New: Shell Rotella T6 0w40

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: Finn
Thanks, looked through the article twice and still missed that part.


I just got lucky. It jumped out at me when I skimmed the article. I found it interesting because I haven't personally seen any CJ-4/SN lubes yet, but obviously lots of CJ-4/SM ones.
 
Originally Posted By: dnewton3
Interesting product placement. Will lead to the T5 0w- products being phased out. Should be a reasonable product for extreme wearther places (ie - parts of the Canadian and AK markets that truly see viciously cold weather).

I predict it will become the next "gotta have" lube for just about everyone who labors under the belief that their little diesel or gasser-turbo cannot survive those uber-cold starts in TN, and AL, and NM, and VA, and WV, and ...

You know; because it's "better".


I'm not going to worry about what "might" be OK when I know T6 WILL be OK.
 
I use the T6 in my Jeep because it's a solid oil and it's pretty reasonably priced. Hmm, too bad the new 0W-40 isn't available down here right now, as I'd save the T6 I currently have (and will be using for a change in my Jeep tomorrow) for my mom's Jeep and get some 0W-40 for mine.

If I can get the 0W-40 without driving to Canada, I probably will, as T6 5W-40 is still pretty thick when it's 0* out, and for a good bit of winter, starts in the single digits are a common occurrence in Rochester. I've thought about swapping to M1 0W-40 for this exact reason, but haven't wanted to spend the extra $$$.
 
I get M1 0w40 for $6.79/qt, and RT6 for $5.00/qt at my local Meijer. I think it would be worth the extra $9 for an oil change to get the added benefit of a 0W oil for winter use. Since you're putting it in a gasoline engine, it will be fine.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: 440Magnum
Originally Posted By: Indydriver
What is the rationale for using these oils in gas burning cars?


Non-roller lifters with high spring pressures in older gasoline engines. Really that's the sole reason. I use it in my Jeep 4.0s, and I had been running it in the old 440 v8s until I switched them over to M1 0w40, which also has a strong enough additive pack for their cams and spring pressures.

Its not even really necessary for the Jeeps- they'd do fine on any SN 5w30 oil out there. But its a little extra insurance, and the 4.0 actually turns in (usually) better objective UOA numbers and subjective sound/smoothness on 40-weight oil anyway. Its a little gasoline engine that thinks its a Cummins when you look at its torque curve.

For winter use as you say any 5w30 would be a far better choice
than the heavy T6 or even M1 0W-40 if the M1 price deters some.
If you want a higher ZDDP level then go with something like QS Defy 5w30 which is pretty cheap.
 
I want to note something here. I am not mentioning this as a moderator, but as a member.

Most of this banter is moot, because there is no application specific to the conversration; we have NO idea what the products would be used in, nor for how long. This topic is typical of a BITOG thread; all talk and no constraint.

Here's a perfect example:
Originally Posted By: A_Harman
I get M1 0w40 for $6.79/qt, and RT6 for $5.00/qt at my local Meijer. I think it would be worth the extra $9 for an oil change to get the added benefit of a 0W oil for winter use. Since you're putting it in a gasoline engine, it will be fine.


Great. But under what pretext for what application?

This thread started about a new HDEO product for uber-cold markets. Now it's droned into contrasting T6 to a non-HDEO lube (M1 0w-40). OK - the M1 0w-40 is "CF" rated, but that's practially worthless to a typical diesel we'd see in use here. That is WAY different than the new Rotella 0w-40 of the OPs interest.

On top of that, just how is the M1 "better" than T6? Until you define the operating condtions and maintenance plan, you have no ability to define what "better" really means. Is it "better" in that it makes you sleep well at night? Probably. But just what application has it proven itself to be "better" with reduced wear to a degree that can be PROVEN with statistical evidence, showing the ROI has been met or exceeded? You made the statment; show me the proof, please.

Reminds me of an analogy I have used here in the past. There is the quintisential debate in the hunting world about which is the "better" hunting round (.308win vs. .30-06). Both are fine rounds, sending similar bullets down range at similar velocities. There are mutliple choices for bullet weight, design and speed that confound the debate. But you have to ask youself this; in what application would one be "better"? Because they are both, in fact, complete overkill for hunting squirrel!

