Cylinder Wear VS Coolant Temperature-Graph

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Apr 19, 2004
Messages
189
Location
Northern Colorado
 -

I thought some would be interested to see this graph. I recreated the graph from an old engine textbook so it isn't perfect but it's very close. The only details I have about the test is that it was run for 60hrs and done by Continental Motors. The book is copyrighted 1986 so the test is at least 20 years old. Could be 40 who knows.

I ASSUME that the experiment was run using a small block V8 of the late 70's or early 80's vintage. So this info probably only loosly applies to todays iron V8s and not much at all to the small 4 cyl AL engines in todays small cars. I guessing the test was run at 3/4 to WOT throttle for 60hrs while the coolant was artifically kept at the desired temp. I think the test had to be run near full throttle because your average engine probably spends 60hr at less than 60F in its life and doesn't have 0.004in cylinder wear. But then again most engines are not run WOT at cold temps. The engine would have to be pulled down to measure cylinder wear compared to starting specs. Must have been an expensive test. I wonder if the wear measured was cylinder diameter or radius? I guessing diameter.

This data may or may not mean anything IMO but it's still interesting. It mostly tells me how hard it is on a engine to drive it hard while it's still cold. Also those of you running 160 T-stats in your motor (so you can run more timing) might want to rethink it.
Happy discussing and thanks to Razl for hosting the image for me.

[ December 17, 2004, 05:06 PM: Message edited by: OffOrWFO ]
 
Would they not have to run several engines for 60 hours each at the different temperture ranges or did they "best guess"?
 
The chart looked familiar, so I googled the title and found:


Meziere plagerized version

I have seen it someplace else with a description of the test work but can't find it now.

Considering TCMs product line of air cooled aircraft and air/oil cooled military ground vehicle engines and flathead gas engines for industrial equipment, it was probably run on something like this:
TCM Gas engine

The results should be valid for a wide variety of engines.

[ December 17, 2004, 05:46 PM: Message edited by: XS650 ]
 
Looks like I should have spent more time than I did looking for this graph on the net. Oh well its still kinda interesting. Here is a couple more plagerized vesions of the graph. A lot of the info in these links talk about running 160 T-stats and increased wear.
Link 1 Link 2

I still haven't found any info on the background of this graph. I would guess that it took 8-10 data points or engine tests/tear downs to create a graph of that shape. But then again who knows.
 
I've run across studies comparing oil between the rings and oil in the crankcase. Oil sampled between the rings appears to suffer more degradataion than oil collected from the crankcase, which is expected, and as expected the wear increases with load and temperature. The study suggested that oil samples from the crankcase weren't indicating the degradation as well, which I guess is to be expected.

My take is that synthetics make sense for that region alone, even if it's just a blend.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom