This prefilling nonsense is a joke. Unless your oil change takes several weeks there is always a film of oil left in an engine. People already spoke of different accidents causing an engine to run without oil for minutes. So an engine is never 100% dry regardless of what you do or don't do to the new filter.
When you start an engine after an oil change I sure hope there is no load on it, right? So an engine without load cannot possibly cause much damage to any part just because oil film is little bit thinner than usual.
What difference does it make if you do prefill anyway? Does it make the new oil start flowing what, 1 second sooner, 2, 3, 4,....???? What exactly is the difference? If prefilling only causes new oil flow delay to be 1 second less then it is clearly not worth the trouble.
As a final reality check, keep in mind that more important than filter being empty of full is viscosity at startup.
higher viscosity = slow oil flow = takes longer for oil to reach engine parts
Consider your typical oil change is done during a nice day, say 70ish degrees, sunny, etc. A typical 5W30 at 40C is 60ish cSt, so already your new oil is around 100 cSt. It should flow farily nice and fast I am guessing.
Now consider my Mazda this morning already full of old oil and presumably a full oil filter at -20C. Using say Shell's 5W30 CCS 5446 cSt @ -30C, so I will guess it was around 4K cSt at -20 this morning (actually I use a different oil but have this spec handy at moment) So my oil despite full oil filter has to force its way throughout engine at 4,000 cSt!!!!!! That is 40X viscosity of your average oil change on a nice day!!!
My guess is that my startup on a cold winter morning is far worse, far more damaging then not prefilling a filter!!!! And you don't want to ask people west of me (western Canada) about their -30 and -40C weather!!!! Still their engine somehow survivie.
So I hope this prefilling waste of time [censored] discussion stops at last. Even the good old M1 vs Syntec fights were more entertaining that this s....
When you start an engine after an oil change I sure hope there is no load on it, right? So an engine without load cannot possibly cause much damage to any part just because oil film is little bit thinner than usual.
What difference does it make if you do prefill anyway? Does it make the new oil start flowing what, 1 second sooner, 2, 3, 4,....???? What exactly is the difference? If prefilling only causes new oil flow delay to be 1 second less then it is clearly not worth the trouble.
As a final reality check, keep in mind that more important than filter being empty of full is viscosity at startup.
higher viscosity = slow oil flow = takes longer for oil to reach engine parts
Consider your typical oil change is done during a nice day, say 70ish degrees, sunny, etc. A typical 5W30 at 40C is 60ish cSt, so already your new oil is around 100 cSt. It should flow farily nice and fast I am guessing.
Now consider my Mazda this morning already full of old oil and presumably a full oil filter at -20C. Using say Shell's 5W30 CCS 5446 cSt @ -30C, so I will guess it was around 4K cSt at -20 this morning (actually I use a different oil but have this spec handy at moment) So my oil despite full oil filter has to force its way throughout engine at 4,000 cSt!!!!!! That is 40X viscosity of your average oil change on a nice day!!!
My guess is that my startup on a cold winter morning is far worse, far more damaging then not prefilling a filter!!!! And you don't want to ask people west of me (western Canada) about their -30 and -40C weather!!!! Still their engine somehow survivie.
So I hope this prefilling waste of time [censored] discussion stops at last. Even the good old M1 vs Syntec fights were more entertaining that this s....