Originally Posted By: grampi
I know I'm probably gonna get flogged for saying this, but I don't like the latest trend of engines getting smaller and smaller and then boosting them with a turbo to get them to make power. If GM could get 30 MPG and 350 HP out of the old pushrod design LS1 5.7L 20 years ago, there's no reason larger displacement engines couldn't be produced that are even more efficient today. Turbos are just something else that can (and will) break. Give me a good ol' large cubic inch, naturally aspirated engine any day...
With the US car market now being second to the Chinese, we will not see larger displacement engines in cars for anytime soon, if ever. The reason is that China, and many other countries tax vehicles based on engine displacement. It's cheaperfor automakers to reuse these small engine designs.
I know I'm probably gonna get flogged for saying this, but I don't like the latest trend of engines getting smaller and smaller and then boosting them with a turbo to get them to make power. If GM could get 30 MPG and 350 HP out of the old pushrod design LS1 5.7L 20 years ago, there's no reason larger displacement engines couldn't be produced that are even more efficient today. Turbos are just something else that can (and will) break. Give me a good ol' large cubic inch, naturally aspirated engine any day...
With the US car market now being second to the Chinese, we will not see larger displacement engines in cars for anytime soon, if ever. The reason is that China, and many other countries tax vehicles based on engine displacement. It's cheaperfor automakers to reuse these small engine designs.