Scientists just broke the record for the coldest temperature ever recorded in a lab

wemay

Site Donor 2023
Joined
Apr 4, 2012
Messages
17,275
Location
Everglades

"Scientists just broke the record for the coldest temperature ever measured in a lab: They achieved the bone-chilling temperature of 38 trillionths of a degree above -273.15 Celsius by dropping magnetized gas 393 feet (120 meters) down a tower.

The team of German researchers was investigating the quantum properties of a so-called fifth state of matter: Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC), a derivative of gas that exists only under ultra-cold conditions. While in the BEC phase, matter itself begins to behave like one large atom, making it an especially appealing subject for quantum physicists who are interested in the mechanics of subatomic particles.

Related: 10 science records broken in 2020

Temperature is a measure of molecular vibration — the more a collection of molecules moves, the higher the collective temperature. Absolute zero, then, is the point at which all molecular motion stops — minus 459.67 degrees Fahrenheit, or minus 273.15 degrees C. Scientists have even developed a special scale for extremely cold temperatures, called the Kelvin scale, where zero Kelvin corresponds to absolute zero.

Near absolute zero, some weird things start to happen. For example, light becomes a liquid that can literally be poured into a container, according to research published in 2017 in the journal Nature Physics. Supercooled helium stops experiencing friction at very low temperatures, according to a study published in 2017 in the journal Nature Communications. And in NASA's Cold Atom Lab, researchers have even witnessed atoms existing in two places at once.

In this record-breaking experiment, scientists trapped a cloud of around 100,000 gaseous rubidium atoms in a magnetic field inside a vacuum chamber. Then, they cooled the chamber way down, to around 2 billionths of a degree Celsius above absolute zero, which would have been a world record in itself, according to NewAtlas.

But this wasn't quite frigid enough for the researchers, who wanted to push the limits of physics; to get even colder, they needed to mimic deep-space conditions. So the team took their setup to the European Space Agency's Bremen drop tower, a microgravity research center at the University of Bremen in Germany. By dropping the vacuum chamber into a free fall while switching the magnetic field on and off rapidly, allowing the BEC to float uninhibited by gravity, they slowed the rubidium atoms' molecular motion to almost nothing. The resulting BEC stayed at 38 picokelvins - 38 trillionths of a Kelvin - for about 2 seconds, setting "an absolute minus record", the team reported Aug. 30 in the journal Physical Review Letters. The previous record of 36 millionths of a Kelvin, was achieved by scientists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in Boulder, Colorado with specialized lasers.

The coldest known natural place in the universe is the Boomerang Nebula, which lies in the Centaurus constellation, about 5,000 light years from Earth. Its average temperature is -272 C (about 1 Kelvin) according to the European Space Agency. ]

The researchers of the new study said in a statement that, theoretically, they could sustain this temperature for as long as 17 seconds under truly weightless conditions, like in space. Ultra cold temperatures may one day help scientists build better quantum computers, according to researchers at MIT. "

Originally published on Live Science.
 
I know! That was incredible to read for me as well.

Considering speed o flight is 186k MILES!!! per second....I can't even fathom light to liquid? OMG!!!

It often does not feel like we have "all that" to still discover but this type of work shows there is sooooooo much still left out there to be investigated.
 
I don't mean to reply so often but I'm intrigued. I loved Hawking's books. I was hooked the first time I read the passage concerning the train and the ping pong ball. That stuff draws me in!
 
For our liquid hydrogen processes, we get down in to the -250C range. It takes a cryogenic air separation plant, large trains of compression equipment and various forms of heat exchange to get there. Lots of megawatts of power.

If I need to isolate, purge and lock out parts of those processes, helium has to be used as it won't freeze solid at those temps, where nitrogen, etc, will.
 
When I went to school I was told outer space has an ambient of 4°Kelvin for our engineering blackbody radiation calculations. Are you saying it's lower?
 
And yet in the final analysis scientists don't know how and why QM and the General Theory Really works. And in fact as the General Theory approaches the quantum size and QM approaches General Theory Size they disagree.
 
Light (photons) will never "become a liquid". The "journalist" probably misquoted the scientist, saying Hydrogen will become a liquid.

 
Light (photons) will never "become a liquid". The "journalist" probably misquoted the scientist, saying Hydrogen will become a liquid.
I’m not certain that I understand what was meant in that sentence, but liquid hydrogen occurs at much higher temperatures than this experiment.
 
When I went to school I was told outer space has an ambient of 4°Kelvin for our engineering blackbody radiation calculations. Are you saying it's lower?
Yes, this is essentially cosmic background radiation leftover from the BB. It is possible to get colder although I believe absolute zero is not achievable ever due to the vacuum energy and virtual particles spontaneously popping into and out of existence which happens as a consequence of QM no matter how cold.
 
And yet in the final analysis scientists don't know how and why QM and the General Theory Really works. And in fact as the General Theory approaches the quantum size and QM approaches General Theory Size they disagree.
They disagree bigly yet there must be a connection due to the fact that the macro scale universe was once quantum mechanical in size and of course black holes squish macro-scale objects into QM objects all the time. I just finished a book about this - the crux being the general theory of relativity is background dependent - it has to be since it is literally the theory of how the background of space-time bends in response to mass/energy (the stage has in influence on the actor's behavior). QM is background independent and the stage on which the QM calculations are done do not seem to be influenced by space-time at all (the stage has no impact on the actors).

So right now there is sting theory and super string theory and quantum loop gravity (literally trying to quantize space-time in an attempt to make it background independent) but little headway has been made in a long time.
 
My theory is that the creation and operation of the universe is too complicated that it will never be figured out. Sure, amazing advancement and applications about QM are being discovered but the real how and why is totally elusive. Hope I'm wrong.
 


You need to actually *read* those articles (and understand them...).

Photons don't liquify.
 
My theory is that the creation and operation of the universe is too complicated that it will never be figured out. Sure, amazing advancement and applications about QM are being discovered but the real how and why is totally elusive. Hope I'm wrong.
The real problem is the energy levels needed to get testable results are so far our of reach that many of the specifics will never be directly testable - especially with gravity since it is so weak. To put it into perspective, a detector would need to be the size of our solar system to detect and see some these mass-less/charge-less force particles or we would need a particle collider many many many orders of magnitude beyond anything we can do.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JTK
Back
Top