This filter was pulled off our 06 Pathfinder. 80% highway driving. Looks like it did it's job but i'm not impress with the looks of it. I'm may switch to the Fram Xtended Guard like the Civic, which i've been very impress with.
PureOne 14610 (4,700 miles / 1 Year)
- Thread starter Silver02ex
- Start date
- Status
It looks fine and it did its job. I would be curious about the Fram but I doubt it would be any better or any other brand name filter for that matter.
what filter is this?
Originally Posted By: crazyoildude
what filter is this?
Look at the title.. PureOne 14610
what filter is this?
Look at the title.. PureOne 14610
Used many PL14610's for longer miles/same time oci's in a Honda and Altima than this, and all have looked great. This is possibly the worst looking of the 14610/12 Puros and Puro varients that size I've seen posted here recently. Media looks fairly dark too. As said though, looks like it did it's job. But, since you're very impressed with the higher priced XG though, you should likely go with it.
Thanks for the pics.
Thanks for the pics.
Don't like the large spaced pleats near the seam - I don't recall seeing this on previous PL14610s. Wonder if Purolator is reducing the number of pleats in some of their filters.
Silver02ex - could you please count the number of pleats, including the seam with the metal crimp. I want to see if the number of pleats is the same as previous PL14610s I've cut open.
Silver02ex - could you please count the number of pleats, including the seam with the metal crimp. I want to see if the number of pleats is the same as previous PL14610s I've cut open.
looks like it did its job?
Take a look at the very center of the first picture---is that a tear in the media, or a bad angle/reflection of the camera?
Take a look at the very center of the first picture---is that a tear in the media, or a bad angle/reflection of the camera?
Looks almost like it was run on a Nissan V6...
Originally Posted By: steve20
Take a look at the very center of the first picture---is that a tear in the media, or a bad angle/reflection of the camera?
Probably a reflection off the oil. If there was a tear, it would be near the base of the pleats that are kind of bent over.
Take a look at the very center of the first picture---is that a tear in the media, or a bad angle/reflection of the camera?
Probably a reflection off the oil. If there was a tear, it would be near the base of the pleats that are kind of bent over.
Originally Posted By: steve20
looks like it did its job?
Take a look at the very center of the first picture---is that a tear in the media, or a bad angle/reflection of the camera?
There was no tear. However, I did pulled a PureOne 25288 that had a tear in it. It's because of the faiedl P1 I had in the past and this filter, I think I will be heading to a different direction.
looks like it did its job?
Take a look at the very center of the first picture---is that a tear in the media, or a bad angle/reflection of the camera?
There was no tear. However, I did pulled a PureOne 25288 that had a tear in it. It's because of the faiedl P1 I had in the past and this filter, I think I will be heading to a different direction.
Originally Posted By: daves87rs
Looks decent to me-what oil was used?
QS 5w30 Green Bottle SM
Looks decent to me-what oil was used?
QS 5w30 Green Bottle SM
Originally Posted By: fxrider
Why go to fram? you can get a Puralator for
3.27 @ wal-mart now..
When you find a PureOne has issues like this:
http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubb...rue#Post2176067
And a Fram Xtended Guard that looks like this:
http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubb...rue#Post2421453
This is from MY personal experience, not someone else. I use to be impress with P1 but not so much anymore.
Why go to fram? you can get a Puralator for
3.27 @ wal-mart now..When you find a PureOne has issues like this:
http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubb...rue#Post2176067
And a Fram Xtended Guard that looks like this:
http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubb...rue#Post2421453
This is from MY personal experience, not someone else. I use to be impress with P1 but not so much anymore.
Originally Posted By: sayjac
Used many PL14610's for longer miles/same time oci's in a Honda and Altima than this, and all have looked great. This is possibly the worst looking of the 14610/12 Puros and Puro varients that size I've seen posted here recently. Media looks fairly dark too. As said though, looks like it did it's job. But, since you're very impressed with the higher priced XG though, you should likely go with it.
Thanks for the pics.
This XG has always showed a very consistant results. I'm not saying the P1 is a bad filter, however I've been having more and more problems with them the last 2-3 that were cut open. If you do a search you will see that other P1 14610 has shown great results in the past but not so much lately.
Used many PL14610's for longer miles/same time oci's in a Honda and Altima than this, and all have looked great. This is possibly the worst looking of the 14610/12 Puros and Puro varients that size I've seen posted here recently. Media looks fairly dark too. As said though, looks like it did it's job. But, since you're very impressed with the higher priced XG though, you should likely go with it.
Thanks for the pics.
This XG has always showed a very consistant results. I'm not saying the P1 is a bad filter, however I've been having more and more problems with them the last 2-3 that were cut open. If you do a search you will see that other P1 14610 has shown great results in the past but not so much lately.
Originally Posted By: ZeeOSix
Silver02ex - could you please count the number of pleats on that PL14610, including the seam with the metal crimp. I want to see if the number of pleats is the same as previous PL14610s I've cut open.
I'll post the results tomorrow
Silver02ex - could you please count the number of pleats on that PL14610, including the seam with the metal crimp. I want to see if the number of pleats is the same as previous PL14610s I've cut open.
I'll post the results tomorrow
Quote:
looks like it did its job?
Take a look at the very center of the first picture---is that a tear in the media, or a bad angle/reflection of the camera?
You mean the widened pleat that the OP specifically aimed, and shot the picture of and then said "looks like it did it's job".....? Did you mean that he overlooked and/or failed to mention a tear, when he said "looks like it did it's job"?.... In this case, because there is no tear.
As seen here previously, pics 'seem' to show things that the OP's either never note and/or specifically say aren't there. Because of camera angle and/or reflection pics seems to show things that aren't there.
looks like it did its job?
Take a look at the very center of the first picture---is that a tear in the media, or a bad angle/reflection of the camera?
You mean the widened pleat that the OP specifically aimed, and shot the picture of and then said "looks like it did it's job".....? Did you mean that he overlooked and/or failed to mention a tear, when he said "looks like it did it's job"?.... In this case, because there is no tear.
As seen here previously, pics 'seem' to show things that the OP's either never note and/or specifically say aren't there. Because of camera angle and/or reflection pics seems to show things that aren't there.
try a bosch 3323 or an oem denso equivalent from rockauto. My gf's civic has the same size filter , and the bosch according to the specs has a higher filtration ( or finer micron filter rate, i forget ) rate than the p1 in that size.
- Status
Similar threads
