Originally Posted By: wtd
Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8
I can't see the Stang as even comparable to the Challenger.
The Stang is a 2 door sports car whereas the Challenger is a GT, way too big and heavy to even be competitive to the Stang.
The Challenger is heavy, very solid structure, and tons of hidden content. But it is unlikely to perform like the Mustang.
And the issues with the Stang are few and far between, the odds are in favor of the consumer here!
So are you saying the Mustang is a better deal? I assume from your user name that you are a Dodge fan and that you would choose the Challenger over the Mustang. I know performance wise the Mustang would be the winner but overall looking at build quality etc. what is a better car? Thanks.
Wayne
No offense to any Stang owners as their car is a ton of fun on wheels. Dynamically terrific and a bargain to boot.
But the Challenger is a great chassis, extremely stiff, allows for a better ride with fantastic handling. Much larger inside and out, with a real back seat. Better road noise and vibration isolation, less fatigue on the long haul. Very sophisticated suspension design, IRS, etc.
My car has been a unique experience for me, it's a 300 but it is nearly identical to a Challenger under the skin. My doors still shut like a bank vault after 8 years of flogging. It has aged surprisingly like a car with german heritage is typically thought to, except it has been virtually problem free.