2014 Chevy Equinox - initial impressions

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jan 24, 2008
Messages
639
Location
NJ
A little over a week ago I picked up a new company car. It's a 2014 Equinox LS. Base model, zero additional options. 4cyl, FWD. After about 110K miles on a 2010 Impala, I thought I would choose something with a little more cargo flexibility. I've put almost 1,100 miles on it in the 10 days I have had it.

So here are my impressions:

The 4 cyl is no rocket, but is more than adequate with the 6 speed auto. No issues merging with highway traffic. So far, it is averaging 25 MPG with fairly evenly split highway/local driving. It's a bit loud under hard acceleration, but steady cruising is pretty quiet. Acceptable for me.

The interior is very nice for a base model. Panels all fit together pretty well, no odd noises. The overall layout is nice, but the steering wheel blocks a good portion of the speedometer in any seating position I would choose. Not a huge problem as the little display between the tach and speedo can be set to show speed. Seats are comfortable and the material seems like it will wear well. I went with the straight black interior as I thought the two-tone was a little garish and would show dirt too prominently.

The interior feels very roomy and the driving position is nice. Spent about 5 hours driving yesterday and no fatigue to speak of.

Sound system is good. Display is very readable. The aux input and USB ports are inside the compartment in the center console and I think they are in a terrible spot. Very easy for the plugs to get damaged when you're reaching in for something.

Telescoping steering wheel was a nice surprise. There are lots of useful little cubbys and pockets for stuff. I always travel with tons of things and this really helps keep the interior free of clutter.

Typical GM penny pinching in some areas. No light in the glovebox. GM deleted the plastic floor cover behind the back seat and the roof rack side rails for 2014. I'm disappointed that a vehicle that lists for over 25 grand does not come with the rear cargo shade.

The switchblade key seems stupid to me. I just don't see the purpose. It functions fine, but I would rather have a separate key and remote.

My impala had the accessory outlets powered constantly. The Equinox switches the ones in the passenger compartment off with the ignition. This is irritating as I often leave my phone charging in the car when I am in a meeting. I wired some of my accessories to a battery circuit in the fuse box, but it irritates me that I had to. I had a 2004 Chrysler that let me move a fuse to switch between constant power and ignition. Not major, but irritating nonetheless.

A really neat feature is the ability to turn the child lock off and on using a button on the dash. I have a kindergartener so I like to have the locks on for the weekend, but I frequently take customers out to lunch and I usually forget to flip the switch on each back door. Now I can just press a button near the radio and they are set free.

The standard alloy wheels are good looking and it came with Michelin tires. I know the ones they sell the OEM's are not necessarily as good as the retail tires, but I am glad to see a premium name instead of the Hankooks that Ford so often uses. The Michelins run quiet and handle on rams as fast as I am willing to go with no howling.

I'm sure there's more, but that is all I can think of at this time. Keep in mind that I don't own this car or make payments on it so I may be a little more lenient on some things than if I were writing the check. Still, it like it a lot. I don't feel like I'm driving around in a cheap base model car. It offers great comfort and utility for a small family or someone who hauls a bunch of stuff around regularly.

If you're looking for a smaller CUV, it's worth a look. I'll let you guys know how she holds up over the long haul. I usually put around 35k miles on a year, so we'll find out soon enough.
 
We have 2 2012's in the family and they are both popular. Both are the base model with the up accessory package that adds some touches. One is in SC and one in upstate NY and I am on Long Island so I can't remember exactly what those were. I have ridden in them and in the back they are more roomy and comfortable than you would expect since they are smaller SUV's.
 
I actually quite like the Equinox (the place I work makes many parts for it, and it's made down the road from me) but I still dislike certain things about it. The base engine seems to not hold up well (timing chain issues anyway) and I feel a bit underpowered.

I feel if you got at least a 1LT or 2LT with a V6 you'd have a great vehicle. One thing it does exceptionally well is highway cruise at speed. The cabin is so quiet, it's great for a trip.
 
The 2.4L 4 cyl engine is not good. We have a 2010 with that engine, FWD. It is a pretty nice vehicle except for that engine. Major timing chain and fuel pump issues. GM even extended the warranty for those items to 10 yr/120k miles. I don't think they've updated the parts on the newer made engines or for ones they've repaired. We had a major repair for these in October (under warranty), and others on the equinox forum said they've had to have this same repair done multiple times. Not comforting.

OTOH, the V6 has been solid from what I hear. But for what these things cost now compared to when we bought ours for essentially the same vehicle, I'd go with a larger vehicle for close to the same price, or a cheaper direct competitor to the Nox.
 
At what kind of mileage are you seeing these failures? We have quite a few 2012 and 2013 equinoxes in our fleet and I haven't heard of any issues. We generally replace vehicles anywhere between 85k and 100k miles, depending on the timing of the bi-annual car order. I kept the Impala a bit longer because I didn't want to take delivery of a new car so close to winter and give up my remote starter.

Again, repairs are not my responsibility so I'm not worried. Just curious if we are getting rid of these cars before the problem arises or if it might have something to do with maintenance schedules.
 
Originally Posted By: pottymouth
At what kind of mileage are you seeing these failures?


I've heard of it happening as low as 25k miles on the odometer. And it having to be redone as quickly as 15k miles after being done the first time. Mine happened at 60k miles, but it was going bad for a while before that. The engine will become loud due to the timing chain wearing another part and thus stretching. What led me to take mine in was a complete failure of the fuel pump and they found all the other stuff in the process of repairing that.

Here is the letter from GM:


CONDITION
On some 2010-2011 model year Buick LaCrosse, Chevrolet Equinox, and GMC Terrain; and 2011 model year Buick Regal vehicles, equipped with a 2.4L engine (LAF), the chrome layer on the balance chain pins may wear, allowing the chain to stretch. This would cause an engine noise, and if left untreated, could cause the chain to break, leading to engine damage.

In addition, the fuel pump plunger shaft seal may wear and allow fuel to leak into the crankcase, setting a P0172 DTC, and illuminating the Malfunction Indicator Light. This can cause engine run-on and/or the engine to run rough.

SPECIAL COVERAGE ADJUSTMENT
This special coverage covers the condition described above for a period of 10 years or 120,000 miles (193,000 km), whichever occurs first, from the date the vehicle was originally placed in service, regardless of ownership.

Dealers are to replace the engine balance chain and the fuel pump. The repairs will be made at no charge to the customer.

For vehicles covered by Vehicle Service Contracts, all eligible claims with repair orders on or after July 16, 2013, are covered by this special coverage and must be submitted using the labor operation codes provided with this bulletin. Claims with repair orders prior to July 16, 2013, must be submitted to the Service Contract provider.


Rod
GM Customer Assistance Center
 
Thanks for the info. I did a little reading on the issue, and it sounds like the root cause is excessive fuel dilution due to long oil change intervals by following the OLM. We change our oil every 4-5k miles, so that seems to explain why our fleet has not experienced the problem.

Quite alarming that GM doesn't have a real fix at this point.
 
Originally Posted By: SLCraig
I actually quite like the Equinox (the place I work makes many parts for it, and it's made down the road from me) but I still dislike certain things about it. The base engine seems to not hold up well (timing chain issues anyway) and I feel a bit underpowered.

I feel if you got at least a 1LT or 2LT with a V6 you'd have a great vehicle. One thing it does exceptionally well is highway cruise at speed. The cabin is so quiet, it's great for a trip.


My good buddy has an '11 Nox w/4 cyl & 2WD. He loves it and is getting 26-28 MPG in mixed driving. Never had it on a full trip so, can't guess on the hiwy MPG though, he'd probable get over the EPA rating.

Not many folks mention how quiet the Nox is. This is the one feature that sticks in my mind "most" along with, how tightly the doors close. I am also very impressed with the solidity of his '11 Nox and the smooth/quiet of his 4 cyl. The smooth/quiet and tightness of the NOX put to shame my wifes RX-300(even when new)!
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: pottymouth
Thanks for the info. I did a little reading on the issue, and it sounds like the root cause is excessive fuel dilution due to long oil change intervals by following the OLM. We change our oil every 4-5k miles, so that seems to explain why our fleet has not experienced the problem.

Quite alarming that GM doesn't have a real fix at this point.


I think there is more to it than just long OCI. I think there are faulty parts involved. GM did come out with a change to the OLM. But I never let mine go below 30% (usually around 6k miles) and still had the problem. Now I have the new calibration for the OLM and it would get to 0% around 7000 miles if I guessed. I'm changing at 3000 miles from now on.
 
It is my understanding that chain was updated in 2012. I still change mine every 4000 miles. Easy peasy. I have a 2013 2LT. We like it just rolled 14000 miles and been pretty happy with it.
It is very quiet, more so than any similar CUV we drove.
So far no issues but still 14000 miles is nothing.

To me the 4cyl is slow...I guess adequate, but you have to remember I drive a supercharged Grand Prix daily and have a 11 second 1/4 mile Trans Am in the garage, so most stuff is underpowered to me.
smile.gif
laugh.gif
 
Originally Posted By: ls1mike
It is my understanding that chain was updated in 2012. I still change mine every 4000 miles. Easy peasy. I have a 2013 2LT. We like it just rolled 14000 miles and been pretty happy with it.
It is very quiet, more so than any similar CUV we drove.
So far no issues but still 14000 miles is nothing.

To me the 4cyl is slow...I guess adequate, but you have to remember I drive a supercharged Grand Prix daily and have a 11 second 1/4 mile Trans Am in the garage, so most stuff is underpowered to me.
smile.gif
laugh.gif



I'll need to find out if they used the updated parts in recent repairs.

