Originally Posted By: dparm
Originally Posted By: edhackett
A $23 movement in a $200 watch is pretty high end.
There are $2000 watches out there with $16 movements, (cough) Tag (cough).
I've developed a healthy respect for ETA movements. I wore a Wenger Swiss Army that kept near perfect time for over 15 years that had a bottom end(~$10) all plastic ETA movement.
Ed
I too like ETA movements, but you need to be careful on which one you have. The 2824 is the lowest I would really go, with the 2892 being preferable to that.
And yes, many companies like Breitling, Omega, Rolex, Panerai, etc use ETAs as the basis for their movements and add embellishments. If you can find a watch with a Valjoux 7750, you're basically going to find a COSC-certified chronometre for 1/4 the price of a Rolex.
Does it really matter if it's quartz? Supposedly the finishing for the mechanicals is supposed to improve accuracy, but a quartz is electronically regulated.
I mean - I've got one of the ETA Auto-Quartz movements in a Tissot. It's got a display back with the Tissot name on the rotor. I understand it's the identical movement as in an Omega-Matic Seamaster. Quartz is not something where a lot of money buys better performance. $15 movements go into $200 value watches and $2000 fancy cases. You're not really paying for timekeeping performance but for the case and dial.
The other thing is that even if a movement in a fancy watch just got ruined by a leaking battery (Renata is notorious) it's only a cheap movement that can be repaired easily. A watchmaker dropping in a new movement is cheaper than overhauling an automatic.