Originally Posted By: danthaman1980
I personally feel that river_rat did a good job testing filtration, and there was another very good filtration test on another forum by someone named Aloicious - but nobody has definitively answered the flow equation (river_rat had some qualitative flow data, but not much quantitative flow data).
A decade ago, Bob (of Bobistheoilguy) had a really nice bench testing setup for measuring pressure drop through an oil filter, but to my knowledge it was only run with cold motor oil... never hot oil or with a fluid that emulates the viscosity of hot oil, so I'm not sure that work ever yielded any valuable results.
Here's real bench data with hot oil. As you can see the delta-P (PSID) across the media isn't very much with hot oil.
http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubb...451#Post1619451
Originally Posted By: danthaman1980
Many here will argue that the restrictiveness, or pressure drop, is meaningless since most cars are equipped with positive displacement oil pumps - so a more restrictive filter will result in higher pressure on the input side but result in the same pressure on the output side (versus a less restrictive filter). In theory that is true; but 1) it does result in the oil pump having to do more 'work' to achieve the same oil flow, and 2) it doesn't explain why my truck doesn't like PureOne filters.
I'm still looking for answers.
In my previous post up from this one a ways, I also stated other slight advantages you would get with a "better flowing oil filter". As said, unless you are cruising around at near red line all day long (or revving high with a cold start thereby putting the filter in bypass or the pump in pressure relief), your engine will never know the difference between oil filters with slightly different flow restrictiveness (talking flow vs PSID characteristics).