A couple of thoughts, but first:
http://www.barrystiretech.com/nitrogeninflation.html
That's what I wrote up about nitrogen inflation. 2 points.
1) Lab tests show no difference in rolling resistance. So any fleet that experiences an improvement in fuel economy must be getting it from some place other than the nitrogen itself. Likely suspects: Improved maintenance practices, improved retention of inflation pressure, improved vehicles - and the list could go on.
2) While there aren't any lab tests for tire wear (pretty expensive to run), but there is no reason to believe that just the difference in inflation medium would change tire wear. The mechanisms for tire wear are driven by a lot of things, but because air and nitrogen behave virtually the same, that can NOT be a reason for a wear improvement. So any fleet that experiences a wear improvement likely got that from another source. Like suspects: Improved maintenance practices, improved retention of inflation pressure, generational improvements in the tires - and the list could go on.
I find it supecious that no mention is made of an improvement in pressure retention between pressure checks. I think that means they didn't make any - and if I were running the test, I would [censored] well be SURE that I could document that as that is a MAJOR benefit that is being touted!
Now onto the comments made about Ed's comments:
We can NOT be sure WHY somebody did something - and that includes the FAA. We can verify that aircraft tires are required to be inflated with nitrogen. We can verify they buy nitrogen in 1500 psi bottles. We can verify that aircraft tires are sometimes inflated to 350 psi. We can verify the nitrogen does not support fire.
But we can only guess as to the motivation behind the regulation. Is it just because everyone uses the convenient nitrogen bottles and not a specially built air compressor and that the regulation takes advantage of what is easy to do. I don't know, but it's possible.
It's also possible that the fire issue drove them to adopt a certain way of doing things. But we'll never know unless we can contact someone who was involved with the writing of the regulation.