Originally Posted By: Hitzy
Originally Posted By: andrewg
Originally Posted By: Hitzy
Originally Posted By: andrewg
But 15w-xx or 30 weights would be taking a risk of premature wear based on what the designers advise.
But alas....all my opinion really.
Why would a 15w40 in Florida cause premature wear over the recomended 0w40? Both are 40 weight at operating temp?
Why would a 0w be required in Florida?
Not all wear occurs at operating temperatures. One big advantage of of a 0w-xx is it's ability to flow quickly at startup....even in Florida. I'm sure the manufacturers have that in mind or they simply wouldn't have recomended it. If startup flow didn't matter then why even use a multi weight at all in the southern U.S.? Common sense.
A 0w40 oil here in -20C Canadian winter will be thicker then a 15w40 oil in +30C Florida at start up. That's my problem with the "one oil fits everyone" theory, it doesn't make sense. Ambient temp plays a part even in liquid cooled engines, and can negate the ultra low winter rating of a 0wxx, or increase/lower the operating temp viscosity requirement.
Yes, it would be thicker. But I'm sure the Polaris engineers took all available data of the intended geographic use of it's ATV, and gave it a best 'all-around' oil viscosity recomendation. Otherwise you'd have fools from schmuck-ville putting who knows what into the filler hole. A baseline needed to be derived at....for longevity and warranty purposes. But if you want to talk about operating the ATV in extremes of temps and climate....yes, I'm sure it would be a good idea to adapt to a different viscosity. But I still would not say that Florida is extreme. Perhaps Arizona in July/August? You bet.
Originally Posted By: andrewg
Originally Posted By: Hitzy
Originally Posted By: andrewg
But 15w-xx or 30 weights would be taking a risk of premature wear based on what the designers advise.
But alas....all my opinion really.
Why would a 15w40 in Florida cause premature wear over the recomended 0w40? Both are 40 weight at operating temp?
Why would a 0w be required in Florida?
Not all wear occurs at operating temperatures. One big advantage of of a 0w-xx is it's ability to flow quickly at startup....even in Florida. I'm sure the manufacturers have that in mind or they simply wouldn't have recomended it. If startup flow didn't matter then why even use a multi weight at all in the southern U.S.? Common sense.
A 0w40 oil here in -20C Canadian winter will be thicker then a 15w40 oil in +30C Florida at start up. That's my problem with the "one oil fits everyone" theory, it doesn't make sense. Ambient temp plays a part even in liquid cooled engines, and can negate the ultra low winter rating of a 0wxx, or increase/lower the operating temp viscosity requirement.
Yes, it would be thicker. But I'm sure the Polaris engineers took all available data of the intended geographic use of it's ATV, and gave it a best 'all-around' oil viscosity recomendation. Otherwise you'd have fools from schmuck-ville putting who knows what into the filler hole. A baseline needed to be derived at....for longevity and warranty purposes. But if you want to talk about operating the ATV in extremes of temps and climate....yes, I'm sure it would be a good idea to adapt to a different viscosity. But I still would not say that Florida is extreme. Perhaps Arizona in July/August? You bet.
Last edited: