Originally Posted By: bdcardinal
Originally Posted By: bdcardinal
The property tax at my house is something like $1400 a year, not going to complain at all.
FWIW Zillow estimates my house to be worth $928,275 currently.
I'm not so impressed. So a guy with a $1,000,000 bungalow in Santa Barbara pays diddly and the struggling young family in the central valley pays some multiple of that to make up for the windfall. What is the fairness of that?
To make matters worse as I understand it, prop 13 applies to commercial property. So it's possible to hold the commercial property in an LLC trade the LLC any number of times without revaluing the property.
On the other hand, California has a steeply progressive income tax, so a mid-income person pays a lot lower rate than the millionaire, lower overall income tax liability than some southern states.
PS California's budget is rock solid thanks to it's tightwad governor. Right now, California is running a budget surplus equal to Louisiana's entire tax revenues.
Originally Posted By: bdcardinal
The property tax at my house is something like $1400 a year, not going to complain at all.
FWIW Zillow estimates my house to be worth $928,275 currently.
I'm not so impressed. So a guy with a $1,000,000 bungalow in Santa Barbara pays diddly and the struggling young family in the central valley pays some multiple of that to make up for the windfall. What is the fairness of that?
To make matters worse as I understand it, prop 13 applies to commercial property. So it's possible to hold the commercial property in an LLC trade the LLC any number of times without revaluing the property.
On the other hand, California has a steeply progressive income tax, so a mid-income person pays a lot lower rate than the millionaire, lower overall income tax liability than some southern states.
PS California's budget is rock solid thanks to it's tightwad governor. Right now, California is running a budget surplus equal to Louisiana's entire tax revenues.
Last edited: