Originally Posted By: tig1
Originally Posted By: labman
Originally Posted By: MBCLK
Originally Posted By: The Critic
In all fairness, there is some truth to what he said.
Well, the EZ Lube guy is telling me that since the conventional oil is "wax based" it isnt a good oil to use compared to synthetic. Is there truth in this statement?
A PAO is just as ''wax based'' as a conventional. Paraffin is a class of compounds without any functional groups. The name comes from the Greek for without affinity. Whatever other problems they have, they are inherently stable. Given oxygen and a source of ignition, they do burn. They are the main components of natural gas, LPG, gasoline, diesel, motor oils, wax, polyethylene, etc. They follow the formula H(CH2)nH. In methane n = 1, propane n=3, octane n = 8, and in polyetheylene n can be thousands. It is all the same stuff. The only base stock not wax based are the esters.
According to the M1 cold temp video that doesn't seem to be the case about wax.
The M1 video has nothing to do with the point I was making. While a PAO is still a paraffin, it does have a more branched structure than a conventional. That affects viscosity and viscosity index as does the additives as others already pointed out.
Every crude has a certain amount of paraffins in the range suitable for use as a PCMO, but very little PAO's or esters. The crudes available now don't have enough of the right paraffins to meet the demand for PCMO. Much of our basestocks now come from breaking down higher molecular weight compounds such as wax and converting them to lower paraffins or olefins to be reacted into base stock. So more wax could actually have been used to make M1 than Pennzoil YB.