Recent Topics
Completing your 80% lower with a CNC Machine
by Merkava_4
05/25/16 07:33 PM
Motor oil Sale
by GuinnessGuy
05/25/16 07:26 PM
If Homer Simpson had a Soldering Station...
by Merkava_4
05/25/16 07:17 PM
Peerless/Tecumseh 205-024c
by ford46guy
05/25/16 07:02 PM
Clever Tire Mounting Machine from Corghi
by SubLGT
05/25/16 06:15 PM
Help - transmission filter does not fit the slot!
by 69GTX
05/25/16 06:06 PM
New Browning Buckmark
by billt460
05/25/16 05:54 PM
Signature Limits?
by 2015_PSD
05/25/16 04:48 PM
pistol grip shotgun wanted
by FirstNissan
05/25/16 04:14 PM
microGreen Memorial Day Sale
by DBMaster
05/25/16 03:18 PM
Biomed Tech internship - Osceola, FL
by Mr Nice
05/25/16 03:06 PM
New Car - First OCI Subaru Outback
by Oldswagon
05/25/16 02:43 PM
Newest Members
Hokie_Dave, ant3a, afterburnerbg, SupraSaiyan, Bighorn2500
57973 Registered Users
Who's Online
109 registered (4WD, 2KBMW, 901Memphis, 04SE, 69GTX, 97prizm, 13 invisible), 1735 Guests and 326 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
57973 Members
66 Forums
249402 Topics
4082389 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Topic Options
#1849141 - 04/08/10 07:39 AM ? on Honda Accord 4cyl timing chain yrs
Gator Offline


Registered: 11/26/09
Posts: 304
Loc: Alabama
Do any of you guys no which years did Honda Accord 4cyl engines come with the timing chain rather than the belt. I no some had a chain in 2003 not sure if they all did or if it was just some. Also what is your opinion on this car with the chain vs the belt, as far as longevity and cost is concerned, a touch of extra noise is no problem.

Top
#1849145 - 04/08/10 07:44 AM Re: ? on Honda Accord 4cyl timing chain yrs [Re: Gator]
bepperb Offline


Registered: 01/10/08
Posts: 4946
Loc: Milwaukee, WI
The F22 and F23 (2.3 liters) ran from the early 90's until the 2002 year and had a belt. The K24 (2.4 liters) is from 2003 on and had a chain.

I've had both, I really like the K24 and would recommend spending a few thousand more for a 03+. The F23 was fun but the K24 has a lot more power between 2-4000 rpm, gets better mileage, you save a few hundred on the belt... etc.

Both engines are very durable, and sold in large numbers. You do hear the chain whine.
_________________________
2004 Highlander 2.4
2011 Toyota Sienna 3.5
Recently Gone:
2006 Accord 2.4l K24A8
1993 Kawi EX 500

Top
#1849147 - 04/08/10 07:47 AM Re: ? on Honda Accord 4cyl timing chain yrs [Re: Gator]
ARCOgraphite Offline


Registered: 05/17/09
Posts: 9867
Loc: N.H, U.S.A.
Engines are easier on the oil with a belt. Belt can cause oil foaming and tensioner stiocking and guide wear common. Chains on Asain cars have a lot of problems. The ford V8 has been pretty good. BMW 3.2 BAD, Mazda V6 BAD, Suzuki 4 and V6 BAD, Toyota OK. Honda ??.
_________________________
2014 Nissan Rogue S CVT, OC#4 13740mi-Castrol Magnetec 5W30+Nissan 15208-9E01A Filter
2015 Forester 6MT 5Door, OC#6 41243mi-M1EP 0W20+Subaru Filter

Top
#1849154 - 04/08/10 07:51 AM Re: ? on Honda Accord 4cyl timing chain yrs [Re: ARCOgraphite]
JHZR2 Offline



Registered: 12/14/02
Posts: 37985
Loc: New Jersey
considering that anything from the 90's through today have roughly the same $$$ emissions components, IMO youre not getting out of anything by running back to an older car, unless the style/design meets your likes better.

IMO youre better of with the latest technology and newer rubber parts given the costs to replace most things are roughly the same.

So Id go for newer. I'd be looking for the last year before they changed to this current body style, and for one with an MT.

Top
#1849174 - 04/08/10 08:14 AM Re: ? on Honda Accord 4cyl timing chain yrs [Re: ARCOgraphite]
ARCOgraphite Offline


Registered: 05/17/09
Posts: 9867
Loc: N.H, U.S.A.
Originally Posted By: ARCOgraphite
... Belt can cause oil foaming and tensioner stiocking and guide wear common.
I meant CHAIN. Not enough ASSAM Tea consumed yet wink
_________________________
2014 Nissan Rogue S CVT, OC#4 13740mi-Castrol Magnetec 5W30+Nissan 15208-9E01A Filter
2015 Forester 6MT 5Door, OC#6 41243mi-M1EP 0W20+Subaru Filter

Top
#1849313 - 04/08/10 10:28 AM Re: ? on Honda Accord 4cyl timing chain yrs [Re: ARCOgraphite]
bepperb Offline


Registered: 01/10/08
Posts: 4946
Loc: Milwaukee, WI
"Engines are easier on the oil with a belt. "

Well, that's a good theory, but in a comparison of these two engines specifically, the chained one has a longer OCI better UOA's on this website. Probably has more to do with the F series being 20+ years old, the K series was new in 01 on the CRV.

Personally, I'd rather change the oil more often than do the belt. On these it's a pain as an engine mount runs right through the loop of the belt, plus two balance shafts and a water pump. No thanks. But really, 7500 was a reasonable OCI on the old engine, the new 10,000 miles is doable.


Edited by bepperb (04/08/10 10:29 AM)
_________________________
2004 Highlander 2.4
2011 Toyota Sienna 3.5
Recently Gone:
2006 Accord 2.4l K24A8
1993 Kawi EX 500

Top
#1849518 - 04/08/10 01:35 PM Re: ? on Honda Accord 4cyl timing chain yrs [Re: bepperb]
mechtech2 Offline


Registered: 09/05/06
Posts: 19479
Loc: Chicago Area
Chains and their gear teeth mates chew up oil.
If they are not there, much less chewing is taking place.

Top
#1849563 - 04/08/10 02:07 PM Re: ? on Honda Accord 4cyl timing chain yrs [Re: mechtech2]
bepperb Offline


Registered: 01/10/08
Posts: 4946
Loc: Milwaukee, WI
You'd sure be right if that was the only difference between the two engines.....


Edited by bepperb (04/08/10 02:08 PM)
_________________________
2004 Highlander 2.4
2011 Toyota Sienna 3.5
Recently Gone:
2006 Accord 2.4l K24A8
1993 Kawi EX 500

Top
#1851146 - 04/09/10 04:05 PM Re: ? on Honda Accord 4cyl timing chain yrs [Re: bepperb]
mechtech2 Offline


Registered: 09/05/06
Posts: 19479
Loc: Chicago Area
?

Top