Re: FYI, A FIELD TRIAL

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jul 8, 2006
Messages
1,080
Location
Illinois
https://www.amsoil.com/lit/g2244.pdf

Amsoil is a fine product but... That is an advertisement, not a "field trial".

Why was that post locked? To keep it a pure advertisement with no chance for rebuttal? If you want to call it a field study then it should be open for discussion.

There were a few, shall we say, exagerations I had trouble with when portraying the cost of a conventional oil change. Especially when they used commercial pricing for the cost of Amsoil. Wouldn't the company qualify for commercial pricing for conventional oil? Why would a company pay $1.85 a quart for conventional oil that caused the engines to be worn out in 150,000 miles? And $4.88 for a 5000 mile filter? With a fleet of 60 vehicles I would think they would be able to swing a little better deal than that. Any Joe off the street with no bulk purchasing power can purchase oil at RETAIL for $1.57/qt and $2.07 for a filter that will easily last 5000 miles.

Re-run the numbers on page 2 using 5000 mile OCI for the conventional oil and the retail prices of $1.57/qt of oil and $2.07 per filter.

Oil&filter cost $11.49
Labor cost: $10.00
cost to change oil per truck: $21.49
multiplied by number of yearly oil changes: 7.2 (5000 mile OCI)
Cost to change oil per truck per year: $154.73
multiplied by 60 vehicles: $9283.80
minus Amsoil cost (Commercial pricing) $9657.00
Total additional cost for Amsoil: $373.20

And what happened to the other "routine maintenance" that the trucks were in for supposedly monthly when they had conventional oil? It suddenly isn't necessary? They tout that the trucks had 12 days of down time per year before, and only 3 now. They suddenly don't need brakes, tire rotations, chassis lubes, etc now that they have Amsoil?

Finally, the trucks lasting an additional 50,000 miles when the mechanic was only looking at the trucks 3 times per year vs. 12 times per year seemed a little far fetched. Since the only thing they changed was the engine oil, the implication is that the engine wore out and was the limiting factor on the life of the truck. I don't buy that synthetic changed at 12k will give 33% more engine life than conventional changed at (their claim) 3k miles.

My
twocents.gif


Sorry if this sounded like a rant against Amsoil the product. It's really not. What set me off was seeing the ADVERTISEMENT posted and called a "field trial" with no chance to reply.
 
My only thought was why didn't they keep the trucks longer? 5k oci's wouldn't be recommended in the case of these trucks. I suspect because it would fall under the severe category. In my experience with companies they hardly get any other maintenance except oil changes unless the driver complains. I'm not siding with Amsoil so don't get me wrong.
 
An engine wearing out at 150K from running cheap conventional oil at reasonable intervals is down right laughable!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Amsoil should go into political consulting.
crackmeup.gif
crackmeup.gif
crackmeup.gif
 
No, it was locked to prevent it from turning into just another thread devoted to bashing and praising Amsoil.

And FWIW, I agree: This was nothing but an Amsoil "advertisement."
 
I had to laugh about the part that says used in extreme conditions. And then stated extreme heat as one of them.
Sure we get a few days in the 90's here but, extreme heat?? Haa!
 
Of course it's an advertisement. Was there any doubt?

These numbers are twistable whatever way you want. One way it favors whatever way you hold your head.

I guess there are a few significant differences - Amsoil did say 3-5K per month on the trucks, changed monthly. And the Amsoil was 12-15K miles, not 25K.

I say it's a wash. He didn't say WHY the trucks were replaced at 150K.

But then there is the waste oil....while I disagree that it might not be expensive to dispose - that is a bunch of used oil.
 
Quote:


No, it was locked to prevent it from turning into just another thread devoted to bashing and praising Amsoil.

And FWIW, I agree: This was nothing but an Amsoil "advertisement."




I would agree too, but in this case the thread should be just deleted, and not locked.

What I dislike the absolute most about Amsoil is the fact that you do any kind of search on the net for legitimate technical information and half or more of your hits will be Amsoil sites with testimonials and all kinds of hearsay evidence that this is the greatest oil since sliced bread. When I see a site with a wild colored background I know it is has been set up by kids or snake oil salesmen, and hit the back button. Amsoil does it every time.
 
Why should the thread even be locked? It was posted by a site sponsor. Maybe it should be moved to the site sponsor forum.

Why wasn't the Mobil 1/Honda brochure thread locked? That was a pure ad. G-man PLEASE be consistent and un-biased.
 
Quote:


Of course it's an advertisement. Was there any doubt?

These numbers are twistable whatever way you want. One way it favors whatever way you hold your head.

I guess there are a few significant differences - Amsoil did say 3-5K per month on the trucks, changed monthly. And the Amsoil was 12-15K miles, not 25K.

I say it's a wash. He didn't say WHY the trucks were replaced at 150K.

But then there is the waste oil....while I disagree that it might not be expensive to dispose - that is a bunch of used oil.




I agree it's a wash. He didn't say WHY the trucks were replaced at 150k but he did say
Quote:


The superior protection of AMSOIL has allowed
Guardian to keep its trucks in service longer than
previously possible. At an average of 36,000 miles
per year, Guardian’s trucks reach 200,000 miles
and need to be replaced every 5.6 years.




That's pretty much saying the trucks had to be replaced at 150,000 miles before, and now last 200,000 miles with Amsoil. What else could they be implying except the engines were worn out at those intervals?

I do agree the waste disposal is a significant advantage to oils capable of extended drains. But the whole cost savings argument is out to lunch.
 
Quote:


Why wasn't the Mobil 1/Honda brochure thread locked? That was a pure ad. G-man PLEASE be consistent and un-biased.




I was not being biased or inconsistent. When an Amsoil dealer posts something like that link to an Amsoil pdf, it's advertisement. If an XOM or Honda dealer had posted the Mobil 1/Honda brochure, THAT would have been advertisement.

The only reason I didn't delete the post outright is because it was a Site Sponsor that posted it. I locked it to prevent another Amsoil bash-fest or Amsoil love-fest.
 
Did not see any mention of mileage. Usually Amsoil mentions an increase and uses it as a selling point. So I guess no 2.012837538594% increrase in mileage.
dunno.gif
 
Gee guys....sorry I created such a stink.
I figured for those that MIGHT be interested they could read it and judge for themselves. And for those that just come on here to critcize and bash...well......I should have put a disclaimer.....DON'T LOOK or READ!!!! May be harmfull to your thoughts.
 
Quote:


I was not being biased or inconsistent. When an Amsoil dealer posts something like that link to an Amsoil pdf, it's advertisement. If an XOM or Honda dealer had posted the Mobil 1/Honda brochure, THAT would have been advertisement.

The only reason I didn't delete the post outright is because it was a Site Sponsor that posted it. I locked it to prevent another Amsoil bash-fest or Amsoil love-fest.





OK, sorta fair. So if a NON-AMSOIL related person would have posted it, it would have been OK?

I think the best bet would have been for Don to post it in the site sponsor forum.
 
Quote:


That's pretty much saying the trucks had to be replaced at 150,000 miles before, and now last 200,000 miles with Amsoil. What else could they be implying except the engines were worn out at those intervals?




One other point worth noting is that the article stated that "AMSOIL has been performing used oil analysis on Guardian’s fleet since April 2005". That would provide an opportunity for them to 'cherry pick' the truck they chose to test emissions on and then disassemble for the photo op. Not that they would do that.
wink.gif
grin.gif
 
Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I think the best bet would have been for Don to post it in the site sponsor forum.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'll keep that in mind for next time. I really wasn't sure where to post it. I have posted before and it has been moved to the proper forum. Thought this would have been the case here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom