I owned Ford stock back sometime in the early 2010's. It was $10-$12 bucks then. I sold it because it traded sideways. I looked recently and it is still ~$12 more than 10 years later. As a share owner I would be hot with this sort of situation. Glad I dumped it for other investments.
Yep. The devil is in the details, both good and otherwise.
They are weird indeed. Seen multiple around here already in the wild. I see one regularly at daycare where I drop off my son. It is 50/50 love or hate and it is just different. I would not say I like it much, neither I dislike it. But shelling out about $120k (thise first edition are most expensive) for one— I don’t get it. Same for Rivian R1S suv model, my friend’s husband in Cali got one, waited about 2 years for it, shelled out about 90k. He sounded disappointed when I asked him about it, soon after it arrived. “Not worth the price tag. You would expect much more quality and luxury at that price”.
Does it at least pay good dividend?
I think the birth rate collapse all over the world (starting in Japan then to SK and now China) and work from home is going to fix that soon.yes, so many "what if's".
If that's how we decided what to prioritize and how to structure our lives, there would be no point in getting out of bed every morning.
My point is there's far too many items we depend on daily that depend on crude oil.
Even the almighty EV isn't immune to crude oil as many of it's plastics/resins/fluids used in manufacturing and maintenance depends on it.
As a result, we need not worry about it because there's little anyone in this thread can do to change things.
Have any documents or proof? You don't miss water until your well runs dry. It's a non renewable energy resource with a finite supply. Makes more sense to me than we have to reduce our carbon footprint for the climate LOL! Better put carbon limits on all plant life emitting it.
I’m a geologist in the energy industry and the peak oil term is really not a good one. While oil is a finite resource the notion that we’ll run out of it is also misunderstood.
Rivian loses $1.45 billion as cost-cutting measures continue | TechCrunch
Rivian lost $1.45 billion in Q1, showing its recent company-wide cost-cutting measures have a ways to go before it can approach profitability.techcrunch.com
The Mach-E is a bit bland. I think the F150 Lightning was a valiant effort cut short by not going far enough to maximize range.
It's pretty easy to look it up but I'll do the work for you.
www.discovermagazine.com
www.investors.com
I mean, technically it renews, just at a scale that can't support the rate of extraction, if we consider how it got there in the first place. Nothing is "renewable" if you push the timeline out far enough, as eventually the sun will no longer support life on this planet.
Plants don’t emit carbon (unless they’re burned), they sequester it. Also, the more CO2 that is present, the faster and more robustly the plants grow. And, if CO2 is too low in the atmosphere, the plants starve to death.
1.5C global average is much different than the maxima during summertime in the poles, which are a bigger piece of what matter.
I would like to see a peer-reviewed source for this. I think the planet Venus might disagree.
Water vapor cycles through the atmosphere at such a fast rate that its level is more or less constant over time, on average. It factors out if the equation. Without its effect earth would basically not be habitable at all.
There is plenty of hijacking of the science for political, corporate, and other gains. It’s unfortunate.
Oil was predicted to run out in 1899 about 10 years after it was first drilled ,and about every decade since.