I agree the 4 cyl is a bit slow. It is adequate, but I wish we'd have gone for the 6 cyl. But this was just when they came out, fuel mileage was a big consideration at the time, and supply was short (brand new model + cash for clunkers time = low supply). We might look at the Sport trim when we get a new Explorer sometime this summer (365 HP engine, sport steering and suspension). Depends on if we can find one not loaded up with extra features (we aren't paying $50k for a car). We'd want just the base Sport with the tow package. That is a little over $41k sticker. Otherwise the XLT with the features we'd want is a little over $38k sticker. The standard engine is 290 HP but is port injected, which I like (Sport's 365 HP one is direct injected). Dirty valves much more likely to cause problems than clean valves.
 
Originally Posted By: ls1mike
It is very quiet, more so than any similar CUV we drove.


We have one at work and it's probably one of the quietest vehicles I've driven. The Equinox is kind of the "Town Car" of small SUVs. It's fairly large, it's bank-vault quiet, and it rides very soft. Excellent qualities for many families.
 
How does it ride on the highway? My biggest complaint about my moms Rav4 is that its loud as can be and rides like [censored] on the highway. The wheel base is to short.

She will probably get a Ford Edge this year to replace it.
 
Last edited:
It has active sound cancellation built into the stereo sub-woofer to help neutralize road noise.

The tires make a bit of difference on this kind/size of vehicle, as well.

I don't know what the wheelbase is on your Rav4 but the Equinox is about 112 inches, I think.

I think it's always a good idea to read up on cars dot com, AOL autos, etc. Read the reviews and compare the specs. Edmunds is snother good web site for that. Probably Yahoo as well.
 
Originally Posted By: Hokiefyd
Originally Posted By: ls1mike
It is very quiet, more so than any similar CUV we drove.


We have one at work and it's probably one of the quietest vehicles I've driven. The Equinox is kind of the "Town Car" of small SUVs. It's fairly large, it's bank-vault quiet, and it rides very soft. Excellent qualities for many families.


I feel that the Equinox(NOX) is amongst the most grown up feeling of the under $30K CUV's
 
Yes, to me, the Equinox is the "Camry" of the small SUV class. They drive very refined, very soft, and very quiet. They don't have any "spunk" to me, but many families aren't looking for "spunk", so I think they're a good match for the market.
 
Originally Posted By: wallyuwl
Originally Posted By: pottymouth
Thanks for the info. I did a little reading on the issue, and it sounds like the root cause is excessive fuel dilution due to long oil change intervals by following the OLM. We change our oil every 4-5k miles, so that seems to explain why our fleet has not experienced the problem.

Quite alarming that GM doesn't have a real fix at this point.


I think there is more to it than just long OCI. I think there are faulty parts involved. GM did come out with a change to the OLM. But I never let mine go below 30% (usually around 6k miles) and still had the problem. Now I have the new calibration for the OLM and it would get to 0% around 7000 miles if I guessed. I'm changing at 3000 miles from now on.

Erk. My Regal is a 2011 with this engine, ~44K miles. I'll make sure to change the oil at about 4K, and keep an ear out for strange noises. Or does the bulletin mean that I can ask the Buick dealer to install the updated parts?
 
Originally Posted By: Hokiefyd
Yes, to me, the Equinox is the "Camry" of the small SUV class. They drive very refined, very soft, and very quiet. They don't have any "spunk" to me, but many families aren't looking for "spunk", so I think they're a good match for the market.


Yea, my buddy(69 yrs old) after all these years, was looking for a mini-ute(after driving land bardges for years). His first intent was to go for the CR-V(knowing my passion for Honda's) but, I pushed him into staying with GM as the change would have been too shocking for him in terms of quiet and plushness. It would have seemed too crude for him and he wouldn't understand peoples fondness of the brand.

Sure he'd love the CR-V's reliability and a vehicle that does everything well but, would have question his own decision on price and the features he didn't get in a Honda vehicle compared to a GM.

He loves his NOX and it does most thing well for the way he drives and what he has come to love in American Iron. I don't think that Honda could have provided this for him after all of these years.

I like Honda's more direct approach to driving which is why I drove'em for so long. I only moved away from Honda as I didn't want to miss out on other manufactures offering these days. It's actually harder for me to choose now as all vehicles are quite nice! Where at onetime, I bought Honda's becauese I didn't like the offerings that were available in other brands in terms of driving dynamics, quality/reliability & style.
 
There is distinct difference in driving feel between our '08 CR-V and the '11 Equinox we have at work. The Equinox is plush and quiet, which works for many families, but there are compromises that come along with that. I don't prefer the muted feel.

You are right: the Honda would never have provided the "big iron" feel. They just don't drive like that. Some like it, and some don't. We're blessed to have the choice of so many quality vehicles; there is something for everybody out there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom