68 Chevelle SS 396 vs 2017 Malbu 2.0 T

I have a 1991 magazine that is a compilation of road tests from the old Hi-Performance Cars magazine. The fastest 1/4 mile time was a 12.5 posted by Joe Oldham's 1969 Motion Performance big block Camaro- with 4.10 gears, uncapped headers and slicks. Aside from that car most of the others put up 1/4 mile ETs in the 13.5-14.5 second range. Those times are definitely on the slow side of average for performance cars these days. My 2007 Mazdaspeed 3 could run in the low 14 second range and trap 100 mph all day long- and that's with a 2.3 liter turbo that averaged 26+ mpg over the 8 years and 158,000 miles I had it. My M235i returned similar fuel economy but ran the 1/4 mile in 12.9 sec @ 109 mph. Even my wife's X1 can run the quarter in 14.6 sec @ 95 mph(a bit faster than my 1988 M6 when it was stock). That said, I love the musclecars from that era; if I had the money and garage space I'd have a Boss 302, an XR7-G, an AAR Cuda, a GSX, and a Ram Air IV Judge- but I still definitely believe that "the good old days" are NOW.
There's been a lotta technology developed in the last 50 years...
As you posted, a 12 or 13 second car back in the day had a pretty short gear ratio to get it moving... But was lousy on the freeway.
Heck, until 1967 most GM vehicles ran around on 2 speed automatics that needed rebuild at 60K. Today an F-150 has a 10 speed tranny!
Today's cars can do it all. And might even make it to 300K...
 
I noticed that the big-dog 1970 454 matched the 5.7 60-foot and beat the Malibu by 5 tenths in the quarter. I would rather have the Chevelle as a toy, but that's not too shabby for a car that doesn't stand out in the Enterprise rental lot.

Check out the specs for the Chevette! I'm surprised at how favorably the Citation's numbers compare, considering the one I drove once.
Oops. That should be 5.7 0-60.

It might take a Chevette to achieve 5.7 60-foot times.
 
As I mentioned earlier the 325 hp 396 wasn't a race car. In stock form a hot 327 or 340 Mopar would eat one alive.

They used to tune distributers on a distributor machine. Then add some hedders and it would be a completely different engine. Now you were ready to go out on Saturday night.

Add a cam,intake etc and that 396 would really run. Or just buy the L78.
 
The 325 hp 396 was not that fast. The L78 396 was rated @375 hp but was closer to 425. If you wanted a fast Chevelle you ordered the L78
For sure, two different cars. I think there was a Mopar around that time that was even faster than the chevelle IIRC.
 
Back
Top