Commuting in a "bro truck" /rant

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here'a Superduty with 6 inches of lift and 37s. Hardly an impractical bro dozer.
1205or-16%2bmore-rise-out-of-our-truck-trail-master-six-inch-lift-kit%2b2011-ford-f250-super-duty-with-trail-master-six-inch-lift-kit.jpg


http://www.fourwheeler.com/how-to/1205or-trail-master-six-inch-ford-super-duty-lift-kit/
 
Last edited:
The majority of them actually can't afford the truck, let alone pay for the depreciation and maintenance to run them. They simply think by making the monthly payment that they are doing ok, when in reality they are broke and probably have a negative net worth.

Then they mod their trucks because it makes them feel like they're adding to the value of it. It's like renovating a house to these people. Don't get me wrong, I also know people who CAN afford their trucks/cars/boats and mod them as a hobby, but that's the exception rather than the norm.
 
Hatts right on that big of a truck 6 inch and 37s is reasonable. The trucks that stand out and bother me must have a lot more than that.
 
Originally Posted By: aquariuscsm
Bro trucks are just basically the white trash Cadillacs.


Redneck with a paycheck is what it's called here.

We have plenty of offerings for this crowd down here, but they surprisingly aren't that much of a nuisance. Usually slow, meandering driving is the worst thing they do. As far as actual nuisance driving, such as no signals, weaving, erratic phone-induced behavior, etc, the bro trucks around here are no worse than your typical Value & Convenience package midsize crossover car with Bootoof connectivity.

Amazingly, despite this state not giving one flying [censored] about vehicle emissions, a coal roller is not that common here. If you see someone rolling coal it's probably an '88 Caprice or C1500, and the smoke is blue.
 
Nick1994 its way cheaper to put 7500 miles on a 60k truck per year and have a 2nd car then to put 22500 miles a year on the expensive truck. This is true if you sell in 3 years 6 years 10 years or keep the truck forever. Depreciation fuel and tires more than pays for reasonable street car. Even a brand new mustang v6 would make sense over driving a luxury truck everywhere.
 
I'm driving 600 miles a week commuting now. You'd never know it to look at me or my camry. I have guilt over my resource consumption and am working on a carpool, for which my employer mostly reimburses. I'd like to leave some oil in the ground for my kids.

When gas goes back up, you'll see these guys "borrowing" their girlfriend's Yaris, and still waxing their trucks on the weekends.
 
Originally Posted By: dareo
Nick1994 its way cheaper to put 7500 miles on a 60k truck per year and have a 2nd car then to put 22500 miles a year on the expensive truck. This is true if you sell in 3 years 6 years 10 years or keep the truck forever. Depreciation fuel and tires more than pays for reasonable street car. Even a brand new mustang v6 would make sense over driving a luxury truck everywhere.
Show you math on this. The numbers don't work unless you buy a beater and hope it's trouble free. Using your example of 22500 miles/yr and assuming 10 mpg their total fuel bill is less $4500. A 30 mpg car is going to cost $1500 in fuel. Then insurance get you up to $2500+. A second car adds up. You need years for this to start paying off, and by then you need a new car so the cycle starts over. This is no different than all the people trading off their SUVs for huge losses back when gas was high to get something better on gas. The numbers didn't work there either. The $7K you lost buys a lot of gas.
 
Well, most truck drivers don't really use their trucks. So 80% are bro trucks to some extent but the jacked capital "B" Bro trucks are just the hyper manifestation of trucks as toys and for posers to look "practical". They are the old IROCs drivers sporting a t-top, decals, and an automatic. Empty shallow vehicles for empty shallow people. I don't really care until they start driving like an "askhat". If you are in a Bro truck, drive it right. The guy going 20 over, texting and weaving is going to be in a lifted, garage queen-bro truck around here.

It is hard to find a real work truck nowadays. I am used to farm trucks so anything other than a single cab, bench seat, and a long bed is a bit of a waste or luxury vehicle. Do they even make those vehicles anymore? We several trucks for climbing hills between fields (in the mountain valley), towing livestock, etc. If the engine eats itself, replace the engine and keep going if the body is not rusted out. Like dareo, I did the cost analysis with the truck for commuting purposes. A fiesta for a commute of 140 miles a day (3-4 days a week) for one of our common farm trips was cheaper than using a truck. Heck, even a Focus/Fusion would be cheaper (Fusion was out due to a lack of a hatch, but was the most comfortable for the trip).

Vehicles do not have to be practical... I know. I have something that does not have a trunk. I don't drive like an idiot in a 2100lbs on public roads which is the key for the Brotrucks. They are the idiots that put peoples lives at risk.

Now, those that do real offroading, backwoods activities, fine. But they normally are not "new" vehicles. Heck, my offroading buddies and I share AutoX and their trail event videos where we make fun of the $40K jeep rolling over along with the over-boosted MR2 (or any mustang) spinning out. Still, a Toyota with the 1.8 for commuting purposes was netting me 34mpg for a single-person trip... and then some AutoX on the weekends.
 
I do not know where you guys live. I live in the truck capital of the world and most of the trucks around here are pretty stock. I peeled the 4x4 stickers off of my F150. When the factory tires wore out I bought stock size but got an all terrain tread. I wonder if that make it a high modified bro truck using yous guys logic?
 
Originally Posted By: Miller88
I don't have a problem with removing emissions equipment to end up with a vehicle that (1) runs more reliably (2) gets better fuel economy (3) has less maintenance costs.

Rolling coal is stupid.


Agreed. That is what I am getting at. If you have a sports car and want to remove a cat because you see great gains of 10 to 20% in power and an increase in fuel economy, more power to you. But just to shoot out a huge puff of toxic air is stupid.

On the rx7's fromt he 80s, Removing a cat literally improves power by 10%. Trading the restrictive exhaust manifold for a header which deletes all 3 cats increases power by around 20% and in my experience increased fuel economy from around 20 mpg to about 27 mpg freeway. Feel free to do that all day long in my book. Using less gas sounds like it reduces some of the harm done by not letting a cat do its job.
 
Originally Posted By: eljefino
I'm driving 600 miles a week commuting now. You'd never know it to look at me or my camry. I have guilt over my resource consumption and am working on a carpool, for which my employer mostly reimburses. I'd like to leave some oil in the ground for my kids.


Me too, although I rather prefer driving alone. Once I get back into the 40's for mpg I'll be content to "go it alone". How I manage that one I'm not so sure about.

I much prefer my truck in relatively stock condition. Why would I want to listen to tire hum or exhaust drone on the highway?
 
Originally Posted By: mazdamonky
Agreed. That is what I am getting at. If you have a sports car and want to remove a cat because you see great gains of 10 to 20% in power and an increase in fuel economy, more power to you. But just to shoot out a huge puff of toxic air is stupid.

On the rx7's fromt he 80s, Removing a cat literally improves power by 10%. Trading the restrictive exhaust manifold for a header which deletes all 3 cats increases power by around 20% and in my experience increased fuel economy from around 20 mpg to about 27 mpg freeway. Feel free to do that all day long in my book. Using less gas sounds like it reduces some of the harm done by not letting a cat do its job.


It's a tradeoff. The cat reduces NOx and unburnt HC's, but as you point out, decreased CO2. I know older cars do well with removal of cats but I want to say after a certain point in time the cat became less of a problem--retuning the ECU to cut fuel increases mpg, but the cat is then along for the ride, not doing much (not kept warm enough) but not causing issues. Your case sounds like a good trade to me, but I'm not sure about more modern vehicles.

Now ripping emissions stuff off diesels has been a different game. It's like the 70's all over again. Different thread though.
 
Kind of OT, but I really miss those tiny pickups made by Toyota and Datsun in the past. Really simple, cool, fun to drive, and also practical for lots of work. You still see vehicles like that in other countries. Hint to the Bro Truck guys--if you have to act macho you're not.
 
Originally Posted By: hatt
Show you math on this. The numbers don't work unless you buy a beater and hope it's trouble free. Using your example of 22500 miles/yr and assuming 10 mpg their total fuel bill is less $4500. A 30 mpg car is going to cost $1500 in fuel. Then insurance get you up to $2500+. A second car adds up. You need years for this to start paying off, and by then you need a new car so the cycle starts over. This is no different than all the people trading off their SUVs for huge losses back when gas was high to get something better on gas. The numbers didn't work there either. The $7K you lost buys a lot of gas.


OK, lets use my family's main farm truck.
$51,000 Chevy HD 4WD 6.0 with a double cab LT with tax/tag
You get about 12mpg on average, normally a bit less. Not including towing trips.
Drives about 25,000 a year. So fuel at $3 per gallon @12mpg is $6,250 per year
Insurance is t least $1200 with high miles or low miles at or less than $800per year.