And so goes this topic you two have raised about M1 0w-40 and T6. One isn't even qualified as an HDEO applicable to today's market, and they both likely are WAY over-qualified for a normal OCI application in a gasser. Harman is willing to pay an extra $9 for an oil that is likely way more than he needs, and where any number of lesser costly lubes would perform fine. Between the T6 and M1, they both are a waste; one is just a bigger waste than the other. I FULLY AND COMPLETELY REALIZE AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO DO AS YOU SEE FIT, but that does not make it a rational decision. Gassers don't "need" HDEOs, period. Do they work well? Sure they do, but that can be said of a whole slew of other market choices.

I see the OPs signature line and I note that he uses premium syns for his two gasser applications, in reasonably normal OCI durations. That is overkill. Folks, it does not get THAT cold in his area where a 0w-40 HDEO (the product of interest to him) would be a necessity. Nearly everyone here is fulfilling my prophesey; they are jumping onto the newest offering, with no idea how to decide if it's a rational choice (or at least no outward evidence of such).

There is a HUGE difference between what can work, and what is "best". "Best" can only be proven with a lot of dedication and time and money; it takes a lot of resources and determination to accurately define what is "best" in any application.

Unless you choose to define "best" as what makes you sleep well at night, knowing that there are no measurables other than your REM sleep.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: dnewton3
Miller88

The average low temps for some small towns in the lower/mid Adirondak NY area are this:
Indian Lake: +5F
Little Falls: +9F
Those are avearge lows. There will occasionally be temps colder than that; true. The low temp sigma is fairly consistent in that general area.

I looked up the NOAA temp data logs for the last three years for several towns in the Adirondak area (all the way up to Massena), using January/February temps (the coldest months), and applied rng (random number generation) to select dates for 45 samples. The standard deviation allows 95% of the temps in that area around no lower than -7 degrees F. It will get colder, but not with any regularity whatsoever. In fact, it typically will only be near zero F or higher. Last year was a warmer year; 2009 was a colder year; that is why I used multiple data years and dates.

In fact, the RECORD lows for those two towns are as follows:
Little Falls: -30 in 1943
Indian Lake: -39 in 1957

You stated this:
Quote:
"-20F isn't out of the question where I live ... -30F isn't out of the question where my parents live"

I guess this would depend upon how you define "out of the question" ...
Is is possible that temps will get that cold? Yes.
Is it probable that temps will get that cold? No.
Is it "normal" that temps well get that cold? Absolutely not.

Are you colder than TN, AL, WV? Yes, you are. But you are not so cold as to warrant the necessity of a synthetic 0w-40 product; you don't "need" such a product in that general area. Those very few days when it might be below -10, will not result in automatic refusal of the engine to start, or assured destruction of bearings.

Obviously, the specific application to which you might apply your lubes would have impact on this discussion; older IDI diesel engines with weak batteries, for example. Or a manually started snow blower (pull-start) that is stored outside. Those might warrant a thinner start lube; ignition dependent, of course.

But my generall comment a few posts back stands, and your example is proof. When speaking of temps, most folks don't really research the factual basis for selecting a lube. They merely buy the percieved "best" presuming that they "need" it.

This product (Rotella T6 0w-40) is going to displace the T5 0W products in extreme north markets. And I seriously doubt that the new product is so much "better" than 99% of us would ever be able to distinguish tangible differences in cold start functions, down here. Yes - there a select few in upper Canada and Alaska who will definitely benefit, but not any of us in the lower 48.

I would entertain any facts you have to challenge my analysis.



My folks are a bit north of little falls, but at a significantly higher elevation.

It's not constant -30, but late January and in early February, there's 4 or 5 -30 nights and maybe 10 or so -20 nights.

I doubt a 0w30 vs 5w30 (or 5w-40 vs 0w-40) would make a difference in cold starting ability or engine life but it's a piece of mind - ya know? The engine stops making funny noises a few seconds quicker.

You've never heard a Jeep 4.0 make funny noises until it's -30 out. Sounds like an old tractor trailer starting.
 
Yeah. My 5.9 has never made any funny noises at startup, other than an occasional half-second of lifter clatter, even starting at 0* with T6 in it, and oil pressure still comes right up, the engine really doesn't seem to care. Going to a 0W would be strictly for piece of mind (although I'll skip it this time, I've already got T6 ready to go for the next change, which I'll doing in a few minutes).
 
Originally Posted By: dnewton3
I want to note something here. I am not mentioning this as a moderator, but as a member.

Most of this banter is moot, because there is no application specific to the conversration; we have NO idea what the products would be used in, nor for how long. This topic is typical of a BITOG thread; all talk and no constraint.

