Frank at ARX has already mentioned that a 3-ounce maintenance dose is ideal for keeping an already clean engine sparkling -- especially for owners of recently de-sludged motors looking to keep them that way.
My question is this: Rather than add three ounces of ARX when the oil is changed, why not move dosing closer to the end of an oil's life (say, within 1,000 miles of an oil change, for example)?
Doing so would seem to me to be a better approach. Relatively more "active" cleaning would take place since the ARX would be in use over a shorter duration, and the product's oil fortification benefit would be available when most needed, when the oil's add pack has started to deteriorate.
End-of-life dosing could also prevent ARX from competing with an oil's additives longer than necessary (although whether this actually occurs is currently unknown). Instead, pre-change dosing might act more like a "mini" clean-and-rinse cycle with every oil change -- which is the way the product is intended to be used.
What do you guys think? Your thoughts, Frank?
My question is this: Rather than add three ounces of ARX when the oil is changed, why not move dosing closer to the end of an oil's life (say, within 1,000 miles of an oil change, for example)?
Doing so would seem to me to be a better approach. Relatively more "active" cleaning would take place since the ARX would be in use over a shorter duration, and the product's oil fortification benefit would be available when most needed, when the oil's add pack has started to deteriorate.
End-of-life dosing could also prevent ARX from competing with an oil's additives longer than necessary (although whether this actually occurs is currently unknown). Instead, pre-change dosing might act more like a "mini" clean-and-rinse cycle with every oil change -- which is the way the product is intended to be used.
What do you guys think? Your thoughts, Frank?