OIL "Cushion" for bearings..

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Oct 9, 2004
Messages
6,728
Location
New Braunfels
I did a search to see how many times this term was used in this forum and It was countless. Does this cause anyone else anguish to see this term in reference to a fluid?


My Pet peeve is semantic errors. They cause inaccuracy in peoples perceptions.

Cushion I know is often used to imply the ability to protect parts from shock. The problem is that this paradigm cannot be true according to the laws of physics.

The proper term for a layer of oil that separates two parts is a "Film" If we are talking about the bearings oil is of no shock absorbing value. Being a liquid it does not compress. So regardless of viscosity as long as that oil has enough volume and replacement flow from the oil pump to keep that bearing full of lubricant the bearing will remain protected and the film will keep the parts from touching.

Regardless of temperature or the oils relative viscosity (so long as the oil is not volatizing into a vapor or solidified and has enough replacement volume from pump age)it will provide a film in these bearings. Once the bearings have a film separating the parts the volume of oil that is required to provide that film is constant, regardless of viscosity. Is a thicker oil going to enlarge the bearing and compress the crank to fit more oil in between the surfaces? Nope. What a thicker oil does is leak out of bearings more slowly. the issue with this large clearance thick oil approach has always been that equilibrium is rarely reached. The oil keeps getting hotter and thus thinner and oil pressure begins to drop off.

This is where my hypothesis of this improper use of "Cushion " may have begun.
To counter viscosoity loss due to heat and therefore pressure loss this racers often added thicker and thicker oils to maintain oil pressure for their events( as well as mechanical aids such as oil coolers). I think this is where the term "Cushion" evolved in regards to race oils. The thicker oil did provide a "cushion". But this was in terms of enough viscosity that at the highest intensity (oil temperature) expected that the oil viscosity would remain thick enough to maintain pressure through these large clearance race engines.
 
The only place it can be "squeezed out" is in locations that are not pressurized. Such as Cam lobes and in modern engines these are relatively low pressure , low friction interfaces. And to tell the truth I see little reason why a more viscous oil is more protective in this situation other than it takes more energy to move it out of the way.

In crank bearings what seems to matter is having adequate volume to maintain a film.
You also reach a point of equilibrium where although a more viscous fluid may escape the bearing more slowly it is also replaces more slowly. As the fluid is thinned it escapes more quickly but is also replaced equally as quickly.
 
The bearing runs slightly off center with the journal towards the loaded side. Force on the bearing is what moves it off center, so yes there is some movement in reaction to force. We are talking a few 10 thousands of an inch. The lower the oil viscosity, the further off center. The more viscous the oil, the closer to the center and the thicker the film or whatever you prefer to call it.

With a reasonable range of viscosities in a normal engine, the difference isn't big enough to be concerned about unless you are a bearing designer.

There is more to making a journal bearing live then keeping it full. It needs enough extra flow to cool the bearings.
 
The bearing runs slightly off center with the journal towards the loaded side. Force on the bearing is what moves it off center, so yes there is some movement in reaction to force. We are talking a few 10 thousands of an inch. The lower the oil viscosity, the further off center. The more viscous the oil, the closer to the center and the thicker the film or whatever you prefer to call it.>>>

True that there may be deflection off center but the volume remains required remains a constant and the differences of deflections between viscosities as far as I can tell are purely hypothetical and I have not seen even mathmatical illustrations or testing data to confirm this theory.


With a reasonable range of viscosities in a normal engine, the difference isn't big enough to be concerned about unless you are a bearing designer.>>>


True too

There is more to making a journal bearing live then keeping it full. It needs enough extra flow to cool the bearings. >>>>

Extremly relavent. More volume traveling through a bearing in a given time would mean more heat transfer.
 
Originally Posted By: Bryanccfshr
The only place it can be "squeezed out" is in locations that are not pressurized.



Journal bearings have clearance on the sides. Pressures on the loaded side run a few hundred psi and oil is squeezed out the side. Oil pump pressure it just to get oil to the low pressure side of the bearing. The wedge effect is what builds up actual operating pressure.
 
OK, in these terms I can see how a more viscous fluid would take longer to exit.

