This story is bad, but it also raises a few questions:
80-year-old woman charged for neglect of 81-year-old Alzheimer's patient
The deceased woman had six children and thirty grandchildren. Uh, where were they? The 80-year-old could probably barely take care of herself, let alone someone in the kind of state the other woman was in. In my book the caregiver was no villain.
This is part of a pattern I've seen over the years, and it's become rather tiresome. Out of a large number of family members who could help, only one or two (or in this case none) will play the role of caretaker to an elderly parent or grandparent. My mother had to take care of her father in the 1970s, even though the man had seven other surviving children. None of them lifted a finger to help or contributed anything financially, but I'll tell you what: when he died, they came out of the woodwork wanting "their" share of the estate. (Granddad had a big surprise waiting for them in his will. He left everything to his wife, my grandmother.)
The other pattern I've seen too much of is to dump Mom or Grandma in a nursing home and then sue if anything happens to her there. If the parent or grandparent had really been worth the millions demanded in a typical abuse/neglect lawsuit against a nursing home to the family, they would have taken care of her themselves, I'd think.
I am preparing to leave work after 10 years in corrections, a job I like a lot, to take care of my mother and stepfather. Both have problems, and duty calls. He had five kids of his own, but they have nothing to do with him (long story, not his fault, his first wife poisoned the relationships) and I'm sure they won't help.
But it seems to me that we need to force people to help their sick, elderly parents in some fashion, at least financially, just as we cracked down on deadbeat parents. There would have to be common-sense exceptions, as in cases of parental abuse and neglect and so forth. But far too many people weasel out of helping when they could and by rights should help. Perhaps laws concerning wills and people who die intestate (without a will) should be revised to favor giving most or all of the estate to the caregiver and those who helped financially. This might be what it takes to get more to do the right thing. Then again . . .
80-year-old woman charged for neglect of 81-year-old Alzheimer's patient
The deceased woman had six children and thirty grandchildren. Uh, where were they? The 80-year-old could probably barely take care of herself, let alone someone in the kind of state the other woman was in. In my book the caregiver was no villain.
This is part of a pattern I've seen over the years, and it's become rather tiresome. Out of a large number of family members who could help, only one or two (or in this case none) will play the role of caretaker to an elderly parent or grandparent. My mother had to take care of her father in the 1970s, even though the man had seven other surviving children. None of them lifted a finger to help or contributed anything financially, but I'll tell you what: when he died, they came out of the woodwork wanting "their" share of the estate. (Granddad had a big surprise waiting for them in his will. He left everything to his wife, my grandmother.)
The other pattern I've seen too much of is to dump Mom or Grandma in a nursing home and then sue if anything happens to her there. If the parent or grandparent had really been worth the millions demanded in a typical abuse/neglect lawsuit against a nursing home to the family, they would have taken care of her themselves, I'd think.
I am preparing to leave work after 10 years in corrections, a job I like a lot, to take care of my mother and stepfather. Both have problems, and duty calls. He had five kids of his own, but they have nothing to do with him (long story, not his fault, his first wife poisoned the relationships) and I'm sure they won't help.
But it seems to me that we need to force people to help their sick, elderly parents in some fashion, at least financially, just as we cracked down on deadbeat parents. There would have to be common-sense exceptions, as in cases of parental abuse and neglect and so forth. But far too many people weasel out of helping when they could and by rights should help. Perhaps laws concerning wills and people who die intestate (without a will) should be revised to favor giving most or all of the estate to the caregiver and those who helped financially. This might be what it takes to get more to do the right thing. Then again . . .