45901 Members
64 Forums
195310 Topics
3016155 Posts
Max Online: 2449 @ 05/13/13 01:57 PM
|
|
|
#2304130 - 07/02/11 12:11 PM
RWD v. FWD for snow use
|
Registered: 05/09/10
Posts: 1129
Loc: Illinois, U.S.A
|
Not an article, more like a Q&A.
_________________________
07 Charger SXT 3.5l V6 - 61k - T5 10w30 08 Sebring Touring Convertible 2.7l V6 - 30k - Super 5000 5w20 06 Monte Carlo LT 3.9l V6 - 128k - MaxLife 5w30
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2304138 - 07/02/11 12:21 PM
Re: RWD v. FWD for snow use
[Re: RamFan]
|
Registered: 04/19/10
Posts: 7978
Loc: Lombard, IL
|
With today's modern tires (and snow tires), stability control, torque vectoring, etc...I find there's almost no real difference.
_________________________
2011 BMW M3 saloon Castrol Edge 10w60 + Mahle OX 254D3
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2304140 - 07/02/11 12:23 PM
Re: RWD v. FWD for snow use
[Re: dparm]
|
Registered: 12/14/02
Posts: 28334
Loc: New Jersey
|
With today's modern tires (and snow tires), stability control, torque vectoring, etc...I find there's almost no real difference. But the physics of the situation (real ones, not computer actuated stuff) still favors the FWD vehicle, IMO.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2304145 - 07/02/11 12:28 PM
Re: RWD v. FWD for snow use
[Re: JHZR2]
|
Registered: 07/26/04
Posts: 7555
Loc: Middlesex County CT
|
With today's modern tires (and snow tires), stability control, torque vectoring, etc...I find there's almost no real difference. But the physics of the situation (real ones, not computer actuated stuff) still favors the FWD vehicle, IMO. +1 RWD=no control over direction of traction. That is a "big" reality no one can convince me is not important.
_________________________
2003 Echo, >308K, Supergard(sic) 5W-20 and a white can. 2006 B2300, 75K,ALM
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2304152 - 07/02/11 12:34 PM
Re: RWD v. FWD for snow use
[Re: RamFan]
|
Registered: 02/29/08
Posts: 643
Loc: displaced to IL
|
With 4 snow tires (not 2 on the drive wheels!) and some attention to the road I still prefer RWD myself. Learned to drive RWD, first 4 vehicles were RWD, not drive an AWD. Just do not like how a FWD car handles.
_________________________
2003 Subaru Outback 2.5 H4 128k G-Oil 5w30, Purolater classic oil filter Valvoline Maxlife ATF Valvoline Durablend 80w90
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2304165 - 07/02/11 12:52 PM
Re: RWD v. FWD for snow use
[Re: JHZR2]
|
Registered: 04/19/10
Posts: 7978
Loc: Lombard, IL
|
With today's modern tires (and snow tires), stability control, torque vectoring, etc...I find there's almost no real difference. But the physics of the situation (real ones, not computer actuated stuff) still favors the FWD vehicle, IMO. Agreed but I've driven FWD, RWD, and AWD cars in the snow (all 3 with the same motor, actually) and with all of today's advancements it pretty much felt the same. AWD was easier to get moving but in terms of car control...very close.
_________________________
2011 BMW M3 saloon Castrol Edge 10w60 + Mahle OX 254D3
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2304176 - 07/02/11 01:26 PM
Re: RWD v. FWD for snow use
[Re: simple_gifts]
|
Registered: 09/25/09
Posts: 6292
Loc: OH
|
With today's modern tires (and snow tires), stability control, torque vectoring, etc...I find there's almost no real difference. But the physics of the situation (real ones, not computer actuated stuff) still favors the FWD vehicle, IMO. +1 RWD=no control over direction of traction. That is a "big" reality no one can convince me is not important. Actually, RWD offers the option of steering with both the steering wheel and your right foot, while a FWD car will simply plow itself toward the outside of a corner. FWD is probably more idiot-proof, but RWD offers options to anyone who's driven RWD enough to be comfortable with it. Neither is in the same class as AWD, though.
_________________________
12 Accord LX-P 14 mi. FF 09 Forester 51K Synpower 5W30 99 Accord 165K QTP 10W30 96 Impreza AWD 151K Maxlife 10W30 95 BMW 318iC 139K Maxlife 10W40
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2304179 - 07/02/11 01:28 PM
Re: RWD v. FWD for snow use
[Re: RamFan]
|
Registered: 09/06/10
Posts: 4819
Loc: Arlington
|
It seems to me that it is dependant on the car. I got passed by a 5-series in the ice this past winter when I felt like I was at the safest speed my fwd Mazda6 could travel.(the 5-er was backwards against the wall a couple miles down the road but I did not see what made that happen. Driver error? Someone else caused it?  all I know was he was 15-20mph faster than I was and seemed to be tracking straight) My 6 has 225/40R18 summer tires and it is better any of my Mustangs in the ice. Regardless of tires. All-season 14" pizza cutters to 225/60R15s to 225/55R16s. My Daytona was roughly the same size and weight as a Fox body Mustang and it was far superior in the ice. In one ice storm, my boss picked me up in his W126 Mercedes Benz diesel. It handled everything well. I had a Suzuki Swift. I could get moving and I could stop but the car lacked enough mass to get out of the ruts effectively. That was actually beneficial on one steep hill on I-20. It was like being on one of those go-kart tracks at a theme park. I went faster and faster but the car would not leave the lane It was scary but kind of funny.
_________________________
2005 Mazda 6S hatchback - Mobil Super High Mileage 5W20 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser GT - QSUD 5W30
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2304188 - 07/02/11 01:36 PM
Re: RWD v. FWD for snow use
[Re: RamFan]
|
Registered: 04/19/10
Posts: 7978
Loc: Lombard, IL
|
My S4's quattro has truly sold me on 4WD/AWD in snowy climates. I was able to drive through this without any problems earlier in the year (on 245/40R18 Blizzak LM25-V tires): 
Edited by dparm (07/02/11 01:37 PM)
_________________________
2011 BMW M3 saloon Castrol Edge 10w60 + Mahle OX 254D3
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2304190 - 07/02/11 01:39 PM
Re: RWD v. FWD for snow use
[Re: RamFan]
|
Registered: 07/03/05
Posts: 17542
Loc: NY
|
4WD drive rules, LOL.
All kidding aside, given a choice of RWD with a LSD, or FWD I'd take the RWD LSD combo with a stick shift. I've owned both.
_________________________
GOD Bless our Troops!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2304200 - 07/02/11 02:06 PM
Re: RWD v. FWD for snow use
[Re: demarpaint]
|
Registered: 09/25/09
Posts: 6292
Loc: OH
|
4WD drive rules, LOL.
All kidding aside, given a choice of RWD with a LSD, or FWD I'd take the RWD LSD combo with a stick shift. I've owned both. I find LSD a problem when driving. I keep picturing myself on a boat on a river, with tangerine trees and marmalade skies. Sorry, although I agree with your point, I couldn't resist.
_________________________
12 Accord LX-P 14 mi. FF 09 Forester 51K Synpower 5W30 99 Accord 165K QTP 10W30 96 Impreza AWD 151K Maxlife 10W30 95 BMW 318iC 139K Maxlife 10W40
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2304250 - 07/02/11 02:58 PM
Re: RWD v. FWD for snow use
[Re: fdcg27]
|
Registered: 07/03/05
Posts: 17542
Loc: NY
|
4WD drive rules, LOL.
All kidding aside, given a choice of RWD with a LSD, or FWD I'd take the RWD LSD combo with a stick shift. I've owned both. I find LSD a problem when driving. I keep picturing myself on a boat on a river, with tangerine trees and marmalade skies. Sorry, although I agree with your point, I couldn't resist. Did you go to HS in the 70's? LOL
_________________________
GOD Bless our Troops!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2304302 - 07/02/11 04:01 PM
Re: RWD v. FWD for snow use
[Re: demarpaint]
|
Registered: 09/25/09
Posts: 6292
Loc: OH
|
Actually, I did.
_________________________
12 Accord LX-P 14 mi. FF 09 Forester 51K Synpower 5W30 99 Accord 165K QTP 10W30 96 Impreza AWD 151K Maxlife 10W30 95 BMW 318iC 139K Maxlife 10W40
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2304306 - 07/02/11 04:04 PM
Re: RWD v. FWD for snow use
[Re: RamFan]
|
Registered: 07/03/05
Posts: 17542
Loc: NY
|
I thought so, I did too.
_________________________
GOD Bless our Troops!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2304354 - 07/02/11 05:25 PM
Re: RWD v. FWD for snow use
[Re: RamFan]
|
Registered: 06/04/10
Posts: 517
Loc: Colorado
|
I'l take neither, after driving my AWD Subaru over the course of 2 Colorado winter's, you couldn't give me a fwd, certainly not a rwd. My Subie is the shiz-nit in the snow, lol.
_________________________
2004 Subaru Legacy 4 door, 2.5, 140,000 miles Always Mobil 1, since I bought it at 80,000 miles. 30 mpg
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|