06 Mustang GT Convertable how much for a blower

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jul 14, 2014
Messages
68
Location
Northern Illinois
Hello Happy Thanksgiving . I was throwing around getting a blower on the Mustang ,what the cost would be ,if the motor would hold up to light street use ,just want to rip them up every now and then ,70,000 miles runs good ,got a great deal 6200 bucks ,was a theft recovery
 
"Just every now and then" lol

It's still not going to be as fast as you like. You're far more likely to introduce all sorts of little issues to chase. I only know of two bolt-on superchargers (not my own) both on trucks, but they both have sensor-related gremlins that require consistent attention. Do whatever makes you happy.
 
Originally Posted By: holdorf333


It's still not going to be as fast as you like. You're far more likely to introduce all sorts of little issues to chase. I only know of two bolt-on superchargers (not my own) both on trucks, but they both have sensor-related gremlins that require consistent attention. Do whatever makes you happy.


I disagree. It is a very common modification to this generation Mustang. A good kit has all the gremlins worked out. And with enough intercooled boost, about 12 pounds or so, you've nearly doubled your RWHP.

Furthermore, the 4.6L engine is very tough. It's capable of reliably doubling it's HP without any internal modifications and no significant decrease in reliability or lifespan. I know of a few locals with well North of 250K miles on their older Mustangs, still running strong! Still on the original engine.

There are a large group of Mustang owners around here who regularly run solidly in 11 second quarter mile range on daily-driver, supercharged but otherwise stock 4.6L engines. Quite simply, that is "fast enough" to be a whole lot-o-fun!

Good kits range from the mid $3K to $6K level. Depending on type of blower. The centrifugal blowers are cheaper, produce excellent high RPM boost and easier to install. The positive displacement blowers produce boost from idle on up, and are ultra responsive at any RPM. But they are a heavier parasitic load at low RPM, and therefore some drivers don't like the "feel" of the engine under low loads. Much like having the AC on all the time on an underpowered car.

Both types will work well with either transmission. However, the Mustang and Corvette guys around here, tend to use centrifugal blowers with automatic transmissions.

s197_black_system.jpg


The Roush positive displacement system is reasonably priced, perfectly tuned,
20120313082043_8914.jpg
and makes major HP. 475HP as installed.
 
Last edited:
A complete Mustang kit would be nice or how about just nitrous oxide.

http://www.cjponyparts.com/catalog/categ...CFcuOfgodHPECng

The only way to go is a complete, well engineered kit. Consider having it installed by a professional shop that does this kind of work. A few dollars more invested like this might make for a better deal.

The nitrous oxide only kit might be all you really need for a bit of fun now and then.
 
Nice car but Id probably skip the investment on such a high mileage car unless youre really in it for the long run.
 
Originally Posted By: Mr Nice
I would just do bolt ons and skip the supercharger.

Superchargers bolt on, last time I checked... But you do raise a good point. A supercharged engine will benefit from a higher-flow exhaust system, and I would consider it a must-have with ANY power adder. You may also want to look into cams, but that's about as far as I think you need to go.

Originally Posted By: JHZR2
Nice car but Id probably skip the investment on such a high mileage car unless youre really in it for the long run.

Is 70k high mileage?


OP, boost away. My advice is to find a local and experienced tuner with a portfolio of well-runnimg fast Mustangs, and ask HIM which kit you should use. He'll know what is reliable and what isn't, and he'll know what kits install without issue. You'll also come away with a better running car if your tuner is familiar with your car AND chosen power adder.
 
Originally Posted By: JHZR2
Nice car but Id probably skip the investment on such a high mileage car unless youre really in it for the long run.



I'd agree about passing on dumping money into a theft recovery. You got it plenty cheap. Just drive the wheels off it as it has plenty of HP as is. It will be easier to sell down the road if you decide to go the non-modified route. And 2/3 or more of your "investment" in after-market add-ons will go up in smoke.

These days, older muscle cars 10-20 yrs old are considered "high mileage" after they pass the 50K-70K range. It seems to me the majority of buyers are looking for 10K-40K miles.
 
Originally Posted By: Bumble_guy
Thanks for posting ,clears some thing up ,it is a automatic ,it currently gets 24 miles per gallon ,what will a supercharger do to fuel mileage


Both types will lower MPG due to parasitic drag. With a good tune, the typical loss is about 3MPG in real world similar driving. Not horrible at all. However, as with many things, HP takes fuel, so when you "get on it" expect MPG to be lower.

And, I promise, 70K miles is in fact, very low miles for a modular Ford engine. The modular engines being among the longest lasting gasoline engines around. It's not uncommon to see modular engines with 400K-500K miles in truck use. And far more in taxi/limo use.

"IF" it were me, I'd pick the Roush setup for the instantly available, and very significant, low end torque increase. It's a very well refined setup, and was common at dealerships when this car was new. The Roush setup will make more power from idle on up. The centrifugal will make more power only in the higher RPM range. I like both types, and as I mentioned many people with automatic's tend to choose the centrifugal blower. The reason is simple, they move the automatic's shift points up, to remain at high RPM and therefore, in boost. Works extremely well at the strip. A bit less ideal in street driving, having to use high rpm to get power.

Here is a base model Roush setup: http://www.roushperformance.com/parts/Mustang-Supercharger-2005-2006.html

You might like this video, watch to the end! : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZmWBFADa4M
 
Last edited:
+1 on doing some exhaust work and cams, 5 psi isn't going to stress the internals too much, its a relatively low HP/pressure setup so it will be very streetable and durable. Get up to 19-21 psi and things are looking a lot different.
+1 on 70K being low mileage for this engine. Like I said $5-6K
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom