Recent Topics
2013 Civic Si - K-Series - Honda MTF - 15,227 mile
by SavageWS6
07/28/15 04:33 PM
An American Dentist Killed Zimbabwe’s Famous Lion
by HTSS_TR
07/28/15 03:52 PM
Crazy low NOAC?
by Jake777
07/28/15 03:31 PM
Crazed LEO in Dashcam in Boston Suburb
by spavel6
07/28/15 03:08 PM
oil filter and vehicle warranty
by anylettuce
07/28/15 02:58 PM
Hyster Powershift transmission oil - Equivalent
by Bud_One
07/28/15 01:28 PM
Do mechanics only replace the whole distributor?
by PandaBear
07/28/15 01:20 PM
Ford factory fill..any additives from factory?
by Travis99LS1
07/28/15 01:17 PM
Ram 5.7 hemi actual oil capacity
by Rojack
07/28/15 11:14 AM
Late model Grand Caravan spare tire..
by JTK
07/28/15 10:57 AM
The latest insanity: A/C is sexist
by Benzadmiral
07/28/15 10:50 AM
2016 Colorado/Canyon diesel news release.
by A_Harman
07/28/15 10:20 AM
Newest Members
keg, danytremblay, SYZAC, NelsonT, richiero
54858 Registered Users
Who's Online
89 registered (ag_ghost, Al, 90crvtec, 97prizm, 901Memphis, afree, 14 invisible), 1841 Guests and 89 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
54858 Members
66 Forums
235003 Topics
3779994 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 >
Topic Options
#2304130 - 07/02/11 12:11 PM RWD v. FWD for snow use
RamFan Offline


Registered: 05/09/10
Posts: 1695
Loc: Illinois, U.S.A
Not an article, more like a Q&A.
_________________________
06 Monte Carlo LT
+3.9l V6 - 164k - Super S Multi-Flo 5w30 - Fram Ultra - OLM
04 Ram 1500 SLT
+5.7l V8 - 167k - QSUD 5w30 - Quaker State - 5k/6mo

Top
#2304138 - 07/02/11 12:21 PM Re: RWD v. FWD for snow use [Re: RamFan]
dparm Offline


Registered: 04/19/10
Posts: 12612
Loc: Chicago, IL
With today's modern tires (and snow tires), stability control, torque vectoring, etc...I find there's almost no real difference.
_________________________
2011.5 BMW M3 saloon ZCP
der stärkste buchstabe der welt
Castrol Edge Professional TWS 10w60 + Mahle OX 254D3

Top
#2304140 - 07/02/11 12:23 PM Re: RWD v. FWD for snow use [Re: dparm]
JHZR2 Offline



Registered: 12/14/02
Posts: 35904
Loc: New Jersey
Originally Posted By: dparm
With today's modern tires (and snow tires), stability control, torque vectoring, etc...I find there's almost no real difference.


But the physics of the situation (real ones, not computer actuated stuff) still favors the FWD vehicle, IMO.

Top
#2304145 - 07/02/11 12:28 PM Re: RWD v. FWD for snow use [Re: JHZR2]
simple_gifts Offline


Registered: 07/26/04
Posts: 9944
Loc: Middlesex County CT
Originally Posted By: JHZR2
Originally Posted By: dparm
With today's modern tires (and snow tires), stability control, torque vectoring, etc...I find there's almost no real difference.


But the physics of the situation (real ones, not computer actuated stuff) still favors the FWD vehicle, IMO.


+1

RWD=no control over direction of traction. That is a "big" reality no one can convince me is not important.
_________________________
2003 Echo >368K miles; ST 10W-40HM and some #132
2006 B2300;94K;ALM

Note to park visitors: Yellowstone wildlife is wild

Top
#2304152 - 07/02/11 12:34 PM Re: RWD v. FWD for snow use [Re: RamFan]
Hollow Offline


Registered: 02/29/08
Posts: 1134
Loc: the South
With 4 snow tires (not 2 on the drive wheels!) and some attention to the road I still prefer RWD myself. Learned to drive RWD, first 4 vehicles were RWD, not drive an AWD. Just do not like how a FWD car handles.

Top
#2304165 - 07/02/11 12:52 PM Re: RWD v. FWD for snow use [Re: JHZR2]
dparm Offline


Registered: 04/19/10
Posts: 12612
Loc: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted By: JHZR2
Originally Posted By: dparm
With today's modern tires (and snow tires), stability control, torque vectoring, etc...I find there's almost no real difference.


But the physics of the situation (real ones, not computer actuated stuff) still favors the FWD vehicle, IMO.


Agreed but I've driven FWD, RWD, and AWD cars in the snow (all 3 with the same motor, actually) and with all of today's advancements it pretty much felt the same. AWD was easier to get moving but in terms of car control...very close.
_________________________
2011.5 BMW M3 saloon ZCP
der stärkste buchstabe der welt
Castrol Edge Professional TWS 10w60 + Mahle OX 254D3

Top
#2304176 - 07/02/11 01:26 PM Re: RWD v. FWD for snow use [Re: simple_gifts]
fdcg27 Online   content


Registered: 09/25/09
Posts: 10914
Loc: OH
Originally Posted By: simple_gifts
Originally Posted By: JHZR2
Originally Posted By: dparm
With today's modern tires (and snow tires), stability control, torque vectoring, etc...I find there's almost no real difference.


But the physics of the situation (real ones, not computer actuated stuff) still favors the FWD vehicle, IMO.


+1

RWD=no control over direction of traction. That is a "big" reality no one can convince me is not important.



Actually, RWD offers the option of steering with both the steering wheel and your right foot, while a FWD car will simply plow itself toward the outside of a corner.
FWD is probably more idiot-proof, but RWD offers options to anyone who's driven RWD enough to be comfortable with it.
Neither is in the same class as AWD, though.
_________________________
12 Accord LX 36K PP 0W-20
09 Forester 67K PU 5W-30
02 Accord 144K GOil 5W-30
01 Focus ZX3 101K Meijer Syn 5W-20
95 BMW 318iC 150K Defy 10W-40

Top
#2304179 - 07/02/11 01:28 PM Re: RWD v. FWD for snow use [Re: RamFan]
Spazdog Offline


Registered: 09/06/10
Posts: 5941
Loc: Arlington
It seems to me that it is dependant on the car.

I got passed by a 5-series in the ice this past winter when I felt like I was at the safest speed my fwd Mazda6 could travel.(the 5-er was backwards against the wall a couple miles down the road but I did not see what made that happen. Driver error? Someone else caused it? shrug all I know was he was 15-20mph faster than I was and seemed to be tracking straight)

My 6 has 225/40R18 summer tires and it is better any of my Mustangs in the ice. Regardless of tires. All-season 14" pizza cutters to 225/60R15s to 225/55R16s. My Daytona was roughly the same size and weight as a Fox body Mustang and it was far superior in the ice.

In one ice storm, my boss picked me up in his W126 Mercedes Benz diesel. It handled everything well. I had a Suzuki Swift. I could get moving and I could stop but the car lacked enough mass to get out of the ruts effectively. That was actually beneficial on one steep hill on I-20. It was like being on one of those go-kart tracks at a theme park. I went faster and faster but the car would not leave the lane It was scary but kind of funny.
_________________________
2013 Chevrolet Cruze Eco - dealer Dexos
2014 Chrysler 200S - Whatever the dealer put in it.
1987 Honda CN250 Helix - Penn Platinum Euro5W40

Top
#2304188 - 07/02/11 01:36 PM Re: RWD v. FWD for snow use [Re: RamFan]
dparm Offline


Registered: 04/19/10
Posts: 12612
Loc: Chicago, IL
My S4's quattro has truly sold me on 4WD/AWD in snowy climates. I was able to drive through this without any problems earlier in the year (on 245/40R18 Blizzak LM25-V tires):




Edited by dparm (07/02/11 01:37 PM)
_________________________
2011.5 BMW M3 saloon ZCP
der stärkste buchstabe der welt
Castrol Edge Professional TWS 10w60 + Mahle OX 254D3

Top
#2304190 - 07/02/11 01:39 PM Re: RWD v. FWD for snow use [Re: RamFan]
demarpaint Offline


Registered: 07/03/05
Posts: 23076
Loc: NY
4WD drive rules, LOL.

All kidding aside, given a choice of RWD with a LSD, or FWD I'd take the RWD LSD combo with a stick shift. I've owned both.
_________________________
God Bless Our Troops


Top
#2304200 - 07/02/11 02:06 PM Re: RWD v. FWD for snow use [Re: demarpaint]
fdcg27 Online   content


Registered: 09/25/09
Posts: 10914
Loc: OH
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
4WD drive rules, LOL.

All kidding aside, given a choice of RWD with a LSD, or FWD I'd take the RWD LSD combo with a stick shift. I've owned both.


I find LSD a problem when driving.
I keep picturing myself on a boat on a river, with tangerine trees and marmalade skies.
Sorry, although I agree with your point, I couldn't resist.
_________________________
12 Accord LX 36K PP 0W-20
09 Forester 67K PU 5W-30
02 Accord 144K GOil 5W-30
01 Focus ZX3 101K Meijer Syn 5W-20
95 BMW 318iC 150K Defy 10W-40

Top
#2304250 - 07/02/11 02:58 PM Re: RWD v. FWD for snow use [Re: fdcg27]
demarpaint Offline


Registered: 07/03/05
Posts: 23076
Loc: NY
Originally Posted By: fdcg27
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
4WD drive rules, LOL.

All kidding aside, given a choice of RWD with a LSD, or FWD I'd take the RWD LSD combo with a stick shift. I've owned both.


I find LSD a problem when driving.
I keep picturing myself on a boat on a river, with tangerine trees and marmalade skies.
Sorry, although I agree with your point, I couldn't resist.



Did you go to HS in the 70's? LOL
_________________________
God Bless Our Troops


Top
#2304302 - 07/02/11 04:01 PM Re: RWD v. FWD for snow use [Re: demarpaint]
fdcg27 Online   content


Registered: 09/25/09
Posts: 10914
Loc: OH
Actually, I did.
_________________________
12 Accord LX 36K PP 0W-20
09 Forester 67K PU 5W-30
02 Accord 144K GOil 5W-30
01 Focus ZX3 101K Meijer Syn 5W-20
95 BMW 318iC 150K Defy 10W-40

Top
#2304306 - 07/02/11 04:04 PM Re: RWD v. FWD for snow use [Re: RamFan]
demarpaint Offline


Registered: 07/03/05
Posts: 23076
Loc: NY
I thought so, I did too.
_________________________
God Bless Our Troops


Top
#2304354 - 07/02/11 05:25 PM Re: RWD v. FWD for snow use [Re: RamFan]
subiedriver Offline


Registered: 06/04/10
Posts: 517
Loc: Colorado
I'l take neither, after driving my AWD Subaru over the course of 2 Colorado winter's, you couldn't give me a fwd, certainly not a rwd. My Subie is the shiz-nit in the snow, lol.
_________________________
2004 Subaru Legacy 4 door, 2.5, 140,000 miles
Always Mobil 1, since I bought it at 80,000 miles.
30 mpg

Top
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 >