New magnetic motor

Status
Not open for further replies.
Last edited:
view.gif


"What will you do when the chicken mcnuggets run out?" (in case that ad changes) Clearly a mainstream website!!!!
 
Yeah...I didn't go into the whole "New World Order is controlling energy" part of the article...sheesh...
 
What ever happened to the inventor of the motor that ran off "water/distilled" and Ford hired him/bought the rights....

He's been missing for years. Almost like we are living in Nazi Germany Circa 1940's


Nuttier than a squirrel turd I tell you
 
Last edited:
You guys are being silly.Of course Over Unity devices exist,thousands were given Patent Numbers by the US,British,Italian Patent Offices.The latest one being the Rossi engine.
And no,they don't violate the law of thermodynamics,they just tap the Zero Point Field.

The question should be "Why aren't we seeing more of those devices on the market"?Who is preventing their diffusion?
 
Zero point field. Absolute hokum.

Getting a patent, particularly years ago, has nothing to do with a device actually being viable.

As for Tesla, he went off his nut in his later years, simple as that.
 
Originally Posted By: HerrStig
Ya suppose the 1000 mpg fuel injection system is locked in the same vault with the 100 mpg carb?


There is always a grain of truth in these stories. Like Chevron buying rights to large scale NiMH batteries to torpedo cheap electric cars.
 
I recall reading an article some time back how the US Patent Office will no longer issue patents for perpetual motion machines unless a working prototype is presented to them. That certainly indicates they granted patents to such things before without them actually being built, much less working.
 
Originally Posted By: Garak
I recall reading an article some time back how the US Patent Office will no longer issue patents for perpetual motion machines unless a working prototype is presented to them. That certainly indicates they granted patents to such things before without them actually being built, much less working.


Your right....but Howard Johnson did it?
I believe it can and did happen, but then again, I think wasp spray (the foamie type) is a good self defense weapon...LOL

Howard Johnson Patents
[KEY] U.S. patent number 4,151,431 "Permanent magnet motor" (April 24, 1979)
U.S. patent number 4,877,983 "Magnetic force generating method and apparatus" (Oct. 31, 1989)
U.S. patent number 5,402,021 "Magnetic propulsion system" (March 28, 1995)
Related Patents
U.S. patent number 4,215,330 "Permanent magnet propulsion system" (July 29, 1980) Hartman; Emil T. [related]

Related Work:
Theoretical Self-sustaining Permanent Magnet Motor - anonymous inventor presents design with device sketches.

Inventions > Entirely New Kind Of Generator - Russian inventor, Vladimir Matveev, employs a concept called magnetic conductivity modulation; different from an invention by Howard Johnson. (Rense.com Jan 26, 2003) (source: UPI, Washington Times, Jan. 26, 2003)
FE Historic Reprint > The Symmetrical Permanent Magnet Motor by Tom Bearden
Discusses standard physics models for magnet interaction in a rotor-stator configuration. Proposes model in which "vacuum" energy contributes
 
I don't remember what year the Patent Office decided to stop issuing patents for perpetual motion. It would appear that it was at least later than 1995.
wink.gif


As for wasp spray, that foam may be a good self defence weapon. It certainly stops wasps dead in their tracks.

With patents, though, heck, we have enough products on the market that don't work as advertised and still get marketed, let alone have the resources to check if every patent is actually viable. We all know how Einstein worked for the Patent Office. I don't know of him having plagiarised any perpetual motion patents, though.
wink.gif
 
Originally Posted By: Kestas
I'm with Garak. A patent does not mean a product meets its marketing claims.


Yup! + 1 to that. US patent office grants "junky" unsubstantiated patents 1/2 of the time nowadays, with most of them being just useless (a conceptual thingy, off of the Bombay indian restaurant's paper napkin kinda deal).

Perpetual motion machine is definitely one of the categories where patents should never be granted unless a working model presented to a scientist or scientific board in a controlled manner. No working model, no deal (I bet ya a lot of backyard scientists will stop applying for patents from now on....*wink*)


Q.

If scientific development, mindset and discipline, backed by mathematics, have managed to propel human civilisation to where we are now, then you know that it's true. All other half-nots, and those w/o proper scientific and mathematic backings, etc. are all bunks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom