Originally Posted By: fdcg27
If I enjoyed good physical health, had enough funds to live simply and remained free of senile dementia, I can't see any real barrier to living to any given span.
After the first century or so, I would think that one's desire to acquire material things would fade. One might spend an entire century traveling, if he could afford to do so, but that would ultimately pass, after having gone everywhere there was to go and seen everything there was to see.
There would naturally be places one would return to, though.
After a few centuries, most of one's time would be spent in acquiring knowledge, of history, the arts and technical progress over the centuries.
If one could really hope to live for a millennium, he would be around long enough to see how the current unsustainable consumption of resources ends.
Does it end in chaos, in a post-consumption world society or merely continue with a cascade of materials recovered on other worlds?
We won't see an end to mass employment of some kind, since those at the top of the tree would always have to be wary of those on the ground chopping the tree down.
History shows that a large dispossessed class will bring revolution and none of the shinning palaces with their phalanxes of guards can protect the ruling elite when that happens.
It is for this reason that I don't fear for the future of our civilization. If things get too far out of balance, there are natural socio-politico forces that will come to bear to restore balance.
I think the word that a poster above wanted was "amoral", not immoral. The amorality of our current world culture began way up the food chain, not down here among us worker bees.
The natural sense of morality that most people have will eventually reassert itself among the masses and our current era of amorality will end.
Would be interesting to be around long enough to see how this all plays out.
I'm not so sure that we will run out of what you call "sustainable" resources. I would think that we will become advanced enough to be able to sustain ourselves in new ways that we can't even contemplate now.
Civilizations do rise and fall. I don't fear it either because I'll be dead. But if I lived as the OP proposed...I would fear the downfall. When those things occur (and it will...as I think it's begun already), they are almost always messy affairs with much hardship and death.
I don't know much about english and it's proper use. I try, but often come up short as you may have highlighted with the "immoral" and "amoral" points. I looked up the definitions so that I would not feel like a total fool. Here is a snippet from one of the sites that gives an explanation:
"So while immoral and amoral might share a little common ground, there is a clear distinction:
Immoral things are bad, and amoral things are either neutral from a moral perspective or simply removed from moral considerations."