Originally Posted by Imp4
Originally Posted by OilReport99
That is correct. Now, since this is BITOG, can we use the correct terms if we already know them?
I think each member gets to choose individually what to use. -
agreed; if this were some industry working group or academic discussion then one could, for clarity's sake, make the case for using "correct" terms and not colloquialisms. But that's not what we have here. We have an eclectic mix, from the academic to the shade tree mechanic to the DIYer, of varying knowledge levels and command of, or lack thereof, the different terminologies should not be a hurdle in discussion participation.
I also think we should acknowledge that others' choices don't make them intellectually less than ourselves. -
agreed; as I stated previously, using colloquial terms is "proof" of nothing. To suggest someone is unknowledgeable about a topic because they choose to use colloquial terms is, IMO, arrogance/snobbery, at least in this setting. A person's knowledge on a subject should be predicated on the substance of what's said.
Originally Posted by Gebo
I'm gonna print this post and carry it to my safety deposit box for safe keeping.
...‚...‚...‚
Originally Posted by Imp4
Originally Posted by RDY4WAR
It's grade, not weight. End of story.
Except you're not in charge.
And the thread has documented many professionals in the industry working with the colloquialism as has been discussed.
Don't get me wrong, it's important for you to do you.
You're free to draw the same conclusions that you've already made perfectly clear.
Just please be aware that there are many folks (professionals and industry leading organizations included) out there getting along quite well that you would mis-categorize.
Cheers!!!
+1