Originally Posted By: deepsquat
Originally Posted By: javacontour
Originally Posted By: moribundman
Originally Posted By: PandaBear
Yes for highly sensitive data that is worth recreating (i.e. defense related info, national secret, atomic bomb blue print, nuclear test simulation data).
Do you know how they destroy drives at Livermore Labs?
Don't they let former Chinese nationals take them home
Quote:
The laboratory has attracted negative publicity from a number of events. In 1999, Los Alamos scientist Wen Ho Lee was accused of 59 counts of mishandling classified information by downloading nuclear secrets—"weapons codes" used for computer simulations of nuclear weapons tests—to data tapes and removing them from the lab. After ten months in jail, Lee pled guilty to a single count and the other 58 were dismissed with an apology from U.S. District Judge James Parker for his incarceration.[1] Lee was suspected for a time of having shared U.S. nuclear secrets with China, but investigations found this not to be true.[2][dubious – discuss] In 2000, two computer hard drives containing classified data were announced to have gone missing from a secure area within the laboratory, but were later found behind a photocopier; in 2003, the laboratory's director John Browne, and deputy director, resigned following accusations that they had improperly dismissed two whistleblowers who had alleged widespread theft at the lab. The year 2000 brought additional hardship for the laboratory in the form of the Cerro Grande Fire, a severe forest fire that destroyed several buildings (and employees' homes) and forced the laboratory to close for several days.
In July 2004, an inventory of classified weapons data revealed that four hard disk drives were missing: two of the drives were subsequently found to have been improperly moved to a different building, but another two remained unaccounted for. In response, director Peter Nanos shut down large parts of the laboratory and publicly rebuked scientists working there for a lax attitude to security procedures. In the laboratory's August 2004 newsletter he wrote, "This willful flouting of the rules must stop, and I don't care how many people I have to fire to make it stop". Nanos is also quoted as saying, "If I have to restart the laboratory with 10 people, I will". However, a report released in January 2005 found that the drives were in fact an artifact of an inconsistent inventory system: the report concludes that 12 barcodes were issued to a group of disk drives that needed only 10, but the two surplus barcodes nevertheless appeared on a master list. Thus, auditors wrongly concluded that two disks were missing. The report states, "The allegedly missing disks never existed and no compromise of classified material has occurred". This incident is widely reported as contributing to continuing distrust of management at the lab. In May 2005, Nanos stepped down as director.
Quoted from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Los_Alamos_National_Laboratory
And yes, I realize the quote is about Los Alamos, they probably have similar policies, LOL.
Please don't lump[ this poor Chinese man in with the category of theft.
I have followed his case from the beginning..he was held in prison for 10 months...without charges...fully against the constitution.. the prosecution said that to give evidence of what he had stolen ..was to giv away national secrets..the judge was convinced for a while..but eventually told the prosecution to bring him evidence or they would be thrown in jail ...that was why he was release and apologized to ..all he did was take hid laptop home to do some work on it..they accused him of spying.
Your Patriot Act at work ...10 months no charges ...nice
BTW he recieved 1.6 million $$$ for the way he was treated
My comment really wasn't focused on him being Chinese, but the security that allows anyone, including someone who happens to be a Chinese national to take a drive home.