Here's a perfect example:
Originally Posted By: A_Harman
I get M1 0w40 for $6.79/qt, and RT6 for $5.00/qt at my local Meijer. I think it would be worth the extra $9 for an oil change to get the added benefit of a 0W oil for winter use. Since you're putting it in a gasoline engine, it will be fine.


Great. But under what pretext for what application?

This thread started about a new HDEO product for uber-cold markets. Now it's droned into contrasting T6 to a non-HDEO lube (M1 0w-40). OK - the M1 0w-40 is "CF" rated, but that's practially worthless to a typical diesel we'd see in use here. That is WAY different than the new Rotella 0w-40 of the OPs interest.

On top of that, just how is the M1 "better" than T6? Until you define the operating condtions and maintenance plan, you have no ability to define what "better" really means. Is it "better" in that it makes you sleep well at night? Probably. But just what application has it proven itself to be "better" with reduced wear to a degree that can be PROVEN with statistical evidence, showing the ROI has been met or exceeded? You made the statment; show me the proof, please.

Reminds me of an analogy I have used here in the past. There is the quintisential debate in the hunting world about which is the "better" hunting round (.308win vs. .30-06). Both are fine rounds, sending similar bullets down range at similar velocities. There are mutliple choices for bullet weight, design and speed that confound the debate. But you have to ask youself this; in what application would one be "better"? Because they are both, in fact, complete overkill for hunting squirrel!

And so goes this topic you two have raised about M1 0w-40 and T6. One isn't even qualified as an HDEO applicable to today's market, and they both likely are WAY over-qualified for a normal OCI application in a gasser. Harman is willing to pay an extra $9 for an oil that is likely way more than he needs, and where any number of lesser costly lubes would perform fine. Between the T6 and M1, they both are a waste; one is just a bigger waste than the other. I FULLY AND COMPLETELY REALIZE AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO DO AS YOU SEE FIT, but that does not make it a rational decision. Gassers don't "need" HDEOs, period. Do they work well? Sure they do, but that can be said of a whole slew of other market choices.

I see the OPs signature line and I note that he uses premium syns for his two gasser applications, in reasonably normal OCI durations. That is overkill. Folks, it does not get THAT cold in his area where a 0w-40 HDEO (the product of interest to him) would be a necessity. Nearly everyone here is fulfilling my prophesey; they are jumping onto the newest offering, with no idea how to decide if it's a rational choice (or at least no outward evidence of such).

There is a HUGE difference between what can work, and what is "best". "Best" can only be proven with a lot of dedication and time and money; it takes a lot of resources and determination to accurately define what is "best" in any application.

Unless you choose to define "best" as what makes you sleep well at night, knowing that there are no measurables other than your REM sleep.






There are some pitfalls with posting on internet message boards. Since I was posting my note right below rslifkin's, I thought it would be clear that I was responding to him. You have written that the oil's application was not defined enough to make a recommendation, where it was clear in my mind that I was recommending a dedicated long-life gasoline engine oil for a Chrysler 360 gasoline engine where the owner was concerned about getting the best possible cold-start performance.
 
Originally Posted By: fauxchemist
mobil is a better oil, that provides better mpg compared to the new oil by shell

Pardon? How exactly is mobil better. Since they don't made an Hdeo in a 0w-40 flavour you are comparing apples to oranges,and your comment isnt applicable to the topic.
I can't wait to see this new oil on the shelves. It will be going into my forklift as soon as I see it on the shelves.
 
Originally Posted By: Clevy
How exactly is mobil better. Since they don't made an Hdeo in a 0w-40 flavour you are comparing apples to oranges,and your comment isnt applicable to the topic.


Actually they do, Delvac 1 ESP 0w-40.
wink.gif
 
Just curious as to what you are basing your judgment on? I ask as I have been unable to find any info about this oil other than the short press blurb.... Unless you have insider info, it seems a bit premature to me......
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: dnewton3
Originally Posted By: Miller88
Originally Posted By: dnewton3
Interesting product placement. Will lead to the T5 0w- products being phased out. Should be a reasonable product for extreme wearther places (ie - parts of the Canadian and AK markets that truly see viciously cold weather).

I predict it will become the next "gotta have" lube for just about everyone who labors under the belief that their little diesel or gasser-turbo cannot survive those uber-cold starts in TN, and AL, and NM, and VA, and WV, and ...

You know; because it's "better".



-20F isn't out of the question where I live ... -30F isn't out of the question where my parents live (only 70 miles away).