I am somewhat aware that one side of the bearing is mechanically pressurized while the other side is open. The oil pump primarily maintains an adequate oil volume .

But do you agree that "Cushion" is the wrong term for this application?
 
Last edited:
I am not contesting that at all. I do wish to see more comprehensive documentation on film deflection (such as what we have all seen in the old Noria article).

I would also like to get your take on the use of the word "cushion" .
 
Originally Posted By: Bryanccfshr
OK, in these terms I can see how a more viscous fluid would take longer to exit.

1. I am somewhat aware that one side of the bearing is mechanically pressurized while the other side is open. The oil pump primarily maintains an adequate oil volume .

2. But do you agree that "Cushion" is the wrong term for this application?


1. A journal bearing can and does lose oil on both sides all the way around.

2. Do a search on some bearing design literature, the term cushion is used in the business. I don't think it's that common (I've been away from bearing design about 10 years and it was just a very occasional thing for me), but it's used and bearing designers know what it means.

What makes my socks roll up and down is someone calling a "hydrodynamic wedge" a "film"
shocked2.gif
11.gif
 
I'll try to dig up some documentation for you. I wouldn't use the word "cushion" personally since I don't view it as a precise, technical word but it doesn't irritate me to see it used. I get more irritated by other things (i.e. like those who are ignorant and unaware of their ignorance)...I'm far from being pet peeve-less. :)
 
What makes my socks roll up and down is someone calling a "hydrodynamic wedge" a "film"

LOL You got me!! I haven't spent time around here reading the technical portions in a long time.

You of course are correct and I am rusty with my trib terms.
 
The squeeze film effect does dampen shock loadings to a fairly great degree.

Classic example is when doing a turbine alignment. The bearings are big (20" diameter, and 19" wide at the generator supporting 40 tonnes). To rotate the shaft, it fist has to be "jacked", by injecting oil between the bearing lower, and the shaft.

It will take 10-15 minutes for the ISO32 oil to squeeze out when the oil is off to get a stable dial.

Not sure that the term "cushion" is necessarily correct or incorrect.

In some ways, it's like pushing magnets together, the closer they get the greater is the separating force. But it's not in another, as the leakage allows the wedge to decrease, ultimately to failure point if loaded enough.
 
It seems to me to be more analogous with buoyancy. The journal floating on a flowing river of oil.


Slightly off topic..
On your turbine example, during outages when periodic ratcheting occurs how is lubrication controlled? Is the load so low during ratcheting that the lubrication system does not have to be online. I see this often where we isolate the lubrication system for maintenance on large industrial turbines.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: Bryanccfshr
The only place it can be "squeezed out" is in locations that are not pressurized. Such as Cam lobes and in modern engines these are relatively low pressure , low friction interfaces. And to tell the truth I see little reason why a more viscous oil is more protective in this situation other than it takes more energy to move it out of the way.

In crank bearings what seems to matter is having adequate volume to maintain a film.
You also reach a point of equilibrium where although a more viscous fluid may escape the bearing more slowly it is also replaces more slowly. As the fluid is thinned it escapes more quickly but is also replaced equally as quickly.



Frankly and without offending anyone named Frank, I have to politely disagree that oil can only be queezed out where the area being lubricated is not pressurized.

I saw a video, and dangummit if I can't find it right now, where an engine had a clear plastic oil pan. There was a camera set up under this engine. I remember specifically that the oil lubricating the crankshaft journals...which, and correct me if I am wrong, is under constant and high pressure oil, was spitting out along the journals. The oil has to go somewhere. It isn't only going to stay in the immediate area of the bearing. It was literally flying off of this crankshaft at a trmendous rate of speed.

I hope I haven't made an idiot of myself and either misunderstood the question or quoted the wrong post. Have a good weekend.
 
I don't think it is incorrect to view a liquid film as having the ability to "cushion." To me, that word is relevant not for static loads but for shock loads, as might happen in bearings at TDC and BDC, or in the valvetrain as slack is taken up. I don't doubt that a very thin film could have an absolutely critical cushioning ability between hardened metal parts that would otherwise contact one another with extremely high momentary loads. Think of the difference between a steel ball being dropped on a concrete floor and a steel ball being dropped on even the thinnest carpet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom