I so wish they'd make a 2-door version of the 265 hp - v6 sport Fusion !!!
mechanicx said:I think that works both ways. Motor Trend tends to be fairer to domestics while not critical of imports, whereas Car and Driver seemed to be biased in favor of Imports. I'm talking ridiculously biased almost to the level of propaganda. Who was more likely to be paying off or to own stock in the company that could be worth something and grow in value? I'd say the upstart Imports were more likely paying off.
Originally Posted By: benjamming
What way are you talking about? Your post makes no sense when quoted with mine. I think that about MT every year they release their trophy car. I thought that when the Mercedes M Class won it as well. I was even working in a Tier 1 supplier assembly plant on that car then!
Originally Posted By: mechanicx
I couldn't have been clearer and it makes perfect sense to me. You were suggested that MT's award is bogus because of kickbacks, and I said nothing smelled more bogus and like kickbacks then how Car and Driver praised every foreign car it tested while bashing domestics ridiculously.
Originally Posted By: benjamming
You were saying that MT is more fair to domestics while not being critical of imports. You then started talking about C&D. I never brought up domestics nor imports. Anyway...
Originally Posted By: mechanicx
What is so hard to understand lol? You criticised Motor Trend, a automotive magazine, as being biased or getting kickbacks (the highest kickback from Ford presumably) and the Ford Fusion, a domestic, as not being worthy of the award, so naturally I'm going to contrast what you said about MT and Ford to other car magazines and Imports.
Quote:
That isn't what I was saying at all. I was saying MT gets kickbacks from everyone every year. I never mentioned biased. That is why I said your post had nothing in common with mine - you added the term biased.
LOL what is the difference? If someone is getting a kickback, then that biases their decision. Besides I think kickback accusations are worse than bias accusations, it's elaborating more on why there is a bias. MT is not the most or only biased (my word) magazine was my point.
Quote:
MT gives this award to a different mfg about every year. It goes to the highest bidder of that year. So, true I believe that Ford gave the highest kickback this year but new bids will be issued next year.
Do you have any proof of this accusation? Of course MT gives the award to a different make/model every year. They require the car to be a remake. You are accusing Ford and MT of being crooked, so that's why I brought up Car and Criver and their love affair with imports.
Quote:
BTW, the Fusion is not a domestic. It is made in Mexico, a foreign country for the time being.
This is your definition of not being a domestic. By most others' definition if the company is domestically owned and has a certain level of domestic content, then it is considered a domestic.
Quote:
I also specifically added the clarification that my comments were in no way a reflection upon the Fusion, but solely MT. So, I said nothing about Ford.
No, you said Ford gave kickbacks to MT in order get the Fusion to win. How are you not saying the Fusion isn't worthy on it's on accord and saying something bad about Ford for engaging in offering kickbacks? I think you are arguing both ends against the middle but whatever.