Rant - Bicycles not following road rules

Status
Not open for further replies.
to explain myself about the "felony" there is a road here that i would take home from work a lot. It is Las Palmas in Hope Ranch to any local. numerous times the entire width of the road would be taken up by riders going 10-15mph. this is a very curvy one lane road which every curve is a blind corner. numerous times i would have bikers completely block the road or ride into oncoming traffic. It was very obvious when I would be coming, a 4.6L V8 with a Bassani Offroad X pipe and Spintech muffler can be heard from a long way away. A simple move over is all I would ask, instead I would get them purposefully block the road when I approached or even stop. I have no problems sharing the road with bikers and pedestrians. What I do have issues with is them not sharing in return.

O and I "learned my lesson" 4 years ago in August I totalled the Mustang. A coworker which i truly respect rides road races a lot and he agrees with me that the bikers that block lanes are in the wrong. There are bike lanes here for them to ride in.
 
The roadies do a lot of stupid things on the roadway. No question about it. I'll crest the hill and there will be a whole cluster of them, not singled out, just having their little pokey rolling coffee klatch.

I honestly can't believe that more of them aren't plowed down by distracted or intoxicated drivers.

But then if you've ever ridden on the shared bikepaths, you might understand why.

Pedestrians.

You call out, "ON YOUR LEFT!" Where does the powerwalking pedestrian go? To his left.
33.gif
The others have their i-Pods plugged in and are wandering to and 'fro with no regard for their own safety or anybody else's. You can't keep a good cadence. You are continuously braking for pedestrians and rollerbladers.

I can always hop off road and go around them on my way to the off-road trails. Do that on a road bike and you got a bent wheel in the minimum.
 
Originally Posted By: John_K
Originally Posted By: simple_gifts
They seem to assert whatever framework benefits their unrestricted forward progress.


This is the perfect way to put it.

John
Agreed.

Not too long ago, on the drive home from the train station, I saw a pair of bike riders asserting their right to take up an entire lane between the two of them despite a pedestrain-free bike path built for them. I was finally able to pass them and at the next light, they decided that they didn't need the whole lane after and split the lanes to get to the front of he line for when the light changed. Maybe what they did was perfectly legal, I don't know, but I couldn't resist yelling "Oh, so you DO know how to ride single-file when it suits you" as they passed me. Don't know if they heard me and don't really care....
grin.gif
 
The rules/laws differ from state to state. If you read the IL Rules of the Road for bicyclists, it's clear they have to follow traffic laws which includes stop signs, give signals, etc, AND ride in a single file line. No riding side by side, no riding in the middle of the lane unless temporarily to avoid debris or hazards such as a storm drain.

As has been stated before, it's not the bicyclist or the motorist that is getting the animosity. It's the entitlement mentality displayed by SOME examples from each side of the discussion.

So the problem isn't about bicycles or cars. It's about selfish people who believe they are entitled to do as they please without regard to those around them.
 
Originally Posted By: javacontour
The rules/laws differ from state to state. If you read the IL Rules of the Road for bicyclists, it's clear they have to follow traffic laws which includes stop signs, give signals, etc, AND ride in a single file line. No riding side by side, no riding in the middle of the lane unless temporarily to avoid debris or hazards such as a storm drain.

As has been stated before, it's not the bicyclist or the motorist that is getting the animosity. It's the entitlement mentality displayed by SOME examples from each side of the discussion.

So the problem isn't about bicycles or cars. It's about selfish people who believe they are entitled to do as they please without regard to those around them.


I agree with your basic point (though you can ride double file in IL by law, as long as you aren't impeding traffic), but again I'd implore you to provide an example of anyone on this thread (namely me since I'm the only one responding) demonstrating an "entitlement attitude". I made it very clear in my first postthat I make it a point to ride in a courteous manner--and that sometimes, I'm going going to ride in the middle of the road if my safety is a concern--as is my right within the law. Somehow, following the law is seem as "entitlement" by some. I'm having a very difficult time with that concept. Some on this thread have made it clear that a cyclist shouldn't follow the law, based on what they feel, or feel its appropriate to endanger a cyclist because they're mad at them. That to me is unconscionable, but seems to be thrown around in a cavalier manner.

The other thing that really needs to be addressed is the business of 'staying as far to the right as practical'. The fact is, you aren't necessarily going to see the same hazards as a cyclist unless you're on a bike. So as I've said before, some people may be riding in the middle of the road because they're idiots--and they frustrate me as much as you. Others are avoiding junk in the road or staying away from car doors, avoiding obstacles that you may not necessarily see.

I'd simply ask for people to open their eyes a little more, and understand that a cyclist is a lot more vulnerable than a driver cloaked in a 2 ton shield. Car doors, road debris and shoulder conditions are a lot bigger hazard than some realize, as are cars trying to pass when they don't have the adequate room to do so.
 
Let's be clear, I was talking about the entitlement mentality displayed by some motorists and some cyclists. I really wasn't thinking of anyone in this discussion. But if I looked hard enough, I could probably find it. (But I'm not looking, so that's not what I'm talking about.)

I rode my cheap piece of junk bike for years. I didn't even own my own car in college until my junior year, so I know about riding in a major city, dealing with cars and bikes sharing the road. I don't think I've ridden 100K miles, maybe if you count all the time I was a kid being on the go from when I left the house in the morning until sunset. I think I've done about 10 miles of biking this summer, on dedicated bike trails, on a $200 bike I got back in 1996 that keeps on rolling. So those are my qualifications for this discussion.

Things may be a little tougher today compared to 1983, but what do I know? I know I see the folks riding on the road I mentioned before, sometimes single file, sometimes in a gaggle. I've lived here for over three years and I've yet to see a cyclist stop at the four-way stop. I have seen some close calls, and none would have been the fault of the motorist.

I don't know what's happened since 1983 when I went off to college to cause cyclists to no longer feel they have to follow traffic signals, but something has changed, and it's going to get someone killed.

Combine one of those not following the laws with some passenger behind the wheel too involved in her phone conversation or parenting their child in the back seat and you have the makings of a tragedy.

The entitlement mentality of both those who are passengers behind the wheel and/or that of those who feel they don't have to follow the traffic laws on their cycles will get someone killed.

Originally Posted By: JOD
Originally Posted By: javacontour
The rules/laws differ from state to state. If you read the IL Rules of the Road for bicyclists, it's clear they have to follow traffic laws which includes stop signs, give signals, etc, AND ride in a single file line. No riding side by side, no riding in the middle of the lane unless temporarily to avoid debris or hazards such as a storm drain.

As has been stated before, it's not the bicyclist or the motorist that is getting the animosity. It's the entitlement mentality displayed by SOME examples from each side of the discussion.

So the problem isn't about bicycles or cars. It's about selfish people who believe they are entitled to do as they please without regard to those around them.


I agree with your basic point (though you can ride double file in IL by law, as long as you aren't impeding traffic), but again I'd implore you to provide an example of anyone on this thread (namely me since I'm the only one responding) demonstrating an "entitlement attitude". I made it very clear in my first postthat I make it a point to ride in a courteous manner--and that sometimes, I'm going going to ride in the middle of the road if my safety is a concern--as is my right within the law. Somehow, following the law is seem as "entitlement" by some. I'm having a very difficult time with that concept. Some on this thread have made it clear that a cyclist shouldn't follow the law, based on what they feel, or feel its appropriate to endanger a cyclist because they're mad at them. That to me is unconscionable, but seems to be thrown around in a cavalier manner.

The other thing that really needs to be addressed is the business of 'staying as far to the right as practical'. The fact is, you aren't necessarily going to see the same hazards as a cyclist unless you're on a bike. So as I've said before, some people may be riding in the middle of the road because they're idiots--and they frustrate me as much as you. Others are avoiding junk in the road or staying away from car doors, avoiding obstacles that you may not necessarily see.

I'd simply ask for people to open their eyes a little more, and understand that a cyclist is a lot more vulnerable than a driver cloaked in a 2 ton shield. Car doors, road debris and shoulder conditions are a lot bigger hazard than some realize, as are cars trying to pass when they don't have the adequate room to do so.
 
I see far, far more cyclists on a daily basis who ignore even basic traffic rules and common sense. Cops very, very rarely enforce road rules against cyclists, and there is nothing you can do.....

Yeah, there are a few that ride properly, but not enough that I feel guilty calling almsot all cyclists ignorant idiots. I hate 'em - when they get hit, they deserve it.
 
Tangentially on topic regarding the not thinking of others aspect of this topic. This morning, the Poplar Street Bridge had an accident on the IL side of the bridge, blocking three of the four lanes. The girl (she didn't look much older than 20) in front of me practically broke her neck trying to keep looking at the accident as she slowed to 60 ft/hour to watch the action.

It wouldn't have been so bad if it wasn't rush hour, if she wasn't blocking the last open westbound lane. I don't know if she thought she saw a cute fireman or policeman, but she certainly wasn't thinking about the line of cars behind her, or the safety of anyone since she certainly wasn't watching where she was going.

I'm shocked she didn't have her cell phone out taking pictures of the carnage.
 
Both my wife and I ride several times a month-usually 30-50 miles each time we ride. We're lucky that we have an outstanding trail system here, part of the rails to trails, one of which is about 3 miles from home.

We absolutely never ride on the highway-I've seen too many bicyclists nearly get creamed by a car coming over a hill at 60+ and being surprised by either a single slow moving bicyclist or a group of bikes.

On the trail we see all sorts of bicycle mentalities-from the guy in the "zone" who thinks his spandex gives him complete ownership of the trail, to some extremely polite and obviously very professional bikers who have consideration for others.

This spring I watched a couple of the spandex boys fly past me, then wipe out when they hit a group of slower riders as they rounded a bend in the trail. Their selfish, lack of consideration for others injured not only themselves, but other riders as well.

The spandex boys also have no consideration for people walking the trail. I've had a number of them "buzz" me very close even though I'm on the right shoulder of the trail. Since then I make sure I take up my half of the trail when walking and jogging-if the spandex boys want around they need to move over to the other side. If they have the courtesy to yell out "On Your Left" as they approach from behind I'll move right to make room for them. Otherwise they're forced to slow down to go around.

It's rather fun to see the frustration when they have to slow because of oncoming bikes or walkers, but their lack of courtesy will result in the same lack of courtesy from me.
 
If I extrapolate the details of this thread...

the motorists in this thread don't like it because cyclists don't obey the rules of the road AND

the motorists in this thread feel that cyclists who do obey the rules of the road (asserting a right to the lane if necessary, entering a turning lane) "have what's coming to them".

Is that about right?
 
Originally Posted By: Pop_Rivit
.... If they have the courtesy to yell out "On Your Left" as they approach from behind I'll move right to make room for them. Otherwise they're forced to slow down to go around.

It's rather fun to see the frustration when they have to slow because of oncoming bikes or walkers, but their lack of courtesy will result in the same lack of courtesy from me.


I stopped calling out "ON YOUR LEFT" on the paved mixed use trails because invariably at least one person would hear me and move that direction. Then Capt Powerwalker with his $500 "walking shoes"
33.gif
gets all offended because I "buzzed by" too close after warning him that I was passing him on his left and his idiot attempt to block my passage for my courtesy
 
Not at all. The first is correct. The second is false. The motorists are simply asking cyclists to reciprocate. If the RHS of the lane is not full of debris, then keep right so the motorists with whom you are sharing the road can safely pass. The motorists are asking that if you are going to enter a turn lane, that you don't try to lane split, likely approaching in a blind spot where we can't see you. The motorists are asking that if you are going straight, don't use the turn lane to lane split and put yourself at risk by attempting to go straight from the right hand side of the right turn lane (as an example.)

Share the road works BOTH ways. There are problems when either cars or bicyclists choose not to follow the rules of the road.

Originally Posted By: cchase
If I extrapolate the details of this thread...

the motorists in this thread don't like it because cyclists don't obey the rules of the road AND

the motorists in this thread feel that cyclists who do obey the rules of the road (asserting a right to the lane if necessary, entering a turning lane) "have what's coming to them".

Is that about right?
 
Originally Posted By: javacontour
Not at all. The first is correct. The second is false. The motorists are simply asking cyclists to reciprocate. If the RHS of the lane is not full of debris, then keep right so the motorists with whom you are sharing the road can safely pass. The motorists are asking that if you are going to enter a turn lane, that you don't try to lane split, likely approaching in a blind spot where we can't see you. The motorists are asking that if you are going straight, don't use the turn lane to lane split and put yourself at risk by attempting to go straight from the right hand side of the right turn lane (as an example.)