Lets say that with a small car, the vehicle only does 7,500 per year and the small car gets 18,500 per year. So at 7,500 the fuel price per year is $1875. Ok, this is the killer

Maintenance... well, that is more of a challenge. Lets say about $1000 a year for the first 5 years and then 2K+ after that. We just replaced the engine

Now, we hold onto our trucks nearly forever (or sell to family). We have a 2010 era, a 2000 era, a early 90s era and a 80s vintage. So depreciation? Ehhhh.
However, if you are putting a lot of miles on the truck the value is normally about 20% of the vehicles original worth (10 years old with 200K miles), but keeping it "low miles" is only 30% of the original value (75K miles in 10 years). So a "low mileage" truck will only net a $5K bump in depreciation.


Lets use a Focus because it is easy to pull 10yo value data (my family ended up with an Encore).
Focus
About 17K OTD. After 10 years of depreciation, it is worth about 15% of the MSRP at 175,000 miles (more if fuel prices spike).
Fuel economy is about 33mpg skewing towards the highway mileage. So fuel at 18,500 mile per year and $3 per gallon is $1681
Insurance is $700 per year.

So, the differences:
Fuel
Truck only $6,250
With Car: $3556
Gain: $2694 per year

Fuel is the key. You have to keep that as high of a benefit as possible as it offers the key. So...

17K - 15% recoup over 10 years is $1445
Recoup from a low mileage truck is $500 per year compared to the high mileage one which washes out the insurance difference.

Maintenance will skew in favor toward the car/truck combo or be a wash as the car will be less expensive to repair, especially if you go Diesel with the truck. Heck, My 2009 6.0 e450 cost me 13K+ a year in maintenance. Only one of my passenger vehicle fleet has cost more than $1000 in maintenance per year (averaged out), most are about $400-700 per year. We had to replace the transmission a few years in.

Tax will vary per local so you will need to run that cost for yourself.


The key will always be the gas cost over the long run. At $2 around here, the benefit is minimal if not a cost. However, at $4 is a a money saver but you have to run it out for the long term. This is not the same thing as folks trading in SUVs vs small cars (short term) as that is a replacement vehicle so the depreciation is added to that single transaction. Since dep. is not really apples to apples with this, it is kinda mute with that comparison.

The other thing is this. We are looking at 10 year intervals. If you do a lot of miles on a truck for commuting, then you are putting garbage miles/use on a tool (shortening its life). We keep trucks for 30 years. So, if you are doing 25K miles a year, re-buying in at 200K miles (every 8 years) vs keeping the truck with less miles for 15-20 years, then you will spend $50,000 + $12.5K (for those two years to make it to 10 years)... so you are buying that second vehicle anyway. The longer you can keep the truck going, the better as it is a tool... so don't use a high-end chainsaw to ground down a stump.
 
Quote:
The key will always be the gas cost over the long run. At $2 around here, the benefit is minimal if not a cost. However, at $4 is a a money saver but you have to run it out for the long term.

Don't forget other consumables, like tires for example. It is not uncommon to get 60-70k on a set of car tires that cost half of what the truck tires cost in the first place. Truck takes more oil too. But, bottom line has nothing to do with cost--it doesn't make any sense to commute in a Corolla if you need to haul tools and lumber, just as it doesn't make any sense to commute in a truck if you drive 50 miles each way 200 days a year hauling nothing but a briefcase. Personally, if I want to truly enjoy a drive I would take my motorcycle via the backroads, which makes no economic sense but is more fun!
 
I roll that into maintenance.

Actually, there was once someone we knew that had a hobby-farm with a Prius and a F-350 with either the 6.4 or 6.7. They only drove the truck when towing. That Prius was used for anything else. It was covered in straw, filled with concrete bags. It did more truck work than 90% of truck out there. Still, if you have a common need to use a truck, there is nothing wrong with a truck.

I loaded insulation back and forth in my older Subaru wagon from the home center. Folks forget how useful a wagon can be. Heck, I could likely move more insulation than a lot of shortbeds.
 
Gas and tires have never really been cheap enough here to see alot of guys commuting in a lifted truck.
I am a bit surprised these haven't been sued out of being insurable though? Totally screwing up a pickups CoG, braking, handing, and accident compatibility seems to be fine? I see lots with after market front independent suspensions and wonder if the design has be stamped by an engineer?
 
We've had these silly discussions in the past. In my opinion they reflect our country's general entitlement mentality that supersedes the long term welfare of our planet.

In 10 pages of posts, I only counted two, maybe three posters that suggested we tend to not be environmentally responsible. It ebbs and flows with the cost of fuel.

I don't drive a 40mpg vehicle and don't recycle as much as I should, among other things, so I am a part of the problem too. It's just our heritage and who we are.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom