Three observations from the link provided below -
1.) I was of the (mis-) understanding that PAOs were near the performance limits and wouldn't be improved on significantly.
2.) I was of the (mis-) understanding that Grp IIIs were near or passing PAOs in multiple metrics.
(Qoute from link below - "Since PAO-based products significantly outperform mineral oil and enhanced mineral oil (Group III) based products, we can provide you with a superior PAO that will solve your specific lubricant needs."
3.) It would appear that ExxonMobil has another category of Synthetics (SpecraSyn) that is categorically better than SuperSyn - and it's not being used in their automobile oils - telling me we auto users are related to second tier. They have developed SpectraSyn, SpectrSyn Plus, and SpectraSyn Ultra. Meanwhile our one option - SuperSyn.
(I was aware of SpectraSyn, and some of the above issues, but had thought about it and forgot about it.)
http://www.exxonmobilchemical.com/Public...adeOverview.asp
1.) I was of the (mis-) understanding that PAOs were near the performance limits and wouldn't be improved on significantly.
2.) I was of the (mis-) understanding that Grp IIIs were near or passing PAOs in multiple metrics.
(Qoute from link below - "Since PAO-based products significantly outperform mineral oil and enhanced mineral oil (Group III) based products, we can provide you with a superior PAO that will solve your specific lubricant needs."
3.) It would appear that ExxonMobil has another category of Synthetics (SpecraSyn) that is categorically better than SuperSyn - and it's not being used in their automobile oils - telling me we auto users are related to second tier. They have developed SpectraSyn, SpectrSyn Plus, and SpectraSyn Ultra. Meanwhile our one option - SuperSyn.
(I was aware of SpectraSyn, and some of the above issues, but had thought about it and forgot about it.)
http://www.exxonmobilchemical.com/Public...adeOverview.asp