^That and there is no quantifiable data tracking the frequency of top up oil/change in ppm in typical UOA results seen on these boards; though anyone can be my guest to waste their entire life trying to get that together. (please dont)
Another thing to consider is, a UOA is a relative 'snap shot' of engine health to begin with. As long as lubricant properties appear fine, there is 'nothing' to definitively suggest an oil change of 40,000 miles or 4,000 miles will in of itself increase wear. Usually, it's a host of other 'factors' that dictate.
Of course the OP would not perform this OCI without the by-pass system for one.
You have to prove contributing factors in a specific application for reasons (such as service seen or FAILED parts not directly related to performing an extended OCI) that condemn the practice of extended OCIs as being 'unverified' via UOA; even if one has a by-pass set up or not. One course argue in some event the may be an oil flow issue by letting the bypass system go too long between filter changes and providing a source not stock of restriction to the system.
I suppose this: That this engine torn down will probably be no better off or worse for 'wear' as one that sees typical service(not referring to catastrophic failed engines of course).