My father was a Lancaster pilot and did a raid on Hamburg. Never spoke about any of it and gone now. Sometimes wish he'd tell me about it particularly after I joined the RAAF. Sure would like to know how he won a DFC.
Do you relly think Bush is not hated anywhere outside the USA? In Canada (which is not that different to the US) over 71% disapprove of Bush. It's strange how you say Clinton did nothing, yet he managed to end the crisis in the Balkans and keep the US economy booming for the longest time in history. You say he stood up to the UN, make it pretty hard to go back and beg them to save his sorry butt.quote:
First of all mnztr,the reason Bush is hated,if he truly is,which I think is a lot of leftist liberal propaganda,he is hated because he hasn't bowed down to France and the UN and stuck his head in the sand like Clinton did for 8 years.
Big dose of reality coming your way....guess what? Your country's disapproval of our president is irrelevant! Yes, you heard me! In fact, I think we should cut off all foriegn aid and military assistance to all these whining countries and give them something to really disaprove.quote:
Do you relly think Bush is not hated anywhere outside the USA? In Canada (which is not that different to the US) over 71% disapprove of Bush. It's strange how you say Clinton did nothing, yet he managed to end the crisis in the Balkans and keep the US economy booming for the longest time in history. You say he stood up to the UN, make it pretty hard to go back and beg them to save his sorry butt.
Panther. The Tiger (at least the Tiger I) just had a really big gun and really thick armor - there was nothing particularly innovative about it. The Panther on the other hand, was a magnificant machine - Heavy armor w/ a good slope on all sides, a small, heavy sloped turret, and a gun that provided huge punch at a modest calibre.quote:
Originally posted by mnztr:
The T 34 tank, was pretty much superior to ANYTHING the allies used during WW II and only the German Tiger was possibly better. Aircraft and arty were all domestic designs. But in later years the Russians did steal US technology including the A-bomb and the copied the B 29. But then most US rocket and missile technology was developed by Germans, and even the the current US light machine gun is derived from the German MG42.quote:
haha....ask the Russians where they got their technology and weapons! You ought to watch the History Channel a bit more often!
I find it very interesting that you detest the liberal views at your university. I am also an university student, except I agree with my professors, the only people who really understand the issue. As forquote:
Here's something liberals can't stand: Get a job, succeed, be happy. Good way to annoy a liberal.
Personally, I think the majority of ppl hate bush bc of all the events that took place in the last 4 years, which most of them(9/11 and the market crash thanks to greenspan) he had no control over.
As far as voting goes this novemember, I hope we have some intelligent voters going to the polls and not a bunch of sheep or stupid college kids that vote democratic bc their professors say to(Ive almost gotten into fights with my professors bc of how they try to convince the class into thinking liberals are the good of the ppl).
Ill give a good example of a democrat who is screwing our state up now: Jennifer Granholm. Id like nothing more than to slap that B*tch for what she has done to our state. She stopped our funding for college, raised tuition rates, insurance rates, passed the stupid .08 bac law for driving, and yada yada yada.
A lil offtopic. Most liberals have no problem with paying high gas prices, bc they say that other things cost more at the grocery store and such. What a bunch of idiots. If your gonna vote, vote smart. BUSH WIll get my vote this novemeber.
Yes, that's the common sense view (one that DOES NOT require a college education) but after studying sociology, you might learn about the great disparities in our society. It is hard to get a job when you are confined to ghettos where there are no jobs, and if you find one, the pay is often so little, it is very discouraging as it keep you in poverty no matter how hard you try. Find a better job you say? Ok, but how do these poor people find and afford transportation to get to work b/c very little jobs are available in these neighborhoods? How about affording child care? Ever heard of red lining and racial discrimination? Umm, have you ever heard of capital flight? Do you know what these things do to poor people? Go pick up a text book. As for bad politicians, yes there are bad Democrats, but don't forget the worse Republicans. Have you forgotten Water Gate? How about McCain as one of the "Keating Five"? And as forquote:
Here's something liberals can't stand: Get a job, succeed, be happy. Good way to annoy a liberal.
, sounds a lot like my governor, a republican. You've seen him on TV as Terminator. So Liberals are dumb when you have the Governator representing Republicans?quote:
Ill give a good example of a democrat who is screwing our state up now: Jennifer Granholm. Id like nothing more than to slap that B*tch for what she has done to our state. She stopped our funding for college, raised tuition rates, insurance rates, passed the stupid .08 bac law for driving, and yada yada yada.
Irrelevent? Maybe you've missed Bush begging the UN and other foreign countries to please save the US from the mighty Iraqi insurgents??quote:
Big dose of reality coming your way....guess what? Your country's disapproval of our president is irrelevant! Yes, you heard me! In fact, I think we should cut off all foriegn aid and military assistance to all these whining countries and give them something to really disaprove.
As far as the economy goes, smart people know it runs in cycles and Clinton was lucky to be in place for the up cycle and double lucky for the explosive dot com revolution that helped OVER drive the stock market to over valued highs. Also, it was all cycling down before he ever left office and the crash would have nailed any president that resided in office today.
As far as the UN goes, without the US, there is no UN. Don't believe me? See what happens if we ever told the UN to go "F" itself. See how the UN kisses our a$$ when we hold back the giant sum of operating money that makes it exist. Furthermore, when it comes to troops with the UN, we are the manpower. All you other countries supply enough manpower to barely beyond "a drop in a bucket."
How you like this batch of apples?
Your "smart people know" supports the notions that it does not make a difference who is president in terms of the economy. Then let's elect a monkey, no a parrot. How about a horse? After all, it's the economic cycle, right? Very smart comment.quote:
As far as the economy goes, smart people know it runs in cycles and Clinton was lucky to be in place for the up cycle and double lucky for the explosive dot com revolution that helped OVER drive the stock market to over valued highs. Also, it was all cycling down before he ever left office and the crash would have nailed any president that resided in office today.
