Originally Posted By: Thax
Originally Posted By: FutureDoc
I would prefer the Explorer over the Cherokee... but I am partial to the "Exploder" since it was my wife's old car. It was solid. Sorry, to many bad experiences with late 90s/early '00s Chrysler products. The engine/drive train might be fine in the Cherokees but everything else will be an issue. I would also consider a Nissan Frontier over the Toyota. While the Tacoma is better built overall, the Frontier is a bit cheaper, good off-road, and the base-model had a more off-road oriented rear suspension compared to the base Tacoma.
And just because you said mostly around-town with a little off-road...
When I was shopping around for a 4wd vehicle a while back, I ended up on the Subaru. No complaints and it is a bit more civilized on the roads and I have had zero problems on icy farm access roads (inlaws are farmers). It might not be the most "go get it stuck in the mud" readyvehicle, but there are a few folks who run modified and lifted versions for off-road only toys. Not quite an FJ but if you want a little off-road, 4wd, and mostly around town, hard to beat them
Late 90's and early 2000s Cherokees are just fine , ive literally have had almost zero problems with my 99. My fathers 2000 "Exploder" well thats another story. Currently has broken blend door , two door locks , power seat motor , rear wiper motor , factory radio , seat heater. Nothing wrong with that era XJ.
It's all anecdotal. I had the complete opposite experience. My first car was a 97 "Exploder" that I ran up to 100K with nothing but an O2 sensor and a broken trim piece on the rear door handle. Meanwhile, most of my high school buddies drove Cherokees and every single one had issues (mainly radios, power windows, and actuating the 4WD).