There are really 3 discussions here:
1. weight distribution (physics)
2. snow tires
3. skill
While any one factor can make up for a lack of the other 2, for point 1: the best weight distribution is often (not always) in a FWD. In fact, the real concern is percentage of weight over the driven wheels (AWD = 100%, FWD is usually 60-55% RWD is usually 35-40%)
The old VWs were unstoppable in snow - weight distribution was very favorable.
On point 2: there is no comparison between snow tires and all seasons. I would take my old RWD Volvo wagon (close to 50%) with 4 Hakkapeliitta snow tires on it over an AWD any day...and during some Vermont Blizzards, I watched the flatlanders in AWD Subarus wipe out in front of me. The weight distribution advantage of AWD is only on acceleration or climbing hills - all cars use all wheels to brake and to turn...
And point 3? well...what can I say, there are morons and inexperienced drivers everywhere...the low-traction world of winter driving just highlights their shortcomings...
1. weight distribution (physics)
2. snow tires
3. skill
While any one factor can make up for a lack of the other 2, for point 1: the best weight distribution is often (not always) in a FWD. In fact, the real concern is percentage of weight over the driven wheels (AWD = 100%, FWD is usually 60-55% RWD is usually 35-40%)
The old VWs were unstoppable in snow - weight distribution was very favorable.
On point 2: there is no comparison between snow tires and all seasons. I would take my old RWD Volvo wagon (close to 50%) with 4 Hakkapeliitta snow tires on it over an AWD any day...and during some Vermont Blizzards, I watched the flatlanders in AWD Subarus wipe out in front of me. The weight distribution advantage of AWD is only on acceleration or climbing hills - all cars use all wheels to brake and to turn...
And point 3? well...what can I say, there are morons and inexperienced drivers everywhere...the low-traction world of winter driving just highlights their shortcomings...