and find one that is not buffered nowadays.
And standard GL4 is not void of these compounds, anyway. It has about 1/3 of the GL5's amount.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom