Gary,
Could be. I thought it was more of a scare / deterrent / exemplar tactic than a revenue raiser, but who really knows?
It seems to me that they go after easy targets - students, idiots, people who think the law is stupid or doesn't apply to them - that type of thing.
I would think people who have enough wealth to be worth going after would also be smart enough not to risk losing it by disregarding copyrights on something you can license legally for $0.99.
Maybe they have a big book full of the IP addresses of illegal file swappers and they just open it up and pick IP's at random, the Navin Jones model of litigation targeting!
Could be. I thought it was more of a scare / deterrent / exemplar tactic than a revenue raiser, but who really knows?
It seems to me that they go after easy targets - students, idiots, people who think the law is stupid or doesn't apply to them - that type of thing.
I would think people who have enough wealth to be worth going after would also be smart enough not to risk losing it by disregarding copyrights on something you can license legally for $0.99.
Maybe they have a big book full of the IP addresses of illegal file swappers and they just open it up and pick IP's at random, the Navin Jones model of litigation targeting!