Share the road works BOTH ways. There are problems when either cars or bicyclists choose not to follow the rules of the road.

Originally Posted By: cchase
If I extrapolate the details of this thread...

the motorists in this thread don't like it because cyclists don't obey the rules of the road AND

the motorists in this thread feel that cyclists who do obey the rules of the road (asserting a right to the lane if necessary, entering a turning lane) "have what's coming to them".

Is that about right?


I agree with what you're saying but others in this thread have not said what you are saying. They criticize any cyclist that gets in their way at any time.
 
Originally Posted By: addyguy


Yeah, there are a few that ride properly, but not enough that I feel guilty calling almost all cyclists ignorant idiots. I hate 'em - when they get hit, they deserve it.


wow.


I'd imagine it's hard to be you, what with so many people irritating you on a daily basis. reversing the lopsided reasoning, are all drivers ignorant idiots? I guess that would include you?
you've got some anger issues to work out for sure. did your Dad not hug you enough when you were little?
 
so many people in here talking like 'cyclists' are a separate species, but I'm sure most if not all of them are also drivers.
sure some cyclists think they are running their own private Tour de France on a curvy backroad early sunday morning; how different is that than the guy w/ a porsche thinking that same road is his own private road course?
maybe we should all realize that drivers AND cyclists can be equally inconsiderate (because they are).
but then taking the leap that someones boorish behavior 'deserves' a horrifying death or dismemberment? then we as a society seriously have a problem.
I often ride alone or with one other cyclist and I resent it when some yahoo in a car thinks he can use me as target, or yell for me to get off the road as he buzzes me at twice the posted limit.

a little bit of common concern for the welfare of your fellowman would go a long way.
 
Originally Posted By: addyguy


Yeah, there are a few that ride properly, but not enough that I feel guilty calling almsot all cyclists ignorant idiots. I hate 'em - when they get hit, they deserve it.


Wow...easily one of the most ignorant comments I've ever read on this board.

edit to remove insult to addyguy
 
Last edited:
The way I see it, I pay vehicle registration taxes, inspection fees, plate fees, license fees and all of this so that I can use the road in my car. Bikes don't do that down here (though in some places I'm sure they do). So just because some yuppie douche wants to play spandex dress up so he can feel special and get the attention he craves by blocking traffic doesn't mean I should be late to work from being stuck behind him on the roads I helped pay for.

However, I am happy to report that just this morning I saw a nice contingent of bright yellow Lance Armstrongs speeding along the bike bridge, next to the road. They seemed happy, and were certainly unimpeded by the quality of the bridge. I've seen these guys riding before, and they're generally on point with the hand signals and attuned to stop signs when they're on the road (which is in places were there are no bike friendly alternatives). I actually commented to my wife the other day when we saw these guys riding that they were the only cyclists I've ever seen who signal their intentions and respect road signs.
 
Originally Posted By: greenaccord02
The way I see it, I pay vehicle registration taxes, inspection fees, plate fees, license fees and all of this so that I can use the road in my car. Bikes don't do that down here (though in some places I'm sure they do). So just because some yuppie douche wants to play spandex dress up so he can feel special and get the attention he craves by blocking traffic doesn't mean I should be late to work from being stuck behind him on the roads I helped pay for.



You do realize that overwhelmingly those yuppie douche's pay taxes and own and drive cars, too? I'm one of them, so I should know.

I don't know why I've bothered commenting at all in this thread. I learned long ago that nothing draws out stupid on the internet like the words "cyclist" and "pitbull". As a pitbull-owning cyclist, I should really know better...

As far as the repeated Lance Armstrong references though, you folks are dating yourself. I'm going to start referring to every driver I see as Al Unser (or Ayrton Senna if they have a wing in the back).
 
No way would I ride a bike near a road with motor vehicles. They are currently building a 20 plus mile rails to trail bike-walking only path near me and seriously thinking of purchasing a bike for that and start riding again.
 
Well, what about solutions instead of more finger-pointing? We can point fingers and cry about who wronged who all day long.

I saw a very nice bulletin board in one of the local elementary schools about bicycle safety. I wish they would push the topic more in schools considering how many kids are on bikes 8 months out of the year.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom