Experiences with Magnaflow cat cons?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
10,916
Location
Birmingham, AL
My truck's front cats are cooked. I ordered a Magnaflow direct fit y pipe for it, $389 shipped after discounts from AAP. This was the highest quality direct fit option I saw (mandrel bends, stainless). Has anyone else used them? The order is placed, so I get what I get, just curious to hear others' experiences with Magnaflow cats if any. It looked a lot better than the Walker and Catco options (wrinkle bends, very non OE looking cats).

Also putting in new Motorcraft O2 sensors.
 
I have one on my frontier. Also purchased mine from AAP. Lined up perfectly. Its been on for about a year now. Seems to be holding up fine.
 
I hear they are nice. Unfortunately most of the applications are not legal in California so we cannot get them. They can't even ship them into the state.
 
They seem well constructed/welded. Magnaflows (and other aftermarkets) seem to have smaller cells than OEM units from what I've seen, probably to bump efficacy up to match the OEMs who as far as I know use different precious metal ratios and amounts.

When installed new just before an emission test, they need to get blasted with a series of hard WOT runs to "break in" to it's full efficiency.
 
I had a magnaflow cat professionally installed in San Marcos Ca, 8 years ago. But only about 35K miles added since then.

I had everything from the y pipe back replaced. Flowmaster 50 series. Was around 540$ IIRC. Not sure what the cat itself cost. Kind of remember the shop owner/ installer ranting about all the rules and regulations. I was fondling it fresh out of the box. I guess it could have been a different part in the Magnaflow box

Still pass smog tests. I could not notice any power increase when installed, but it sure sounded louder. The throttle did seem more responsive, but I couldn't notice any more power
 
I installed a stainless steel Maganflow y-pipe cat on my 95 F150 (just sold it Monday)

Excellent quality, only issue was the spacing of the pipes in relation to the manifold, I had to heat it to open it about an inch.

Have had their catback exhausts on a few cars (and have all been good quality and easy installs so it was a bit of a surprise.
 
i had a obd2 universal one on a previous car and it would last 6 months then fail. happened 3 times before I went to a catco. it never failed in the time I had it.
 
It might not even fit!

The Magnaflow cat for the Toyota 1MZ V6 engine doesn't actually fit the car. The diameter of the pipe is too small.

Go to post #16

and

an Amazon review of the Camry's Magnaflow

Walker was actually the best option for that car and may have even been the OE supplier (Walker does a lot of OEM cats).

Walker and Eastern seem to be the best brands.

So if the Magnaflow for your Ranger doesn't fit, you can always return it and get Walker. But who knows, maybe yours might actually fit. YMMV.
 
We installed one (Magnaflow Y-pipe w/cats) on our son's 2005 Tahoe.....appeared to be built well and fit perfectly. The only issue was the (I believe) code P0420 - cat efficiency. We replaced all four of the O2 sensors but in the end, adding modified spark plug anti-foulers to the rear sensors were the only things that would keep the light off and pass emission testing.
 
Not really sure, probably a few things. Performance has been gradually dropping for a while.

The truck has seen a lot of WOT in its life. Lots of towing and hills too. That probably didn't help. It has burned oil for much if its life too, not much (varies, on average probably a quart every 3K), but I am sure enough to add up over almost 150K miles. It had a cracked coil too, and I'm not sure how long it was like that.

Right now I can drive it with a very light foot, but giving it throttle doesn't do much, especially over 2800 RPM or so. It runs smooth, but it's like it can't move the air. Above 3500 RPM it starts to detonate and misfire at the same time.
 
Thanks paulo, looks like a quality part. I'm guessing no problems since?

As long as it fits good and flows good I'm fine. It can set a P0420 as long as it runs good (no e-test here). My truck is an LEV, so it met CA emissions when new, but it's not getting the CA cat.

'98-'00 had no cats on the y-pipe...I was thinking of deleting, but I'll give new cats a shot first.
 
Originally Posted By: 01rangerxl
Thanks paulo, looks like a quality part. I'm guessing no problems since?

As long as it fits good and flows good I'm fine. It can set a P0420 as long as it runs good (no e-test here). My truck is an LEV, so it met CA emissions when new, but it's not getting the CA cat.

'98-'00 had no cats on the y-pipe...I was thinking of deleting, but I'll give new cats a shot first.


IIRC, my 2012 emissions test showed the numbers creeping up. The cat is attached to an engine that has 436k miles on it so I'm pretty sure the cat is slowly being killed off by blow-by, etc.

I'll find out next year when emission test is due again.
 
I have them on my car and they are fine except that IF you have a "50 state" or C.A.R.B. spec car (like a lot of the northeast states had shipped to them by the manufacturers), they WILL throw a catcon code, even new, after a short time, due to the tighter calibration of those PCMs (Magnaflow did NOT offer a CARB certified catcon for my car at the time, for ANY price
frown.gif
).

IF you have a "49 state"/NON-CARB car (like I'm guessing your Ranger is), there is NO problem what so ever.
wink.gif
 
Well I guess I jinxed myself with this thread. The Magnaflow I got did not fit at all.

They changed the design of the resonator on the left side. It is now much larger than the factory one and does not fit. It appears that originally Magnaflow was making them with a correctly sized resonator/cat/whatever on that side, but then decided to put a larger one on. My guess is consolidating part numbers or something like that. Anyway, now they do not fit, at least not on a truck with an automatic transmission (shift cable clearance). Frame clearance was also an issue on that side. With a correctly sized resonator it would have gone right into place.

What it should look like:
41m3-Gr3O%2BL._SY300_.jpg


What I received:
mHSB2hAtGALh4FnVk8Ozxuw.jpg


Most pictures online show the correct size resonator.

I returned the Magnaflow and got a Walker for the meantime. On the Walker, they eliminated the resonator on that side and there's just pipe. I did send Magnaflow an email yesterday explaining the issue. It's very disappointing as there are no other stainless/mandrel bent replacements on the market.

The Walker has wrinkle bends, but at least it should fit...
41oFNh7JLAL._SY300_.jpg
 
Update...the Walker came Tuesday night and I put it in Wednesday night. The cats were definitely, beyond any doubt, the cause of the simultaneous detonation/misfiring. All of that is completely gone, the truck runs like new.

The Walker was a perfect bolt in fit with room to spare. No clearance issues at all. Wrinkle bends and spot welded heat shields look like [censored], but the truck runs really good. I'm happy.

Magnaflow did email me back and said there "may be a fitment issue on flex fuel vehicles." I replied confirming the truck was flex fuel, but haven't heard back. I don't think it's a flex fuel issue as much as it is an automatic transmission issue. A 3.0 is a 3.0 regardless of flex fuel capability or not. It's mounted in the truck the same and uses the same exhaust manifolds. I think though that all flex fuel trucks were automatics, and automatic 3.0s were by default flex fuel. I think the manual ones were not flex fuel capable. They probably test fit the cat I got on a manual truck(s) and it fit, but there is no possible way to get it into an automatic trans truck.

Either way, the Walker assembly took care of it.

For people with Fords from this era, it is completely possible to have a trashed cat and for the vehicle to NOT throw a catalyst efficiency code. My truck threw NO codes related to the cat, all it would do is flash the CEL. Wouldn't even spit out pending codes. The cats apparently were cleaning the exhaust that was getting through, they just weren't able to move the air through efficiently enough for the engine to run good at higher RPM. The OE cats didn't even look that bad on removal, but the truck runs far better now. It was an immediate difference...I hit the gas like I normally would to pull out on the road just after install and all it did was smoke the Wrangler Radials.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom