Recent Topics
killing weeds without poisoning well
by oilboy123
07/24/16 01:27 AM
1999 ford expedition factory mercon v synthetic??
by merconvvv
07/23/16 11:40 PM
Buick 3800 - "Von Voyage" oil change?
by Alex_V
07/23/16 10:41 PM
Low oil level light on, but level not THAT low....
by gregk24
07/23/16 10:26 PM
Is SuperLube syn multi grease universal
by NattyBoh
07/23/16 10:05 PM
How come discount tire doesn't use jack stands?
by motor_oil_madman
07/23/16 09:41 PM
SAFETY ?: ramps in rear and jack stands in front
by SavagePatch
07/23/16 09:03 PM
Pennzoil ultra 5w30 back in stock at Walmart.com
by kohnen
07/23/16 08:37 PM
Homelite weedeater not getting fuel
by Drew99GT
07/23/16 08:26 PM
Stability issue on 2015 F250
by Donald
07/23/16 07:25 PM
2016 Tacoma 3.5L V6 4x4
by NavyVet88
07/23/16 07:10 PM
Question on 05 Nissan tranny w/120k
by NattyBoh
07/23/16 06:58 PM
Newest Members
Matt_P, tpragski, 182RG, BillHuang, jwilliamson185
58578 Registered Users
Who's Online
36 registered (Chewie, austinlunsford, c502cid, bamorris2, aquariuscsm, 4 invisible), 741 Guests and 16 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
58578 Members
66 Forums
252174 Topics
4135116 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Topic Options
#3396636 - 06/13/14 02:10 PM basic home test of Star Tron....
badtlc Offline


Registered: 06/08/06
Posts: 4979
Loc: KC
http://www.thehulltruth.com/boating-forum/430716-ethanol-sludge-unscientific-startron-test.html

Since people seem to be into testing from users lately, maybe some would be interested in this one.
_________________________
2007 Ford Escape XLS 2.3L ATX, Trop Artic 5W30, Fram OCOD, 140k+
2015 Chrysler T&C, 45k+

Top
#3396650 - 06/13/14 02:25 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
NHGUY Offline


Registered: 10/09/11
Posts: 4655
Loc: USA
Something is wrong,cant get into that page.Must be sludged up...

Top
#3396673 - 06/13/14 02:45 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
Donald Offline


Registered: 03/21/04
Posts: 17037
Loc: Upstate NY
The test was trying to dissolve formed varnish particles. Most people are looking to prevent fuel and ethanol problems not dissolving particles of varnish. So I am not sure how valid a test it was.
_________________________
2015 Subaru Forester 2.5 engine/CVT
2015 Ford F250 w/Powerstroke
2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo 4.0- sold
1999 Dodge Ram 2500 w/Cummins- 4-sale


Top
#3396675 - 06/13/14 02:47 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: Donald]
badtlc Offline


Registered: 06/08/06
Posts: 4979
Loc: KC
Originally Posted By: Donald
The test was trying to dissolve formed varnish particles. Most people are looking to prevent fuel and ethanol problems not dissolving particles of varnish. So I am not sure how valid a test it was.


It isn't valid at all. Home testing can rarely be done in a "valid" manner.
_________________________
2007 Ford Escape XLS 2.3L ATX, Trop Artic 5W30, Fram OCOD, 140k+
2015 Chrysler T&C, 45k+

Top
#3396785 - 06/13/14 04:38 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
dave5358 Offline


Registered: 04/25/13
Posts: 669
Loc: North Bend
Originally Posted By: badtlc
Originally Posted By: Donald
The test was trying to dissolve formed varnish particles. Most people are looking to prevent fuel and ethanol problems not dissolving particles of varnish. So I am not sure how valid a test it was.

It isn't valid at all. Home testing can rarely be done in a "valid" manner.

I hope you're being sarcastic.
_________________________
2006 Forester XT
2008 Corolla LE

Top
#3396891 - 06/13/14 07:06 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: dave5358]
GatorJ Offline


Registered: 07/24/03
Posts: 180
Loc: Tampa
Originally Posted By: dave5358
Originally Posted By: badtlc
Originally Posted By: Donald
The test was trying to dissolve formed varnish particles. Most people are looking to prevent fuel and ethanol problems not dissolving particles of varnish. So I am not sure how valid a test it was.

It isn't valid at all. Home testing can rarely be done in a "valid" manner.

I hope you're being sarcastic.


Or obtuse.

Top
#3397262 - 06/14/14 08:38 AM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
05LGTLtd Offline


Registered: 03/04/13
Posts: 947
Loc: Va
The first thing I would question is why would you test an additive at full strength, especially on that claims to be an 'enzyme' additive. It's designed to work diluted with gasoline, why not do the bench test with a mix?

I use StarTron in an older vehicle and my OPE regularly. I don't expect miracles, but so far no problems with it for me. I started a thread a while back asking if any of the chemists here on the board could give some insight on the enzyme additive and never heard much...
_________________________
2005 Legacy GT, Synpower 5w-40
2010 Forester SOHC, Edge 0w-30

Top
#3397267 - 06/14/14 08:48 AM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
Trav Offline


Registered: 11/20/06
Posts: 14036
Loc: MA, Mittelfranken.de
The marinas i do work for claim it hasn't helped with their ethanol issues.
_________________________
ASE L1, Master. Deutsch Meisterbrief.

Top
#3398410 - 06/15/14 07:38 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
morris Offline


Registered: 08/24/08
Posts: 3681
Loc: ks, wichita
a real test has to be a "double blind" test. i think what that means is ALL the people doing the test dont know what if they are using oil "A" or "B". could i be right?

Top
#3398440 - 06/15/14 08:04 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: morris]
dave5358 Offline


Registered: 04/25/13
Posts: 669
Loc: North Bend
Originally Posted By: morris
a real test has to be a "double blind" test. i think what that means is ALL the people doing the test dont know what if they are using oil "A" or "B". could i be right?

As opposed to an unreal test? Double blind testing is frequently done with test medications: both the patient and the person administering the drug don't know if the pill is the real drug or a placebo. Hence, 'double blind'.

If you were testing an engine or an additive or some mechanical device, you might be better off keeping both eyes open. The only possible need for a double blind test would be a situation in which the test operator could materially influence the results, or if you planned to simply asked the operator for his opinion ("yeah, it ran great!"). If you can measure the results more objectively (more mpg per the ECU, greater cylinder pressure per the pressure gauge, less fuel used based on pump records) there is little need for a double blind test.
_________________________
2006 Forester XT
2008 Corolla LE

Top