Are you speaking of windchill or ambient temps?

You might RARELY get down that cold ambient, but those would not be typical aveage lows.

It ONCE got down to -36F in Indy several years ago, but our average low is only +18F.

Where is "CNY"; is that central New York state?


Considering you're "wind temp"/ambient temp point I, for years thought that wind chill was what to pay attention to when it came to whatever fluid I might use. However, I found out a few years ago that wind chill doesn't affect fluids at all such as the gel point of diesel or the weight of oil we use.

Is this correct because using ambient temperature works as far as diesel is concerned. works with the gel point of diesel.
 
Originally Posted By: dnewton3
I want to note something here. I am not mentioning this as a moderator, but as a member.

Most of this banter is moot, because there is no application specific to the conversration; we have NO idea what the products would be used in, nor for how long. This topic is typical of a BITOG thread; all talk and no constraint.

Here's a perfect example:
Originally Posted By: A_Harman
I get M1 0w40 for $6.79/qt, and RT6 for $5.00/qt at my local Meijer. I think it would be worth the extra $9 for an oil change to get the added benefit of a 0W oil for winter use. Since you're putting it in a gasoline engine, it will be fine.


Great. But under what pretext for what application?

This thread started about a new HDEO product for uber-cold markets. Now it's droned into contrasting T6 to a non-HDEO lube (M1 0w-40). OK - the M1 0w-40 is "CF" rated, but that's practially worthless to a typical diesel we'd see in use here. That is WAY different than the new Rotella 0w-40 of the OPs interest.

On top of that, just how is the M1 "better" than T6? Until you define the operating condtions and maintenance plan, you have no ability to define what "better" really means. Is it "better" in that it makes you sleep well at night? Probably. But just what application has it proven itself to be "better" with reduced wear to a degree that can be PROVEN with statistical evidence, showing the ROI has been met or exceeded? You made the statment; show me the proof, please.

Reminds me of an analogy I have used here in the past. There is the quintisential debate in the hunting world about which is the "better" hunting round (.308win vs. .30-06). Both are fine rounds, sending similar bullets down range at similar velocities. There are mutliple choices for bullet weight, design and speed that confound the debate. But you have to ask youself this; in what application would one be "better"? Because they are both, in fact, complete overkill for hunting squirrel!

And so goes this topic you two have raised about M1 0w-40 and T6. One isn't even qualified as an HDEO applicable to today's market, and they both likely are WAY over-qualified for a normal OCI application in a gasser. Harman is willing to pay an extra $9 for an oil that is likely way more than he needs, and where any number of lesser costly lubes would perform fine. Between the T6 and M1, they both are a waste; one is just a bigger waste than the other. I FULLY AND COMPLETELY REALIZE AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO DO AS YOU SEE FIT, but that does not make it a rational decision. Gassers don't "need" HDEOs, period. Do they work well? Sure they do, but that can be said of a whole slew of other market choices.

I see the OPs signature line and I note that he uses premium syns for his two gasser applications, in reasonably normal OCI durations. That is overkill. Folks, it does not get THAT cold in his area where a 0w-40 HDEO (the product of interest to him) would be a necessity. Nearly everyone here is fulfilling my prophesey; they are jumping onto the newest offering, with no idea how to decide if it's a rational choice (or at least no outward evidence of such).

There is a HUGE difference between what can work, and what is "best". "Best" can only be proven with a lot of dedication and time and money; it takes a lot of resources and determination to accurately define what is "best" in any application.

Unless you choose to define "best" as what makes you sleep well at night, knowing that there are no measurables other than your REM sleep.






I have to agree with you, Newton. I have a 480 cu engine in my car. It may sit for 2 weeks at a time in -10 degree ambient temps. When I was using Mobil1 15-50 in it, it still started at -10. It was a little slow at that temp which is why I switched over to Rotella T6 a few years ago. Yes, it does turn over slower in the dead of winter but a 5-40 weight works just fine in extremely cold temps.

I think the "0" weight stuff is being developed just to "market" a new product that, as you say, would only benefit those in the most extreme cold weather climates. Like Alaska and Canada. As a matter of fact I know a journeyman mechanic that lives in Canada and he "still" uses 15-40 dino in all his cars and they are not all stored indoors. He's never had a mechanical failure with any of them due to the oil he uses.

The key is warm it up before you take off in it which is what I have done with every car I've ever owned. Even if it takes 15 or 20 minutes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom