Originally Posted By: 99Saturn
Originally Posted By: hatt
Over the long term the returns aren't what you guys think. You're focusing on current conditions and think that's what will always happen.
Quote:
There are several common myths about stock market returns.
Some believe an investor can expect an annual rate of return of 10%. Some say it is 12% and others are as high as 15%.
Unfortunately for many investors, they have banked on these myths, investing for their retirements based on getting returns of 10% to 15% annually.
If an advisor were to tell an investor that those expectations might be unrealistic, the investor would go to a different advisor that will tell him what he wants to hear.
At Cornerstone we do not shy away from reality.
The facts are that the average annual rate of return for the S&P 500 since 1871 has been about 5.63% to 5.85% annually.
http://www.businessinsider.com/the-charts-wall-street-doesnt-want-you-to-see-2011-10
Originally Posted By: 99Saturn
Originally Posted By: hatt
Assuming your investments are rocking when you want to retire and not down 50%+. In that case you probably owe $400K on a house you bought for $150K and could have had paid off 20 years ago, so you'll have to keep working until the market recovers, if it recovers. But hey, stock market FTW.
Down 50% from when? If you could have had this $150K house paid off 20 years ago, I'm assuming you've been invested for at least 20 years based on the above. When was the last time you could have been indexed in the S&P and been down 50% after 20 years?
So the last time the S&P was down 50+% after 20 years was...?
I didn't see anyone in this thread touting 10%-15% annual returns as the article indicates. The commentary has been around rates being low (3%-4%) and returns in the long term. (I specifically recall asking when the S&P's 30 year return was less than 4%).
As a point of reference, here is the dataset for the Annual ROI in the S&P 500 that dates back to 1928:
http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/histretSP.html
As well as the calculated geometric mean for 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 year returns.
No one is touting the actual long term returns. The market gamble doesn't look nearly as good. The bottom line is anyone who formulates a sensible strategy and sticks with it for 50 years is likely going to be doing pretty good. My strategy is to be totally debt free in a few years. Then I have more money to dump into whatever. I see no reason to put extra money(wife already puts in whatever her employer matches) into the stock market right now if I can pay off debts I already have. The market is likely on it's way down. When it goes down. Then dump money into it at a discount.