Originally Posted By: ZeeOSix
I'm wondering if Purolator is trying to save costs by reducing the number of pleats in some of their filters. Going from 51 to 46 pleats is a pretty significant difference, and highly doubt it was accidental.
Ding-ding-ding!
I'm wondering if Purolator is trying to save costs by reducing the number of pleats in some of their filters. Going from 51 to 46 pleats is a pretty significant difference, and highly doubt it was accidental.
Ding-ding-ding!