It is important, because if our ally countries are beginning to disapprove, then we lose global influence and persuation. Our standing with the UN does not help either. Don't forget many Americans are also beginning to disapprove of Mr. Bush. As for foriegn aid, our current administration is aiming to make financial cuts within America, so don't expect them to be too generous outside of it. After all, politicans are trying to cut welfare and social services at home, making our own disadvantaged countrymen worse off.quote:
Your country's disapproval of our president is irrelevant! Yes, you heard me! In fact, I think we should cut off all foriegn aid and military assistance to all these whining countries and give them something to really disaprove.
Bush begging? Please...More like telling them how irrelevant they are unless they do the right thing. The USA can and will do the job with or without the UN and that is a fact jack!quote:
Originally posted by mnztr:
Irrelevent? Maybe you've missed Bush begging the UN and other foreign countries to please save the US from the mighty Iraqi insurgents??quote:
Big dose of reality coming your way....guess what? Your country's disapproval of our president is irrelevant! Yes, you heard me! In fact, I think we should cut off all foriegn aid and military assistance to all these whining countries and give them something to really disaprove.
As far as the economy goes, smart people know it runs in cycles and Clinton was lucky to be in place for the up cycle and double lucky for the explosive dot com revolution that helped OVER drive the stock market to over valued highs. Also, it was all cycling down before he ever left office and the crash would have nailed any president that resided in office today.
As far as the UN goes, without the US, there is no UN. Don't believe me? See what happens if we ever told the UN to go "F" itself. See how the UN kisses our a$$ when we hold back the giant sum of operating money that makes it exist. Furthermore, when it comes to troops with the UN, we are the manpower. All you other countries supply enough manpower to barely beyond "a drop in a bucket."
How you like this batch of apples?
I wish the US would stop military aid to EVERYONE, that is part of the problem. Also US aid is often tied to all sorts of conditions. BTW you probably didn't realize that Japan is now the largest doner of aid worldwide. Bet you didn't know that did you?
Right!!! Clinton was lucky for 8 years in a row, Bush was unlucky from day one. If that is true, lets get another lucky President 'cos this one is CURSED!!!
Firstly, Clinton got it to around 4.9%, and most people that understand how the jobless rate is calculated will know that it only represents 1 element of the employment picture, the total number of jobs in the US is still down dramatically from where it was in the Clinton years.quote:
Clinton wasn't lucky for eight years. His first term started in a down cycle (forgot that didn't ya?). But after a while it cycled up and then the dotcom revolution kicked off. Finally in his last year, it was going down. What you fail to admit is that our economy is on an upswing again and the jobless rate was at 5.6% by the Dept. of labor statistics and guess what, that is just as low as Clinton had it
Sure the US can do the job, but is it willing? So far the tab is 200 billion, it will probably reach 500 billion before there is any light at the end if the tunnel. 810 dead, probably 7 to 8K kia dead before the dust settles. What price are you willing to pay? BTW yes Bush is begging, they may be trying all kinds of rethoric, but the admin is desperate to get some sort of meaningful foreign help and keep the so called "cooalition of the willing" together.quote:
Bush begging? Please...More like telling them how irrelevant they are unless they do the right thing. The USA can and will do the job with or without the UN and that is a fact jack!
Cute story, but it's nothing like real American society. Nice try. You see, common sense answers can not explain society and social problems. These things are far more complex than they appear. If we all relied on "common sense" explanations, we'd still be dying from the bubonic plague. (I hope you can make the connection here. Back then, it was common sense that the cause MUST be something you can see with your eyes) In fact, I'd like to hear your explanation of the welfare problem. This is fun.quote:
A young woman was about to finish her first year of college.
Like so many others her age, she considered herself to be a very liberal
Democrat and had grown to be in strong favor for the distribution of all
wealth in America. She felt deeply ashamed that her father was a rather
staunch conservative which she expressed openly. One day she was
challenging her father on his beliefs and his opposition & more welfare
programs. In the middle of her heartfelt diatribe based upon the lectures
she had from her far left professors at her school, he stopped her and
asked her point blank, how she was doing in school.
She answered rather haughtily that she had a 4.0 GPA, and let him
know that it was tough to maintain. That she had to study all the time,
never had time to go out and party like other people she knew. She
didn't even have time for a boyfriend and didn't really have many college
friends because of spending all her time studying. That she was taking a
more difficult curriculum. Her father listened and then asked, "How is
your friend Mary." She replied, "Mary is barely getting by," she
continued, "all she has is barely a 2.0 GPA" adding, "and all she takes are
easy classes and she never studies." But to explain further she
continued emotionally, "But Mary is so very popular on campus, college
for her is a blast, she goes to all the parties all the time and very
often doesn't even show up for classes because she is too hung
over."
Her father then asked his daughter, "Why don't you go to the Dean's
office and ask him to deduct a 1.0 off your 4.0 GPA and give it to
your friend who only had a 2.0." He continued, "That way you will
both have a 3.0 GPA and certainly that would be a fair equal distribution
of GPA."
The daughter visibly shocked by the fathers suggestion angrily fired
back, "That wouldn't be fair! I worked really hard for mine, I did
without and Mary has done little or nothing, she played while I
worked real hard!" The father slowly smiled and said, "Welcome to
the Republican Party."
Oh gawd, another sociology student that knows it allquote:
Originally posted by kansaisubaru:
In fact, I'd like to hear your explanation of the welfare problem. This is fun.
How about planning for the future and not having children until you know that you can afford them?quote:
Originally posted by kansaisubaru:
How about affording child care?