Originally Posted By: 69GTX
The US has Calif/CAFE which drives a lot of the issue. I don't think much of the world is yet concerned about that last 0.1% of increased fuel mileage when they have much bigger issues to worry about.
The US also has a very wide temperature extreme from South Texas and Florida in summer to Montana/North Dakota/Alaska in the winter. Much easier for auto mfgs to spec one thinner size to fit all. I drove my 1997 Lincoln 4.6 to 232K miles on the 5w30 recommended oil. My 2002 has the identical engine but is spec'd for 5w-20 due to CAFE standards. I'm sticking with what worked before.
What I want to know is why all of a sudden we went from using temperature charts speccing from 5w-20 to 20-50 depending on ambient. Then, they say -40-+110, oh 5w-20 is fine. Did something change?
The US has Calif/CAFE which drives a lot of the issue. I don't think much of the world is yet concerned about that last 0.1% of increased fuel mileage when they have much bigger issues to worry about.
The US also has a very wide temperature extreme from South Texas and Florida in summer to Montana/North Dakota/Alaska in the winter. Much easier for auto mfgs to spec one thinner size to fit all. I drove my 1997 Lincoln 4.6 to 232K miles on the 5w30 recommended oil. My 2002 has the identical engine but is spec'd for 5w-20 due to CAFE standards. I'm sticking with what worked before.
What I want to know is why all of a sudden we went from using temperature charts speccing from 5w-20 to 20-50 depending on ambient. Then, they say -40-+110, oh 5w-20 is fine. Did something change?