Originally Posted By: jorton
Even though the wife drives only 10k per year, two oc is not excessive.
Agreed; however, a UOA could show that, while not excessive, it may be unecessary to change out so frequently. Oil is cheap and, with out UOA, why risk it, right? I for sure don't look down on any one who changes a little TOO frequently. In all honesty, I'd still prefer a used car (not backed up by UOA) whose owner ran 5k OCI to another with 10k OCI, but that's more of a trust thing than anything else. I don't trust some one to have checked the oil every so often over a longer interval.
For some, I think, a UOA may only be a tool to determine how their engine is "wearing". This may may simply be a result of poor understanding of exactly how data in a UOA is to be interpreted, and provides the user with another $22.50 worth of peace of mind, if nothing practical.
For me, it's taking every bit of will power to stop myself from changing out the Shell T6 in my turbo Subie before the 7k Dyson-recommended OCI. It's tough to break away from old, outdated tribal knowledge and marketing, but it's even harder to argue with data and the analysis of some one like Terry Dyson. I for darned sure didn't pay $99 just to have a cool matrix with all sorts of data I didn't intend to utilize.