Originally Posted By: tig1
Originally Posted By: Shannow
Originally Posted By: tig1
Isn't that called a 30 wt?
No, why would it ?
Actually didn't you refer to M1 5-20 of the 1978 era as virtually a 5-30 wt oil? You have told us(me) that when I have mentioned that I used M1 5-20 in the 70's in engines calling for a 10-40 oil many times. A heavy 5-20.
No, selective memory there tig1.
I have said that
* M1 5W20 back in the day likely had a 2.9 HTHS, just like the Redline product.
* that this is the "same" HTHS as an ILSAC 30.
* That the 10W40s of the time were woeful, and when they were trying to work out why, they discovered temporary (and permanent shear), and when they gave the XW-40s in the 0W, 5W, and 10W ranges an HTHS minimum, they gave it 2.9, same as the 30 grades....they were THAT hopeless.
* and therefore, when Mobil said that the 5W20 offered the same protection as a 10W40, they were telling the truth.
* You can't take the original M1 5W20 oil, and the 10W40s of the day to mean the same thing TODAY, which you have a bent to do.
I have NEVER said that the original 5W20 was "really" a 5W30...nor Redline...THAT is the statement made by CATERHAM, that Redline is REALLY a 30.
And again, you can't compare the viscometrics of the original M15W20 with the 0W20s of today in terms of HTHS...which you keep trying to do so as well.