Seems the new M17 isn't doing so hot

Status
Not open for further replies.
Now, since the Berettas lasted 30,000 rounds in service, and went 30,000 rounds in testing, with no failures. Since we already have spare parts, holsters, trained armorers and troops trained with that pistol, why didn't we just buy more Berettas? Not cool enough?
 
Originally Posted By: Astro14
Now, since the Berettas lasted 30,000 rounds in service, and went 30,000 rounds in testing, with no failures. Since we already have spare parts, holsters, trained armorers and troops trained with that pistol, why didn't we just buy more Berettas? Not cool enough?


That's a good point. And even if the Beretta total round counts don't add up as high as some other pistols, reliability is far more important. And for the record, I see no reason or evidence that a Beretta M-9 / 92 series pistol won't last as long, or longer than any currently produced Sig. And they've proven their reliability over the last 33 years.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top