- Joined
- Sep 26, 2010
- Messages
- 9,807
Gang,
I need some objective opinions from those that have experience with both of these laboratories. I have been using Blackstone for my UOAs and although I am not dissatisfied with them, when I compare the value of the UOAs provided by WearCheck, on the surface it seems obvious that WearCheck is the better deal. Blackstone = $34.00 for UOA + TBN versus WearCheck = $24.00 for UOA + TAN. WearCheck states that a TAN is more appropriate for a gasoline engine and TBN is better for diesel. I do not have enough knowledge about TAN versus TBN to have an opinion.
Additionally, as amusing as Blackstone's rhetoric can be (at least on some that I have read here), it certainly seems that WearCheck is more "scientific" and has better documented processes quoting several ASTM standards.
So, finally, the questions:
--Which is the better value?
--Which do you trust more?
--Why?
Thanks in advance for any thoughts...
I need some objective opinions from those that have experience with both of these laboratories. I have been using Blackstone for my UOAs and although I am not dissatisfied with them, when I compare the value of the UOAs provided by WearCheck, on the surface it seems obvious that WearCheck is the better deal. Blackstone = $34.00 for UOA + TBN versus WearCheck = $24.00 for UOA + TAN. WearCheck states that a TAN is more appropriate for a gasoline engine and TBN is better for diesel. I do not have enough knowledge about TAN versus TBN to have an opinion.
Additionally, as amusing as Blackstone's rhetoric can be (at least on some that I have read here), it certainly seems that WearCheck is more "scientific" and has better documented processes quoting several ASTM standards.
So, finally, the questions:
--Which is the better value?
--Which do you trust more?
--Why?
Thanks in advance for any thoughts...